Re: ODF Toolkit may need help

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling. > > This podling has been incubating for over 4 years now. Last month they > filed a report without mentor sign off, without any feedback on the mailing > list. They have

Re: Shepherd notes for ODF Toolkit

On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > I'm adding some shepherd notes for ODF Toolkit. I think my main concern is > lack of mentor participation on the project. Rob Weir (I swear every time > I type his name I type the d) has taken a mentor role

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

> > Please vote > +1 for accepting corinthia into incubator > 0 for dont care > -1 for not accepting corinthia into incubator (please add a reason). > +1 (binding) . . . > == Initial Goals == > > The initial and most important goal is to enlarge the community consisting > of developers, testers,

Re: Wiki Access

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Svante Schubert wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a developer and an incubator PMC member and desire access to the > incubator Wiki. > > Can somebody please give me (user svanteschubert) access to the Wiki (in > particular the incubator report [1]) so I am able to fill in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Justin Mclean wrote: >> >> This VOTE has now been going on for more than a month. Anyone able to help >> out here? > > > I thought the vote had passed? > Yes. The [VOTE][RESULT] post is here: http://markmail.org/message/

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator exit criteria

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Christian Grobmeier >> > wrote: >> >> I think its not enough to just look at release /

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> No other votes were received so the release is approved. > > Congratulations, and many thanks to the Apache ODF Toolkit podling for > sticking it out throug

[VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

Including the earlier PPMC phase of the vote (noted in the release manifest [1]) we have a total of 4 binding votes: +1 PPMC Oliver Rau (olira) +1 IPMC/PPMC Rob Weir (robweir) +1 PPMC Svante Schubert (svanteschubert) +1 IPMC Justin Mclean (jmclean) No other votes were received so the release is

[VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

RC4 for the ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~robweir/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.6.1-incubating/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/odftoolkit-0.6.1-incubating-RC4/ We'r

[Proposal] Add me as Mentor for ODF Toolkit Podling

I looked around and did not see a process defined for adding a Mentor to a podling. I see how they are added at podling initiation, but not after. So apologies if I'm missing something. It appears that we have at present zero active Mentors, so even with the experimental release process we're un

[VOTE][RESULTS] Pre-clear ODF Toolkit Podling to use Alternate Release Voting Process

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > The process is described here: > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases > > Please vote: > > [ ] +1 Yes, to pre-clear the ODF Toolkit Polding to use the Alternate > Release Voting Proce

[VOTE] Pre-clear ODF Toolkit Podling to use Alternate Release Voting Process

The process is described here: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Please vote: [ ] +1 Yes, to pre-clear the ODF Toolkit Polding to use the Alternate Release Voting Process [ ] -1 No, do not pre-clear the ODF Toolkit Polding to use the Alternate Release Voting

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache ODF Release situation

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> I'll upgrade my vote to +1 (binding) >> >> That gives us two +1's from the IPMC. Need one more to release. >> >> I realize many are bus

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > We'r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

ders. > > Nothing to block this release. > > +1 (binding IPMC) > Great, thanks! -Rob > Regards, > Dave > > > On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Henry Saputra >> wrote: >>> Hi Rob, the result

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

f anyone is interested, pleased let us know at odf-...@incubator.apache.org Regards, -Rob > Thx, > > - Henry > > [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > On

[VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E We're now looking for review and approval by the IPMC. Regards, -Rob --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6-incubating(RC5)

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Florian Hopf wrote: > Hi Joe, > > thanks for your feedback. This is my first release and only the second > release of the Odftoolkit so I am glad to get some guidance on things we > missed so far. > > > On 18.05.2013 20:41, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6-incubating(RC4)

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:41 AM, sebb wrote: > On 2 May 2013 07:04, Florian Hopf wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The ODF Toolkit 0.6 is ready for release. >> >> We had a successful vote in the PPMC. The PPMC vote result is here: >> http://markmail.org/message/**fqikz72pys4qr7pa

Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 25/01/2013 Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >>> >>> What about Apache OpenOffice? >> >> I asked this question about Open Office, and I got, more or less, what >> I typed in above. I

Re: Preparing for the October reports

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on t

Re: Preparing for the October reports

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports. > > As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will > hopefully complete that transition shortly. > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Be

Re: [VOTE] [PMC] Starting Membership for Apache OpenOffice PMC

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> FYI - This is being done in public! >> > > Who or what is an RGB.ES? Don't PMC members have to disclose an identity? > All committers must disclosure their identity, in their iCLA [1].

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Re adding ooo-dev@ since this is STILL an AOO issue. > > On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Aug 27, 2012 6:15 AM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm jumping in late to this discussion after returning from vacation. >> To summarize my understanding: >> >> * As Joe says, there's no problem with current OpenOffice releases. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:56 AM, wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote on 08/27/2012 08:43:35 AM: > >> From: Jim Jagielski >> To: general@incubator.apache.org, Joe Schaefer >> , Rob Weir , >> Cc: "ooo-...@incubator.apache.org" >> Date: 08/27/2012 08:

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56 AM, donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote: >> >> Yes, that's what end users care about. But it's not sufficient for AOO >> since we are seeking alternative distribution channels. > > What does that mean? Can I grok "alte

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >> AOO doesn't need to change anything to their current release processes >> other than to stop pointing source downloads at svn (which is the sole >> reason I won't vote for AOO candidates).

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 26.08.2012 13:15, Tim Williams wrote: >> Marvin gave the link earlier in this thread. 4th para is the relevant bit. >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what > > The relevant part is in the last paragraph. However, that says > "conv

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> I can give the IPMC a hand here, if my point is too obscure. A policy >> might look like this: >> >> Resolved: An Apache project's release consists o

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> Or if someone who cared sufficiently about this policy area took >> ownership and proposed a wording of the policy, either as a Board >> resolution, or on legal-

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Aug 24, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> Returning to this topic after an intermission... >> >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >>> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> Returning to this topic after an intermission... >> >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> wrote: >>> On Tue, A

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Returning to this topic after an intermission... > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >> wrote: >>> ...As one of the active developers I would have a serio

[VOTE][RESULTS] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

The community vote has passed. Vote reference: http://s.apache.org/5GA +1 RGB-ES Rory O'Farrell Carl Marcum Reizinger Zoltan Keith N. McKenna Kay Schenk Roberto Galoppini Imacat Andrea Pescetti Regina Henschel Graham Lauder Jürgen Lange T.J. Frazier Rob Weir Dave Fisher Peter Junge Chri

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > >> It is fair to require changes for the next release. It's not fair to use >> different criteria for two successive, essentially identical releases. > > When the option to be "fair"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: >>> On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote: >>>> On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote: >>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: > On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote: >>> I think the NOTICE problems are serious enough to warrant a respin. >> >> This is an unreasonable request. The IPMC voted on the 3.4.0 release. >> The notice file ha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 8/21/12 8:14 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> In my mind as an IPMC member and Apache Member, this is a source release >>> VOTE with convenience binary artifacts. >> >> Thank you, D

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Officially, no Apache project has ever, ever, released a binary. > > Apache projects have published convenience binaries to accompany their > releases, which have been, by definition, source. > Maybe you can help clarify this for me then

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Prescott Nasser > wrote: >> I'm sorry, I'm playing catch-up and I'm a bit unclear on the argument - >> Marvin said: "If the podling believes that ASF-endorsed binaries are a hard >> requirement, >> then it

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >>>... >>> > I wou

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >>... >> > I would also state that continuing to argue is symptomatic of a >> > failure

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:59 PM, drew wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 17:01 -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew wrote: >> > Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having >> > official binary releases - in such a circumstance I would str

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

additional interest in the source drives more investment into the ecosyste, Regards, -Rob Regards, -Rob > Cheers, > -g > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Hu

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew wrote: >> Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having >> official binary releases - in such a circumstance I would strongly >> prefer no binary release at all. > > I wonder

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> Per the IPMC's "Guide to Successful Graduation" [1] this is the >>> optional, but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > -1 > > I object to the cla

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> Per the IPMC's "Guide to Successful Graduation" [1] this is the >> optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our >> willingness/rea

Fwd: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

-- Forwarded message -- From: Rob Weir Date: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:52 AM Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote To: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org Per the IPMC's "Guide to Successful Graduation" [1] this is the optional, but recommended, com

Re: References to "Apache OpenOffice"

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:55 PM, drew wrote: > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 15:42 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew wrote: >> > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: >> >> On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote: >

Re: References to "Apache OpenOffice"

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew wrote: > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: >> On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote: >> >> > Nor what appears on planet.apache.org, featuring the article that first >> > struck me >> > as using the name in a way I wouldn't expect when I re

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 3.4 Released

The Apache OpenOffice Podling Project Management Committee is pleased to announce the release of Apache OpenOffice 3.4, available on Windows, MacOS and Linux. Downloads are available at: http://download.openoffice.org The full release announcement can be read here: http://www.openoffice.org/news/

Re: Legal question about (re)licensing

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > PS: the specific svn revisions here are not the central point, the > point is the lack of any discussion/scrutiny on any of these followed > by the self-fulfilling prophecy: "To be released the code must be > clean. Releasing imply a de

Re: Extraordinary OpenOffice security patch (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2012" by robweir)

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Apr 12, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> Yes, this was already raised on the PPMC (on March 22) as you know.  It >> seems to me that the PPMC is not concerned. >> >> It is interesting that it is thought, here, that the rem

Re: Extraordinary OpenOffice security patch (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2012" by robweir)

ught it important to address these issues in the month since the patch has been public, then I do not think that the same PPMC members would have addressed these concerns if the security team gave them a heads up a day or two earlier. Or a week earlier. Evidently even a month is not even enough.

Re: Extraordinary OpenOffice security patch (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2012" by robweir)

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I don't think the problem is with the size of the ooo-security list > membership.  I think it is in the assumption that the [P]PMC has somehow > delegated the ability to make a release of any kind to the ooo-security team. >  I don't

Re: Extraordinary OpenOffice security patch (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2012" by robweir)

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. > wrote: >> Short of people.a.o/~luser/my-patch.tgz, I'm fairly certain that >> can't happen with an incubating podling.  Everything under the space >> /dist/ must exist under a PM

Re: Is there an ASF license for Apple's "Apple Developer Program" ?

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 3/31/2012 8:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ross Gardler >> wrote: >> >>> There isn't (to my knowledge), I can imagine an increasing number of >>> projects wanti

Re: Is there an ASF license for Apple's "Apple Developer Program" ?

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > There isn't (to my knowledge), I can imagine an increasing number of > projects wanting such a thing though. Unless someone tells me I'm > wrong and we already have one would you be interested in seeing if > Apple are open to such an arrangeme

Re: Multi-licensed dependencies

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:08 PM, sebb wrote: > On 30 March 2012 17:38, Leo Simons wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >>> On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Personally, I agree with Roy. Perhaps

Re: Binary dependencies in source releases (Was: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0)

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > [dropped infra@, I believe most interested people are already on > general@] > > > > Let's decouple this thread from the specific issue of the ManifoldCF > > release. The

Re: AOO LICENSE/NOTICE files

y > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey >> wrote: > >>> I was a little surprised that the LICENSE file contained only the ALv2, and >>> that NOTICE points at the websites for dependencie

Re: Request for an early review of an potential Apache OpenOffice release

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > 2012/3/13 Jürgen Schmidt : >> we have prepared a new developer snapshot on the way to our first release. > > Congratulations on your progress so far! > And thanks for reviewing out dev snapshot build. >> We would very much appreciate som

Re: [SITE] CMS cutover for incubator site on Monday

On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > I'll be cutting over the incubator site to > svnpubsub based on the CMS this coming Monday. > Please be advised this will impact the workflow > for publishing stuff: instead of committing build > output to site-publish and svn upping the tree

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating(RC7)

On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > =0 (abstain, non-binding [;<) from me. > > With a different build configuration, I have matching results to the > successful builds reported by others.  I don't know enough to interpret the > outcome or the console-message details that oc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating(RC7)

2011/12/27 Devin Han : > Hi all, > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit > (incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for > ODF Toolkit in Apache. > > This release candidate fixes the pom.xml file inconsistant issue found in > RC6. Thanks Y

Re: Non English Mailing Lists

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:34 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to clarify if Non-English Mailing lists are allowed. > > Background: I missed in our Proposal the Mailing List: > http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-en-espanol/about?hl=en_US > We made now a Vote on our D

Re: timeline of Apache Incubator history

On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] >> Sent: Saturday, 22 October 2011 8:03 AM >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: timeline of Apache Incubator h

Re: timeline of Apache Incubator history

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:57 AM, David Crossley wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> David Crossley wrote: >> > >> > Please see >> > http://incubator.apache.org/history/ >> > >> > This is a Timeplot chart of the number of projects >> > handle

Re: timeline of Apache Incubator history

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:03 AM, David Crossley wrote: > Please see > http://incubator.apache.org/history/ > > This is a Timeplot chart of the number of projects > handled by the Incubator. > > The "green" line shows the "Count podlings entered incubation". > The "yellow" line shows the "Total pod

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation

2011/8/9 Ying Chun Guo : > > Nick Burch 写于 08/09/2011 06:47:05 PM: > >> Nick Burch >> 08/09/2011 06:47 PM >> >> Please respond to >> general@incubator.apache.org >> >> To >> >> general@incubator.apache.org >> >> cc >> >> Subject >> >> Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation >> >> On

Apache ODF Toolkit Podling Status Report (Draft)

Devin noticed that we have our first status report due to the Apache Board tomorrow (Wed). But we don't have an Apache mailing list to discuss this yet. So, I've pasted Devin's draft into the wiki. You can review it here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011Search for "ODFToolkit". Obv

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>> As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down, >>> I would like to initiate the vote to accept the ODF Toolkit as an >>>

Re: [VOTE] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation

> > Please cast your votes: > > [  ] +1 Accept ODF Toolkit for incubation > [  ] +0 Indifferent to ODF Toolkit incubation > [  ] -1 Reject ODF Toolkit for incubation > +1 Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote: >>> >>> Can we do this for now?  If anyone is committed to the project and >>> able to contribute, please respond to this note with some indication >>> of your interest.  The proposers can the

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > +1 on the proposal > > But comment though on the mailing lists you asked for, I updated them, > so would you please take a look. In brief the changes are: > > 1- You missed adding odf-private@ which is for Podling Project > Management

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal This proposal was sent to the Apache Incubator list a week ago. It was suggested that the PDFBox and Tiki projects should be contacted as well, to make members aware of this proposal. If you have comments, please follow up to general@incubator.

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Kazunari Hirano wrote: > +1 > >> == Background == >> The ODF Toolkit Union was jointly announced by Sun and IBM at the >> OpenOffice.org Conference in Beijing, November 2008. > https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/jhpOvocJCrShDVkE8lObEQ?feat=directlink > https://p

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown wrote: >>> Rob Weir wrote: >>>> And I've added it to the wiki: >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitPropos

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote: > >> Rob Weir wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown >>> wrote: >>>> Rob Weir wrote: >>>>> And I

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

2011/7/22 Jürgen Schmidt : > Hi Rob, > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher >> wrote: >> > >> > On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote: >> > >> >> Rob Weir wrot

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote: > >> Rob Weir wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown >>> wrote: >>>> Rob Weir wrote: >>>>> And I

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

eir ID's will require some care. >  4. Can we know the contact e-mail and current iCLA status of the initial > committers? > Yes, we can work on that. >  - Dennis > > -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > Sent: Thursday, July

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> And I've added it to the wiki: >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal >> >> -Rob > > What can I do to help? > Good question. Once the project is set up, there will

Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

And I've added it to the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal -Rob On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > Apologies to those who have received multiple copies of this message. > I've cc'ed members of the Apache POI project, the Apache Ope

[PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation

tifications ===Other resources=== A source code repository, preferable git An issue tracker A wiki A website ==Initial Committers== Rob Weir Biao Han Svante Schubert Ying Chun Guo ==Sponsors== ===Champion=== Sam Ruby ===Nominated M

Re: ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal

We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far has been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the Incubation proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL component and he confirmed that it is not really active anymore. He might move it to bitbucket. So

Re: [PROPOSAL] Oozie for the Apache Incubator

And I was thinking of the Ray Ozzie, the former Microsoft CTO. Elephant handler is perhaps apt. -Riob On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:22:39AM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: >> You might want to reconsider the name. >> >> In English (British Engli

Re: ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400: >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf >> wrote: >> > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400: >> >> Hi Dennis, >&g

Fwd: ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal

other languages (e.g. Python, the existing C#, etc.). Juergen On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > I'm cc'ing the POI and OpenOffice projects, inviting them to join this > discussion on the Incubator general list: general@incubator.apache.org > > When we were dis

Re: ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400: >> Hi Dennis, >> >> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove >> these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a singl

Re: ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal

tware > "* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT > "* WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. > "* > "* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and > "* limitations un

Re: ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Lee Fisher wrote: >> There is activity.  It just is not evenly distributed. > [...] > > I presume the activity is more in the Java libraries. :-) > I not asking you to presume anything. I'm just following up on interest expressed on this list a few weeks ago. I

Re: ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal

appreciate this is not yet a proposal, this is a discussion that might > answer these questions. > Thanks, I appreciate the questions. -Rob > Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) > > On 27 Jun 2011, at 20:42, Rob Weir wrote: > >> I'm cc'ing the POI

ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal

I'm cc'ing the POI and OpenOffice projects, inviting them to join this discussion on the Incubator general list: general@incubator.apache.org When we were discussing the OpenOffice proposal a few weeks ago I mentioned that there was another set of technology called the ODF Toolkit, that we might w