Hi all,
The vote has passed with 4 binding +1 PMC votes and no other votes.
- Julian Hyde
- Zili Chen (tison)
- PJ Fanning
- Yonglun Zhang
With these votes and the support from the IPMC in our graduation
DISCUSS thread [1], I'll be closing this vote now and presenting our
TLP resolution to the B
Hi everyone,
Just a quick reminder that this vote is still open.
Thanks,
Riley
On 2024/03/15 22:18:34 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the positive feedback we received in the DISCUSS thread [1],
> we would like to open the official VOTE to graduate now.
>
> Be
Hi Justin,
> You might want to remove those old releases there, as they are automatically
> archived here:
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/sdap/
Would that affect the closer.lua download links on our website?
-Riley
On 2024/03/20 23:39:49 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In SDAPs c
ct:
- Edward M Armstrong
- Nga Thien Chung
- Thomas Cram
- Frank Greguska
- Thomas Huang
- Julian Hyde
- Joseph C. Jacob
- Jason Kang
- Riley Kuttruff
- Thomas G Loubrieu
- Kevin Marlis
- Stepheny Perez
- Wai Linn Phyo
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Nga Thien Chung
be a
Hi Xuanwo,
Thank you for finding these missing license headers, I've opened a PR to address
this for our next release. Did you use an automated tool to find these? That
would be
helpful for evaluating and preparing future release candidates.
Thanks,
Riley
On 2024/03/11 02:45:50 Xuanwo wrote:
>
essed your question adequately. If not, let me know.
-Riley
On 2024/02/29 05:53:44 Xuanwo wrote:
> Hi, Riley Kuttruff
>
> Thank you very much to the SDAP PPMC for maintaining this project!
>
> Three releases (one ongoing) in seven years seems a bit sparse from my
> perspective
ch
we are extremely grateful!
On 2024/02/28 05:35:57 Calvin Kirs wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 11:43 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > Thank you very much. We have actually found an issue with that release (GPL
> > licensed dependency) and have been working on preparing ano
had a look at the mailing lists and the community seems in a pretty good
> > state.
> >
> > As a matter of interest, are you still looking at completing the v1.2.0
> > release [1]? If so, I could have a look at the RC over the weekend.
> >
> > [1] https:/
2nrycqcw
>
> On 2024/02/22 18:01:31 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Apache SDAP joined Incubator in October 2017. In the time since, we've
> > made significant progress towards maturing our community and our
> > project and adopting the Apache W
de
- Joseph C. Jacob
- Jason Kang
- Riley Kuttruff
- Thomas G Loubrieu
- Kevin Marlis
- Stepheny Perez
- Wai Linn Phyo
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Nga Thien Chung
be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache SDAP, to serve in
accordance with and subject to the direc
Thanks Justin, Chris!
I've been experimenting with trying to avoid the installation of the GPL
package, and for the main dependency, it seems to not be causing any loss of
functionality, though we will have to tweak how we install that dependency. As
I understand it, though, it would be accepta
I was performing a more thorough check of our dependencies in preparation of
opening graduation discussions with the Incubator PMC and found at least one
package that, while not directly used in the code, is installed as a dependency
of multiple top-level dependencies that is LGPL licensed. The
This is what I've found:
Our code does not explicitly install or use chardet; however, some of the
dependencies our code does install/use have chardet as a dependency and may be
using it.
I believe I've identified all the dependencies resulting in chardet being
installed and am working to upd
Hi Justin,
I checked more thoroughly and that requirements file doesn't appear to be used
anywhere so I've deleted it. However, I did also check the docker images built
from this release candidate and found chardet installed in a number of them
(not explicitly, but in the installation process o
Ah, ok. Thank you.
We'll be updating the download page soon and I'll be sure to include this
change.
-Riley
On 2023/05/15 05:54:37 Calvin Kirs wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:24 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > Hi Calvin,
> >
> > Thanks for pointing th
I apologize, but which is the incorrect link? Is it the dist.apache.org one?
On 2023/05/15 05:19:56 Calvin Kirs wrote:
> Hi Podlings,
>
> Note that the links to the checksum and signature must not be to the
> mirror selector, but must be direct to downloads.apache.org.
>
> I noticed that StreamP
Hi Calvin,
Thanks for pointing that out. I'll get it addressed for the next vote threads.
-Riley
On 2023/05/15 05:19:56 Calvin Kirs wrote:
> Hi Podlings,
>
> Note that the links to the checksum and signature must not be to the
> mirror selector, but must be direct to downloads.apache.org.
>
>
Hello,
This vote has been open for about 9 days and has so far received one binding
vote from our project mentor. We will need an additional 2 binding votes to be
able to close this thread.
Thank you,
Riley
On 2023/05/01 17:20:32 Nga Chung wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> This is a call for
Hello everyone,
The vote has passed with 3 binding +1 votes.
Binding +1 votes:
- Julian Hyde
- Justin McLean
- Gang Li
Binding -1 votes:
There were no -1 votes
Thank you everyone for your feedback and help with getting SDAP through to its
first official release. The SDAP team will take the ste
Hello everyone,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc3.
The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP
(incubating) version 1.0.0-rc3.
We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release.
SDAP community thread
https:/
Hello everyone,
The vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2 has failed to pass.
+1 votes:
- Julian Hyde
- John D. Ament
-1 votes:
- Justin Mclean
Other votes:
- Larry McCay (-0)
Thank you everyone for your feedback. The SDAP team has addressed the issues at
hand and is currently vo
If using DISCLAIMER-WIP, would we need to switch to that for all our release
artifacts? As far as I can see, the issues found in this thread that would
necessitate using the WIP disclaimer are present in 2 of the 3 artifacts.
Should the other artifact keep the standard DISCLAIMER?
On 2023/01/03
Just to be sure, you don't intend to only license the release
> branch's source as ASL, right?
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 9:28 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the notes.
> >
> > I would like to point out in regards to the missing ASF headers tha
; be solved in the next incubating release. If a few IPMC members
> > surface several issues this time around, the second release should be
> > much cleaner.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-570
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 202
Hello,
In consideration of the upcoming holiday weekend, let's extend this vote to
last to a week from now.
Thank you,
Riley
On 2022/12/23 03:19:10 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version
> 1.0.0-rc2
Hello everyone,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2.
The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP
(incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2.
We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release.
SDAP community vote thread:
h
26 matches
Mail list logo
