Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

Hi Olivier, inline... On 06/09/2021 00:49, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi The Apache Maven project has voted [1] the donation of the mvndaemon project [2]. Following the IP clearance process [3] this is a lazy consensus majority vote, open for at least 72 hours. Please vote to accept this contribut

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Looking forward to work on this! Thanks, Hans-Peter > Am 13.02.2019 um 08:57 schrieb Lars Francke : > > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the Training project in [1] and [2]. The > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

would like to see in this project. Kind regards, Hans-Peter > Am 25.01.2019 um 13:49 schrieb Lars Francke : > > Hello everyone, > > this is the result of the discussion I started in December 2018[1]. > > I would like to start this thread to get feedback on a proposal we

Re: Showcase your project at ApacheCON: consider Podling Shark Tank

Roman. Would you also add me please. PeterScanlon. I would like to add Apache Milagro (incubating) to the list to talks. Thank you. > On 26 Apr 2016, at 03:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > I've just added AdamBordelon wiki ID to the access page. > > Thanks, > Roman. > >> On Mon, Apr 25, 20

Re: Document No 0890302

no document attached. R U a spammer ? On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Accounts wrote: > Thanks for using electronic billing > > Please find your document attached > > Regards > > Accounts > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge

Re: Post mortem request for the handling of the Corinthia podling (was Re: FYI, I have subscribed to this list and to your private list)

> On 16 Jan 2016, at 12:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Probably too late, but some comments in-line. > > On 1/15/16, 6:55 AM, "Peter Kelly" wrote: >> >> However, one important factor which really killed things for us was the >> inability to use Qt. &

Re: Post mortem request for the handling of the Corinthia podling (was Re: FYI, I have subscribed to this list and to your private list)

erate how they want. ASF espouses the mantra “community over code”, but in reality it’s “restrictive policies over community over code”. My experience has been that if it’s necessary to destroy (or rather “jettison”) a community or project in order to ensure such a policy is enforced, th

Re: podlings and github

ator (requiring them to go back to their previous Github organisation), and the Apache policy on having two renames for their project, which damages their brand if people find broken links on the internet. Thanks, Peter [1] https://github.com/commons-rdf/commons-rdf [2] https://github.com/apache/

Re: [NOTICE] corinthia PPMC+committer -= dortef, franz, gbg, ianc, jani, louis, pmkelly

> On 7 Sep 2015, at 1:17 am, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 06.09.2015 19:43, Peter Kelly wrote: >> If it’s not possible to write apps using LGPL libraries as part of apache >> projects, > > I expect you did get to read this page: > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolve

Re: [NOTICE] corinthia PPMC+committer -= dortef, franz, gbg, ianc, jani, louis, pmkelly

sktop apps, unless you write your own toolkit. I realise OpenOffice has it’s own custom toolkit which is still used for historical reasons, but I don’t think that can adapt well to mobile platforms, so other than that that there don’t seem to be any viable choices which could work with the poli

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

do have the advantage of Java-8 default methods, so we can also add to the API while maintaining backwards compatibility, so we are open for additions even after the initial version of the API is finalised. >> * Sergio Fernández (wikier dot apache dot org) >> * Andy Seaborne (andy dot apache

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Incubate TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

Awesome work Marko and all, great work and fantastic outcome! /peter G: neubauer.peter S: peter.neubauer P: +46 704 106975 L: http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer T: @peterneubauer <http://twitter.com/peterneubauer> Open Data- @mapillary <http://mapillary.com> Open Sou

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

> On 4 Dec 2014, at 1:07 am, Peter Kelly wrote: > >> desires have been expressed on the AOO mailing list however that for many of >> the things Corinthia aims to do, a complete re-write would be the most >> viable option. Just to clarify - what I was referring to was

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

al or open source) on top of the libraries, according to the terms of the Apache license. -- Dr. Peter M. Kelly kelly...@gmail.com http://www.kellypmk.net/ PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key> (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)

Request for wiki access

tor/CorinthiaProposal>). Thanks -- Dr. Peter M. Kelly kelly...@gmail.com http://www.kellypmk.net/ PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key> (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)

[RESULT][IP CLEARANCE] Apache UIMA TextMarker contribution to Apache UIMA

Closing this vote after the 72 hour period. The lazy consensus vote passes with no -1 having been cast. This completes the IP clearance process for Apache UIMA TextMarker. Thanks! Peter On 10.01.2013 10:40, Peter Klügl wrote: Hi, the TextMarker [1] project has been contributed to the

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache UIMA TextMarker contribution to Apache UIMA

[4] * A vote has passed on the dev at uima.a.o mailing list [6] The clearance passes by lazy consensus if no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours. Thanks, Peter Klügl [1] http://textmarker.sourceforge.net/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2172 [3] https://svn.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Marmotta into the incubator

za, or through OWLAPI with my extensions that have not yet been accepted into the OWLAPI trunk. May be easier to avoid saying "Although" altogether. Good luck Marmotta team! Cheers, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: gener

Re: key signing

Greg Stein wrote on 10/10/12 6:44 PM: > I've read this entire thread (whew!), and would actually like to throw out > a contrary position: > > No signed keys. +1 -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ .

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.3.0-incubating

ES11SP1 and it went smoothly with no errors or issues. Thanks, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT] [VOTE] Lucy as TLP

After 72+ hours, the VOTE is closed with 6 binding +1s, no 0s or -1s. Binding +1: Chris Hostetter (Mentor) Mike McCandless Alan D. Cabrera Joe Schaefer (Mentor) Chris Mattmann (Mentor) Jukka Zitting -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . pe...@peknet.com

[VOTE] Lucy as TLP

ted to serve as the initial members of the Apache Lucy Project: * Logan Bell * Brad C. Harder * Marvin Humphrey * Peter Karman * Nathan Kurz * Dan Markham * Mike McCandless * Joe Schaefer * U

[DISCUSS] Graduation of Lucy to TLP

heers, pek [0] http://s.apache.org/ViC [1] http://s.apache.org/KUX [2] http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/LucyCharter [3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucy.html -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . pe...@peknet.com ---

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.3.0 released

ASF projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF. Regards, Peter Karman, on behalf of the Apache Lucy development team and community -- Peter Karman

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.3.0 RC 1

Peter Karman wrote on 1/30/12 8:51 PM: > > Apache Lucy PPMC vote thread: > > http://s.apache.org/uot > +1 Marvin Humphrey *+ +1 Chris Mattman *+ +1 Chris Hostetter *+ +1 David E. Wheeler * +1 Nick Wellnhofer * +1 Logan Bell * * indicates Lucy PPMC membe

[VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.3.0 RC 1

Peter Karman wrote on 1/30/12 8:51 PM: > Apache Lucy PPMC vote thread: > > http://s.apache.org/uot > > +1 Marvin Humphrey*+ > +1 Peter Karman* > +1 Chris Mattmann*+ > +1 Chris Hostetter*+ > +1 David E. Wheeler* > +1 Dan Markham* > &

[VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.3.0 RC 1

s, and for information on ASF voting procedures, see: http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleaseVerification http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleasePrep http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Apache Lucy PPMC vote thread: http://s.apache.org/uot +1 Marvin Humphrey*+ +1 Peter Karm

Re: Welcome Anne Kathrine Petterøe and Dave Fisher as Incubator PMC members

Excellent news, welcome and thanks for volunteering as mentors Anne and Dave! - Peter On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm pleased to announce that Anne and Dave have been elected by the > Incubator PMC to be members of that PMC. >

Re: [VOTE] Flex to join the Apache Incubator

+1 - Peter On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Incubator PMC members (*), > > I've just reviewed the "[PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator" thread > and I think all relevant issues have been adressed no

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

posal. As far as I am aware Tamarin / AVM2 is compatible with everything AS3 onwards including Flex. - Peter On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Raju Bitter wrote: > Leo, > > I agree with you that Flex is different in that it's targeting a > proprietary VM. That's why I t

Re: Looking for mentors for Flex (was: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator)

Having Anne as a mentor would be fantastic - thanks for volunteering, hope you can make it in! Think its a definite plus to have some mentors with a solid background knowledge of Flex and the existing community. - Peter On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe wrote: >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.2.2 released

a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF. Regards, Peter Karman, on behalf of the Apache Lucy

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.2.2 RC 1

I declare this VOTE thread closed after the requisite 72 hours. The VOTE passed with 7 +1 votes, including 3 binding IPMC votes: http://s.apache.org/zic +1 Marvin Humphrey*+ +1 Peter Karman* +1 Chris Mattmann*+ +1 Chris Hostetter*+ +1 David E. Wheeler* +1 Dan Markham

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.2.0-incubating RC2

+1 Builds and installs fine. On 11/04/2011 05:04 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote: > On 11/04/2011 02:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> This takes care of Patrick's RAT concerns. From now on you can run RAT by: >> $ mvn -Prelease install >> at the top level of a project. This is THE only change between RC1

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.2.0-incubating

p-datanode hadoop-jobtracker > hadoop-tasktracker ; do sudo service $i start ; done > $ sudo -u hdfs hadoop fs -mkdir /user/$USER > $ sudo -u hdfs hadoop fs -chown $USER /user/$USER > $ hadoop fs -lsr / >

[VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.2.2 RC 1

s, and for information on ASF voting procedures, see: http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleaseVerification http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleasePrep http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Apache Lucy PPMC vote thread: http://s.apache.org/zic +1 Marvin Humphrey*+ +1 Peter Karm

Re: Request: Can "proposed committers" introduce themselves?

Hi, My name is Peter Korn, and I've been working on accessibility for the last 20 years.  I started that career developing assistive technologies for folks with vision impairments, and then moved to Sun where I worked on platform accessibility frame

[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache River 2.1.2

ho you are), whose efforts have made this latest release possible. Cheers, Peter Firmstone. Peter Firmstone wrote: Please vote on releasing Apache River 2.1.2 The voting period is open, due to the size of the River release, it will remain open until it passes with a majority of at least three

[VOTE] Release Apache River 2.1.2

Please vote on releasing Apache River 2.1.2 The voting period is open, due to the size of the River release, it will remain open until it passes with a majority of at least three +1 River Incubator PMC votes or until a valid objection causes its rejection. All are encouraged to show their sup

[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache River 2.1.2

But when I post the Release artifacts to vote again, lets make some noise! In the mean time, if you know some people who have dropped out of view recently let them know we need their support. Cheers, Peter. Peter Firmstone wrote: Please vote on releasing Apache River 2.1.2 The voting peri

[VOTE] Release Apache River 2.1.2

Please vote on releasing Apache River 2.1.2 The voting period is extended until Saturday the 27th of February 2010 and passes if a majority of at least three +1 River Incubator PMC votes are cast. The vote has been extended due to the size of this release and the subsequent time needed for re

[VOTE] Release Apache River 2.1.2

A candidate for the Apache River 2.1.2 Release is available at http://people.apache.org/~peter_firmstone/ The release candidate sources are zip / tar.gz archives of the sources in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/river/jtsk/trunk/ The SHA1 checksums are: apache-river-2.1.2-incubatin

New project

server-based (Solaris) version of ReforMath can be found here: http://jaskolskit.facebook.joyent.us/. You can download both programs: http://jaskolskit.facebook.joyent.us/reformath.zip and http://jaskolskit.facebook.joyent.us/svgconvlib.zip. I hope to hear from you. Thanks, Peter Frane Jr

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

HI Jeremy, I have added seven names to the wiki as per your instructions : Bernd Kolb Dimo Stoilov Kiril Mitov Nikolai Tankov Peter Peshev Sabine Heider Violeta Georgieva The people have worked on various modules from SAP's Java EE certified server, from SAP's SCA implentation as we

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

Hi Jeremy, Yes, I would try to do that on Monday morning Best Regards Peter On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > As discussion is settling down, I'd like to aim for Tuesday next week > (15 Sept) to call a vote. > > Peter, does that give you time to supply

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

a JMS scenario but the same model is valid to the other stuff if there is interest to integrate - JCA, web services, proprietary SCA bindings for backend connectivity, etc.. Is this correct, or I am describing something totally new and different than what you are proposing? Best regards Peter

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

reation in the JMS broker and the deployment. Best regards Peter On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > 2009/9/8 Peter Peshev : >> Hi Jeremy, >> >> Since you are asking about potential committers - at least to me a new >> OSGi project focused on Java

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

Hi Jeremy, Thanks , we would need a few more days to finalize all the participants from our side, some people are on vacation this week . Maybe it could be even a bigger number. Is there a deadline ? Best Regards Peter On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > Hi Pe

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

side has experience in Apache project , but I hope that’s not an issue. Best Regards Peter Peshev On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > Cross-pollination and help from the Felix community have been talked > about several times and I absolutely welcome that. As such, ple

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

with JMS (i.e. ActiveMQ) , JCA resource adapters , or addressing the usecase for integration of non-Apache Java EE components (EclipseLink, etc.). Would you consider these as in scope for the project ? Best Regards Peter Peshev On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > Cr

Re: Java Jabber Server

XMPP peers. /peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator

On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: I took a peek at plexus and picocontainer mailing lists. One thing of note is that there seems to have been little discussion on the picocontainer lists about a move to Apache. Perhaps discussions were offline, but it's not clear to me how the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator

On Oct 22, 2007, at 12:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: As mentioned previously, both containers are heavily used, both have always lived as open source projects. Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. [ ] +1 Accept Compo

Re: Apache Composer Proposal

On Oct 8, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: I am watching http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal with some interest. A couple of items: 1) JAMES uses Phoenix, which is the old name for Plexus yes, Loom was unsuccessful Phoenix fork. iirc, Plexus borrowed concepts from

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 4)

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:08:18PM -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote: > [...] > > We ask that you please vote to approve this release: > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 > [ ] -1 Issue detected (please provide details) +1 > [...] -- Peter Jones IONA Techno

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 03:51:48PM -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote: > [...] > > We ask that you please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) > +1 Cheers, Peter

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

cubation, or (incubating) where the project name was mentioned in a couple of places... Regards, Peter -- Peter Jones IONA Technologies Inc. E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: (w) 709-738-3725 x22 | Fax: 709-738-3745 84-86 Elizabeth Ave. St. John's,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

+1 Cheers, Peter On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:12:17PM -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote: > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and published builds here: > > Binaries and Source Distributions: > http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/<http://people.apache.org/%7

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

On Nov 6, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: I myself am +0 as I don't follow the project but am in favor of fall/spring/periodic cleanups in general. However, I would not be at ease retiring a project without hearing from its mentor, who's yet to vote on this thread. AltRMI pre-dates mento

[VOTE] Retire AltRMI

The AltRMI podling, has become stagnant. Here is a vote to move it into retirement. [ ] -1 : It lives on, you someone missed my recent commits on it last week [ ] 0 : I don't do fall cleansing [ ] +1 : Move to retirement Here's my +1 -p

Re: [VOTE] [UPDATE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Well, I just expressed my opinion as an ASF member, because this project and their mentors show no respect to the other members feelings about it. It is possible to respect other's feelings without agreeing with them. That's the case here. I

[HttpNIO] MINA and AsyncWeb

(resending since i think my first try didn't get noticed by the httpclient-dev moderators) howdy! I'm writing to see if there is interest in collaborating in a larger effort to develop HTTP code that utilizes NIO. MINA is a framework here a

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 17, 2006, at 5:31 AM, Dave Irving wrote: One thing I would like to discuss though is identity AsyncWeb currently has some form of identity in its own right as a project (and is already bundled as a standalone http transport in a couple of OSS projects). Is this likely to be affecte

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 14, 2006, at 4:05 AM, Dave Irving wrote: One thing which would be good to discuss still I think is location: E.g, are we proposing to bring AsyncWeb within Mina, or as a separate incubating project? My thought was to bring within MINA, let it flourish, and then have it leave MINA o

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 15, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Honestly, I'd recommend flipping it: get MINA to be TLP first and then move in AsyncWeb. There's no reason that AsyncWeb should land in the Directory TLP and then move again in short-order. Good point. If you submit the resolution ASAP, i

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: It almost sounds like this would be a good candidate for a software grant instead of meriting a full incubation. How large of a community is around AsyncWeb? From the proposal, it sounds just like one committer - so as long as the IP cleara

Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

On Jul 13, 2006, at 2:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal, we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for consideration. The proposal can be foun

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Thomas Dudziak wrote: On 7/12/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You might also want to CC Filip Hanik, [EMAIL PROTECTED], on this idea. Filip has been busily working on a NIO HTTP implementation for Tomcat, and has a working version. We've seen some qui

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote: You might also want to CC Filip Hanik, [EMAIL PROTECTED], on this idea. Filip has been busily working on a NIO HTTP implementation for Tomcat, and has a working version. We've seen some quirky performance out of it. But that's besides the point

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 12, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Can you please ping the Jakarta HttpComponents folks? see what they think? done! (cc'd here as its a good place for common discussion) -pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic sig

[HttpNIO] MINA and AsyncWeb

howdy! I'm writing to see if there is interest in collaborating in a larger effort to develop HTTP code that utilizes NIO. MINA is a framework here at the ASF for developing clients and servers based on NIO. There is also the AsyncWeb

[pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

I have been talking with Dave Irving who is the principal developer behind AsyncWeb, , an HTTP engine built upon MINA , on bringing the project to the ASF. I've started a proposal at

Re: 'protocols' sub-module of MINA

On Jul 3, 2006, at 12:10 PM, James Strachan wrote: On 7/3/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Syn

Re: 'protocols' sub-module of MINA

On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Trustin Lee wrote: Bringing in AsyncWeb and other possible future contributions will make this project quite too big to fit into a subproject. We might need an incubation process to find a better place for MINA eventually. Any idea? I will CC this message to

Re: Renaming Heraldry

In the spirit of bob blakely¹s presentation at catalyst, how about sibyl or sibyllic As in an oracle? =peterd On 6/30/2006 4:43 AM, "Recordon, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The reason we've leaned against naming it after a specific technology is that > we don't want the name to limit

mentoring celtixfire

i'm volunteering to help mentor celtixfire, i've added myself to the list in the wiki. -pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heraldry Identity Project

On 6/20/2006 12:55 PM, "Drummond Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dims, > > I am very familiar with the SAML and OpenSAML problems; on this message I'm > cc'ing Peter Davis of NeuStar who has been helping to try to overcome those > for several years (wi

Re: incubating jabberd2?

lved. ;-) The jabberd2 developers know about the licensing requirement and are fully willing to switch to ALv2. The number of contributors has been fairly small, with no long-lost contributors who would need to be tracked down etc., so I think the switch-over should be fairly straightforward. Pe

Re: incubating jabberd2?

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: I forgot to ask .. are there any companies involved or is this a project of a collection of developers? No companies (yet), just freelance open-source developers. Peter smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

incubating jabberd2?

em to develop a proposal. [1] http://jabberd.jabberstudio.org/2/ Thoughts? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

On Nov 9, 2003, at 3:59 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: At the end a community vote decides the codebase to adopt or we can as well be left with just one proposal. This is what I had in mind from the beginning; what do you think? Repo != a codebase. Its just a spec. I don't think 'forced convergen

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

On Nov 9, 2003, at 1:52 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: We need CPAN, or apt-get, or fink, or something slightly more dependency aware but not so much so that we sit on our thumbs waiting for it to happen. ... there are no methods of storing large objects more efficient than a modern filesystem. St

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

On Nov 7, 2003, at 11:29 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: The developers of Ruper in the meantime have become Apache committers (two for Gump and one is coming in with JUDDI). The issue here is that Maven already has some code for this, and http://greebo.sourceforge.net/ is partecipating too. If y

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

On Nov 7, 2003, at 4:15 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Proposal: This is a new kind of incubation that I'd like to try. It's not an established project that wants to come to Apache, rather an effort that wants to try and see if it can work, similar to Geronimo but coming mainly from Apache commit

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

mmon naming and directory APIs to all be integrated into > the db project? I believe that he was saying that if you were to build a specialized hierarchial database that could be used outside the context of a directory server then it would be good to eventually migrate it to db.apache.org -- Che

Re: cvs commit: incubator-site/build/site/projects/altrmi/api/org/apache/altrmi/server/impl/socket AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer.html AbstractPartialSocketStreamServer.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedBinder.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedConnection.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamServer.html

On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 10:19 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: can the docs be reproduced locally into the same usable format as they exist on the site, using a tool that anyone reading the docs would automatically have? yes. with that said, I like having javadocs on a website. For new p

Re: [altrmi] Bug in AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer

On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 05:53 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Peter Royal wrote, On 15/03/2003 23.46: I found a bug in the AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer. Peter, we should move these development mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's not your fault, the documentation is lacking. Didn&#

Re: [altrmi] Bug in AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer

On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 05:55 PM, Paul Hammant wrote: Ooooh, been looking for something like that. Marathon ( http://marathonman.sourceforge.net/ ) is being bugged by an issue that sounds like it be caused by that. Lets go for START & STOP. The intermediate states were just just over-d

[altrmi] Bug in AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer

te is STARTING? -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]