Re: [VOTE] Graduate OpenJPA to a Top Level Project

2007-05-08 Thread Patrick Linskey
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the OpenJPA PMC: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Craig Russel

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

2007-04-25 Thread Patrick Linskey
Also, it's probably worth pointing out that schemas-doctype.rsrc is OpenJPA IP, and not a redistribution of someone else's IP. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, togethe

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

2007-04-25 Thread Patrick Linskey
y attributed in LICENSE.txt. > java-keywords.rsrc does not contain IP. To my knowledge, this is not discussed in the release. > schemas-doctype.rsrc does contain IP, however the parser for > this file does not support comments. Ditto for this file. -Patrick

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

2007-04-25 Thread Patrick Linskey
one of the binary jars that OpenJPA depends on. So, the notification (and text in the license file) is describing licensing limitations imposed on OpenJPA as a distributor of serp, and does not have any impact on the code in the OpenJPA svn repository. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Sy

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

2007-04-24 Thread Patrick Linskey
I don't think that my vote counts on this alias, but hey, I'll vote anyways: +1 -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain informatio

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

2007-04-24 Thread Patrick Linskey
FWIW, I think that RAT was run at some point during the process. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

2007-04-24 Thread Patrick Linskey
t summer. Details should be on file; Geir should know where everything landed. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems

RE: [VOTE][SECOND ATTEMPT] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

2006-11-27 Thread Patrick Linskey
+1, btw. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be

RE: [VOTE][SECOND ATTEMPT] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

2006-11-27 Thread Patrick Linskey
> release notes are an important form of guerilla advertising for open > source projects. the content can be reused for the download page and > for announcements. either they are too hard for me to find or aren't > included. FYI, we aren't including any currently, as everything is new -- this is t

RE: [VOTE][SECOND ATTEMPT] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

2006-11-26 Thread Patrick Linskey
mmeaux Kevin Sutter Craig Russell Patrick Linskey Eddie O'Neil 0 votes: 0 -1 votes: 0 Sorry about the confusion, -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with

RE: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

2006-11-26 Thread Patrick Linskey
So out of curiosity, do you do this just for the incubator release vote, or do you go through the same process for the votes on your PMC list as well? If the same, do you anticipate going through the same process for votes after incubation? -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc

RE: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

2006-11-21 Thread Patrick Linskey
rstanding that only final bits are voted on. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries

RE: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

2006-11-21 Thread Patrick Linskey
> > Hi, > > > > I agree with Marc that we should continue to iterate on the > > 0.9.6-incubating release until we get it right. It would only be > > confusing if we actually publish the incubating release and > then publish > > another 0.9.6. But iterations on the release candidate > aren't n

RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

2006-11-16 Thread Patrick Linskey
Hi, Does anyone else have any showstopping concerns? It'd be good to know about them now, so that we can fix all of them and then re-run the three-day vote on the OpenJPA list. Thanks, -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems

RE: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

2006-11-16 Thread Patrick Linskey
+1 -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential

RE: [PROPOSAL] Open JPA

2006-03-07 Thread Patrick Linskey
See comments inline. > > :Core Developers: > > Fourteen of the initial committers are BEA employees. One > of those is > > a committer on the Apache JDO project. We anticipate that five of > > these fourteen will be involved in the core code > development, and the > > other nine will be invol

[PROPOSAL] Open JPA

2006-03-07 Thread Patrick Linskey
-Patrick Patrick Linskey (plinskey at bea dot com) and Eddie O'Neil (ekoneil at apache dot org) Project Proposal Open JPA will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Java Persistence API (JPA) which is defined as part of JSR-220. Rationale = We think that Open J