RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
OpenJPA PMC:
Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Craig Russel
Also, it's probably worth pointing out that schemas-doctype.rsrc is
OpenJPA IP, and not a redistribution of someone else's IP.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
___
Notice: This email message, togethe
y attributed in LICENSE.txt.
> java-keywords.rsrc does not contain IP.
To my knowledge, this is not discussed in the release.
> schemas-doctype.rsrc does contain IP, however the parser for
> this file does not support comments.
Ditto for this file.
-Patrick
one of the binary jars that OpenJPA depends on. So, the
notification (and text in the license file) is describing licensing
limitations imposed on OpenJPA as a distributor of serp, and does not
have any impact on the code in the OpenJPA svn repository.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Sy
I don't think that my vote counts on this alias, but hey, I'll vote
anyways:
+1
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
___
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
informatio
FWIW, I think that RAT was run at some point during the process.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
___
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc
t summer. Details
should be on file; Geir should know where everything landed.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
___
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems
+1, btw.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
___
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be
> release notes are an important form of guerilla advertising for open
> source projects. the content can be reused for the download page and
> for announcements. either they are too hard for me to find or aren't
> included.
FYI, we aren't including any currently, as everything is new -- this is
t
mmeaux
Kevin Sutter
Craig Russell
Patrick Linskey
Eddie O'Neil
0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 0
Sorry about the confusion,
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
___
Notice: This email message, together with
So out of curiosity, do you do this just for the incubator release vote,
or do you go through the same process for the votes on your PMC list as
well? If the same, do you anticipate going through the same process for
votes after incubation?
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc
rstanding that only
final bits are voted on.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
___
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries
> > Hi,
> >
> > I agree with Marc that we should continue to iterate on the
> > 0.9.6-incubating release until we get it right. It would only be
> > confusing if we actually publish the incubating release and
> then publish
> > another 0.9.6. But iterations on the release candidate
> aren't n
Hi,
Does anyone else have any showstopping concerns? It'd be good to know
about them now, so that we can fix all of them and then re-run the
three-day vote on the OpenJPA list.
Thanks,
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems
+1
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
___
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential
See comments inline.
> > :Core Developers:
> > Fourteen of the initial committers are BEA employees. One
> of those is
> > a committer on the Apache JDO project. We anticipate that five of
> > these fourteen will be involved in the core code
> development, and the
> > other nine will be invol
-Patrick
Patrick Linskey (plinskey at bea dot com) and Eddie O'Neil (ekoneil at
apache dot org)
Project Proposal
Open JPA will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Java Persistence
API
(JPA) which is defined as part of JSR-220.
Rationale
=
We think that Open J
17 matches
Mail list logo