On 19/11/12 01:01, Benson Margulies wrote:
Ted,
I did read the whole thing, and I'd like to join you in drawing a
curtain in front of the man.
The proposers of this project didn't create the problem of the term
'linked data', and they can't fix it. As you suggest, all they can do
is pick a TLP
Hi Ted,
in addition to the comments and links from Sebastian, I want to add
something myself.
On 17/11/12 22:49, Ted Dunning wrote:
Frankly, the phrase "linked data" is also so generic as to be essentially
meaningless outside your community. There are many, many uses of this
phrase in compute
The vote for Jena LARQ 1.0.0-incubating passes with 3 +1 IPMC votes.
+1's: IPMC:
* Benson Margulies
* Lea Simons
* Richard Frovarp
and 3 +1's (including Benson) from PPMC members on the jena-dev list [1].
0's
-1's
Thank you,
Paolo
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jen
ping
We still need one vote here.
Anyone willing to take a look at LARQ RC-1?
http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/
Thanks,
Paolo
Paolo Castagna wrote:
> Thank you Leo, thank you Benson.
> We still need one vote, I think...
>
> Cheers,
> Paolo
>
Thank you Leo, thank you Benson.
We still need one vote, I think...
Cheers,
Paolo
Leo Simons wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Paolo Castagna
> wrote:
>> here is a vote on a release for Apache Jena LARQ module:
>> jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating.
> ...
>> Proposed f
Hi,
here is a vote on a release for Apache Jena LARQ module:
jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating.
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open until:
Wednesday 4/April 23:59 UTC
(3 whole days: 72
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> Can we get 2 more IPMC votes?
>
> On a related note, who are currently mentoring Jena? The status page
> [1] doesn't show.
>
> The Jena team page [2] lists you, Bertrand, Benson and Ross as
> mentors. Is that a
Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 08/03/12 09:14, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>> Thank you ant.
>>
>> We still need 2 more votes, right?
>
> We need one more IPMC vote.
Ops, sorry about that.
>
> We have Benson on the project vote thread on jena-dev@i and ant from
> ge
Thank you ant.
We still need 2 more votes, right?
Paolo
ant elder wrote:
> +1
>
>...ant
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> The Jena PPMC has voted to release
>>
>> Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
>>
>> and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would revi
Hi,
first of all, it's good to see Any23 try to come into the Apache incubator.
Michele Mostarda wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On 4 September 2011 10:32, Nick Kew wrote:
>
>> On 3 Sep 2011, at 16:01, Davide Palmisano wrote:
>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Any23Proposal
>> Hmmm. Could've done w
Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal
Out of curiosity: Are there noteworthy relations to these projects?
Apache Stanbol
Apache Jena
Apache Clerezza
Cheers,
Andreas
My understanding so far is that:
Standbol --> Clerezza --> {Jena, Sesame, ...}
--> == depe
Steve Loughran wrote:
On 13/11/10 04:17, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
"The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html";
Browse
2/net/sourceforge/saxon/saxon/9.1.0.8/
(via: http://markmail.org/message/dq45eghp3luhfw22)
Paolo
the other items (CyberNeko, XML Commons) may be work to find the right
links ...
Jeremy
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
"The
org/maven2/nekohtml/nekohtml/0.9.5/
[6] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/xml-resolver/xml-resolver/1.2/
:-)
Paolo
Jeremy
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
"The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
"The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html";
Also, this relates to the release process and publishing of artifacts
in
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
The question about whether Apache would like to rethink our earlier
legal advice to require click through license agreement before executing
untrusted code in a sandbox should probably go to legal-discuss@ mailing
list, - at what point in the process should I initiate that
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
"The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html";
BrowserLauncher2 could be removed in favor of a much simpler approach
(i.e
Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 12/11/10 08:40, Nick Kew wrote:
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal
to accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text
of the proposal is copied here for your convenien
Olivier Grisel wrote:
On 8 November 2010 15:54, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
I'm following up on discussions here regarding relationships between
the incubating Clerezza podling and incoming Stanbol and Jena podlings
(see proposals at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator).
Do people agree with
19 matches
Mail list logo
