[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On 06/10/2011 06:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOf
On 02/04/2011 10:52 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Note the wording: "should".
Sometimes 72 hours is just too long, especially
for security related releases. In that (or any other
special) case RM can call for a shorter, or even
longer window.
Regard
[X] +1 to recommend Traffic Server's graduation
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 03/16/2010 12:22 AM, Nóirín Shirley for the ApacheCon 2010 Planning Team
wrote:
Dear PMC,
ApacheCon 2010 North America is just around the corner, and it's time
to roll out a program for this event! We'll be at the Westin Peachtree
Plaza in Atlanta, GA, from 1st-5th November. Will you be ther
On 03/10/2010 05:10 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache
trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha:
[X] +1 Publish
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Don't publish, because...
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscrib
On 03/05/2010 08:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache
trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha:
[X] +1 Publish
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Don't publish, because...
If not too late you have my +1
Regards
--
^TM
---
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Bertrand
I don't know how to get to the solution, which is "Three Responsible Mentors".
Some replies here are more suitable for that US agency
(I think it's called FEMA) that deals with worse case scenarios ;)
Pleas guys, give us a chance
Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1 (binding) on the singular change of dropping Mladen Turk and Nick Kew
as Mentors since that makes it 5 mentors, which is problematic (3 seems
to be the max).
Otherwise -1 (binding)
This is total nonsense.
You would -1 the project just because me and Nick expressed
the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
I'll be interested in this.
Would it be useful for me to don an ASF hat and offer to
help mentoring this? I'll also (naturally) be looking from
httpd/proxy eyes.
Don't we already have 3 Mentor? Any more would be counterpro
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Since our first draft, we've added a number of mentors and contributors,
and also added and improved on the proposal. I would like this to be
considered our official application, and that the Incubator votes (+ or
-) on our acceptance as a podling.
+1
Regards
--
^(TM
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:46 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
I'd like to join as well.
Great, so I can add you as a mentor as well?
Certainly. I'll be happy to help and participate.
We were looking for a mod_jk successor for a long time, and looking
at the descri
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Add me.
Sweet, thanks! I have updated the draft proposal with the three mentors
that we have so far. How many do we need before we could be considered
for a vote?
I'd like to join as well.
We were looking for a mod_jk successor for a long time,
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Mark Little wrote:
That kind of depends what you're used to now doesn't it? In some
circles really getting involved actively can best be done (can only be
done) with committer rights.
That's not how the ASF works or has ever worked.
Right,
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Well, I just expressed my opinion as an ASF member, because this
project and their mentors show no respect to the other members
feelings about it.
I don't think there is any disrespect but there may be a difference of
opinion but that's not the same thing. There's always
Jason van Zyl wrote:
So you wouldn't mind of mine humble non binding -1
vote. Like said, I don't have nothing against
that project, but like in many things in life
even the ASF seems to behave in the spirit of:
Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.
That's very sad :(
I don't think it's that hard t
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
So far we have 8 binding votes and I was wondering what the official
time period was for the voting window? Is it 72 hours as it is for
everything else? Just want to move on to the next phase of the process
if that is permissible at this point. Here are the votes that
Jim Jagielski wrote:
MINA is expected to propose a move to TLP soon... MINA
started off as a framework for ApacheDS and has grown into
its own very cool codebase.
I'd like to help here as well.
If that happens, I'm willing to help as well.
Although I'm not a huge fun of NIO in Servlet
cont
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
Anyway, I think it is important that we judge a person by what he does
rather than by what we think we know about him (and a satiric blog is
probably not a good source).
You are completely wrong with that.
There can be no healthy community without at least
minimal mutual
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Sorry about that. My bad :(.
difference between a person, and a public personality - and the blog in
question
clearly shows that this style is deliberately his 'public personality'.
Agreed. Perhaps I simply do not understand all
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And people in general shouldn't be discussed on this list.
Sorry about that. My bad :(.
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
While I haven't met Hani in person, I don't think it is ok to judge
him after his blog. After all it is satire (and damn funny at times).
Call me stupid. I don't find his stuff funny.
If he has some thoughts about the ASF, then he can
very well stay where he is nowadays.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 6/21/06, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That kind of person, has nothing in common
with anything ASF stands for thought.
ASF membership is distinct from committership. If Hani evidences
merit for a particular project as judged by his peers on the p
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 13:52 -0400, Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:
== Initial Committers ==
...
* Hani Suileman
Wow. Interesting. Never imagined Hani'd come our way. See for example
his latest masterpiece from
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/?anchor=defecating_on_a_jd
23 matches
Mail list logo
