Interesting. So the content at
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#incubator which says in
part that the "...basic requirements for incubation are...a working
codebase..." needs to be refreshed?
I don't mean to be argumentative. Just trying to understand the rules at
Apache.
> ---
> Big assumption right there. I'll assert there's a reasonable
> chance I understand what's under the hood of the Eclipse
> platform quite well. IIRC I helped the Equinox people decide
> on what to put in there at some point...
Mea culpa. I was reacting to the comment about the "heavyweight
> Please pardon me for being blunt, I don't really care about
> what happens inside IBM/Eclipse or who said what/when.
Dims,
Trust me, no one hates that bullshit more than I. I was just reacting to
Sam's assertion that Eclipse was fully informed and happy with outcome and
wanted to be precis
> > So your assertion is that all open source code should be done at
> > Apache and there are no reasonable scenarios in which another open
> > source community can or should attempt to co-operate with Apache?
>
> I don't believe that Sam said anything of the sort.
Really? I am truly not meanin
> In particular, why would taking Solomon's advice and dividing
> the child in half be benefitial (sic) to anybody?
Interesting question. So your assertion is that all open source code should
be done at Apache and there are no reasonable scenarios in which another
open source community can or sh
> Hmm. I think your email is more puzzling to me than the
> original proposal :-) (A heavyweight java-based IDE for doing
> what's essentially designed as "lightweight" stuff...
Leo,
It seems that your understanding of the Eclipse platform needs some
updating. The Java IDE is definitely what
t or who made you think discussions were "settled"?
Mike Milinkovich
Executive Director,
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
