Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Mathias Bauer
Sorry, this was a mistake, I used a wrong mail address; ignore this posting, please. regards, Mathias On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote: +1 (non-binding) Regards, Mathias On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote: *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Mathias Bauer
Sorry, I used a wrong mail address and then resent my vote with the correct one; please ignore this mail. Regards, Mathias On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote: +1 (non-binding) Regards, Mathias On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote: *** Please change your Subject: line for any

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Mathias Bauer
'' ||'''Email''' ||'''Affiliation''' ||'''iCLA''' || ||Kai Ahrens ||ka at openoffice dot org ||Individual !OpenOffice.org, [[http://graphics.openoffice.org|graphics.openoffice.org]] || || ||Eric Bachard |

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Mathias Bauer
'' ||'''Email''' ||'''Affiliation''' ||'''iCLA''' || ||Kai Ahrens ||ka at openoffice dot org ||Individual !OpenOffice.org, [[http://graphics.openoffice.org|graphics.openoffice.org]] || || ||Eric Bachard |

Re: Code covered by the Oracle grant

2011-06-10 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.06.2011 14:22, Mathias Bauer wrote: On 07.06.2011 13:00, Nóirín Plunkett wrote: On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: If there was still too much concern about that, I could work on an improved list from a technical perspective and provide this list in a few days. I don&#

Re: A little OOo history

2011-06-08 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.06.2011 17:13, Danese Cooper wrote: It's a lot of code as well. When we launched it took a day (as in 24 hours) to build. I'd imagine that situation will have improved somewhat Indeed, fortunately. And before the "24 hours build" is quoted out of the context that these number originates f

Re: Code covered by the Oracle grant

2011-06-08 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 08.06.2011 00:37, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: Greg Stein wrote on 06/07/2011 05:50:49 PM: Besides the content Oracle owns, it seems we could just ask the other owners to give the CWS's to the ASF. I mean, really... *somebody* out there holds the copyright. We just have to determine w

Re: Code covered by the Oracle grant

2011-06-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.06.2011 13:00, Nóirín Plunkett wrote: On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: If there was still too much concern about that, I could work on an improved list from a technical perspective and provide this list in a few days. I don't claim to reach perfection, but the r

Re: Code covered by the Oracle grant

2011-06-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.06.2011 12:37, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Mathias Bauer wrote: I don't think that this is really necessary *now*, as we can do that even better and more efficiently when we actually work on the code from the svn repository. It was promised that the needed files will be provided once the

Re: Code covered by the Oracle grant

2011-06-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.06.2011 06:01, Ralph Goers wrote: Sam, for me this is the only area where I question whether I will vote for the proposal. From what I read in Christian Lohmaier's summary Oracle has supplied about 50% of the OOo source code. His summary ended with "Apache OOo is far from being able to de