Sorry,
this was a mistake, I used a wrong mail address; ignore this posting,
please.
regards,
Mathias
On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Mathias
On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE
Sorry, I used a wrong mail address and then resent my vote with the
correct one; please ignore this mail.
Regards,
Mathias
On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Mathias
On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any
'' ||'''Email'''
||'''Affiliation''' ||'''iCLA''' ||
||Kai Ahrens ||ka at openoffice dot org ||Individual !OpenOffice.org,
[[http://graphics.openoffice.org|graphics.openoffice.org]] || ||
||Eric Bachard |
'' ||'''Email'''
||'''Affiliation''' ||'''iCLA''' ||
||Kai Ahrens ||ka at openoffice dot org ||Individual !OpenOffice.org,
[[http://graphics.openoffice.org|graphics.openoffice.org]] || ||
||Eric Bachard |
On 07.06.2011 14:22, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 07.06.2011 13:00, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mathias Bauer
wrote:
If there was still too much concern about that, I could work on an
improved
list from a technical perspective and provide this list in a few days. I
don
On 07.06.2011 17:13, Danese Cooper wrote:
It's a lot of code as well. When we launched it took a day (as in 24
hours) to build. I'd imagine that situation will have improved
somewhat
Indeed, fortunately. And before the "24 hours build" is quoted out of
the context that these number originates f
On 08.06.2011 00:37, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on 06/07/2011 05:50:49 PM:
Besides the content Oracle owns, it seems we could just ask the other
owners
to give the CWS's to the ASF. I mean, really... *somebody* out there
holds
the copyright. We just have to determine w
On 07.06.2011 13:00, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
If there was still too much concern about that, I could work on an improved
list from a technical perspective and provide this list in a few days. I
don't claim to reach perfection, but the r
On 07.06.2011 12:37, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
I don't think that this is really necessary *now*, as we can do that
even better and more efficiently when we actually work on the code
from the svn repository. It was promised that the needed files will
be provided once the
On 07.06.2011 06:01, Ralph Goers wrote:
Sam, for me this is the only area where I question whether I will
vote for the proposal. From what I read in Christian Lohmaier's
summary Oracle has supplied about 50% of the OOo source code. His
summary ended with "Apache OOo is far from being able to de
10 matches
Mail list logo