Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Incubating M3 (RC4)

on qpid-dev at 2008-08-22: >> http://markmail.org/message/2a6pmx3sdgvh5bu5 >> And closed it on 2008-08-27 http://markmail.org/message/xb3qppr5krtdp43w >> >> There were: >> 8 +1s (1 of which was binding) >> 0 0's >> 0 -1's >> >> Whi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Incubating M3 (RC3)

2008/8/29 Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Friday 29 August 2008 12:16:34 pm Martin Ritchie wrote: >> 2008/8/29 Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > The LICENSE/NOTICE files seem to use the older "auto generated from the >> > older maven plugin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Incubating M3 (RC3)

- World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid >> > "Nine-tenths of wisdom consists in being wise in time." - Theodore >> > Roosevelt >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> While those are being fixed there's one more thing as well, >> qpid-incubating-M3-java.tar.gz is missing the license text for the third >> party licenses it uses, eg BSD, MIT, MPL, EPL. The text of those licenses >> needs to be included somewhere probably in the top level LICENSE file. >> >>...ant > > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Martin Ritchie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Incubating M3 (RC3)

ge for the svn commands) >> >> - Aidan >> >> -- >> Apache Qpid - World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing >> http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid >> "Nine-tenths of wisdom consists in being wise in time." - Th

Re: FW: (qpid) Diversity

again working as a community to provide a M2.1 release that will inter operate at AMQP 0-9 with other AMQP products outside the Apache world. I for one am looking forward to our future releases where we can again move the entire project on to the wholly different AMQP 0-10. -- Martin Ritchie --

Re: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release

> > > KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All artifacts can be downloaded as a single tar file at, > > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~rajith/qpid-release/M2/Final/final.tar.gz<http://people.apache.org/%7Erajith/qpid-release/M2/Final/final.tar.gz> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Erajith/qpid-release/M2/Final/final.tar.gz> > > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Erajith/qpid-release/M2/Final/final.tar.gz> > > > > > > < > > > http://people.apache.org/%7Erajith/qpid-release/M2/Final/final.tar.gz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The release artifacts can be built using the following tag, > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/qpid/tags/M2/Final/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajith Attapattu > > > > > > > Red Hat > > > > > > > Blog http://mutlix.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Rajith Attapattu > > > > > Red Hat > > > > > Blog http://mutlix.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Rajith Attapattu > > > > Red Hat > > > > Blog http://mutlix.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Rajith Attapattu > > > Red Hat > > > Blog http://mutlix.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Paul Fremantle > > Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 > > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > > > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > > > > > -- > Rajith Attapattu > Red Hat > Blog http://mutlix.blogspot.com/ Just wanted to add my (non-IPMC so non-binding) vote as we had to rebuild the artifacts with missing license details. +1 -- Martin Ritchie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release

On 14/11/2007, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have reduced our dependency set to the following, I will update the > NOTICE file accordingly and commit the changes so Rajith can rebuild > the Java release. > Sorry let me try that again, I don't think there is

Re: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release

org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12:jar:1.4.0:compile org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.4.3:compile uk.co.thebadgerset:junit-toolkit:jar:0.6.1:compile net.sf.retrotranslator:retrotranslator-runtime:jar:1.2.1:package junit:junit:jar:3.8.1:test On 14/11/2007, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release

.gz<http://people.apache.org/%7Erajith/qpid-release/M2/Final/final.tar.gz > > > > > > > The release artifacts can be built using the following tag, > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/qpid/tags/M2/Final/ > > > > Regards, > > > > Ra

Re: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release

gs/M2/Final/ > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rajith Attapattu > > > Red Hat > > > Blog http://mutlix.blogspot.com/ > > > > ----- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

with 'The Apache Way' even though it cannot be referenced. 1. [Discuss] on [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. [Vote] on [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. [Vote] [Process Approval] on [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4. [Vote] in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards -- Martin Ritchie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Adding new committers process

Noel, It has been a while since I posted this and the conversation has gone cold. I'd like to get some consensus on what the PPMC's role is so that we can update the documentation. See embedded comments below. On 11/04/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/04/07,

Re: WANTED: Another Mentor for QPid

subscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Martin Ritchie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Adding new committers process

have chosen to handle this by offering my IPMC/mentor vote to > the three qpid votes that were summarized on this list last month. > I can also do the sending of the root requests when there are two > other +1 IPMC votes. That's fine. My comment to Martin Ritchie was entire

Re: Adding new committers process

ribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Martin Ritchie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Adding new committers process

ssion. So just to clarify, anyone on the PPMC can request the account/karma setup just the IPMC needs to be CC'd as well as the usual PPMC on the root email. Regards -- Martin Ritchie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Adding new committers process

them take care of requesting any new accounts. Should I be asking the general PMC to request the account? or is cc-ing private/[EMAIL PROTECTED] all that is needed? -- Martin Ritchie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: Board Report review comment responding

On 16/02/07, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Martin Ritchie wrote: > Hi, > > Just saw the review updates on the board reports. > > Are we supposed to respond on the wiki? or just next report time? If an IPMC member has made a comment about your project and you have a

Board Report review comment responding

Hi, Just saw the review updates on the board reports. Are we supposed to respond on the wiki? or just next report time? -- Martin Ritchie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: January 2007 Incubator Report (Revised)

r a report with some help from Carl that I present > here for your comments and suggestions. I would like to submit this > report on Friday so if you can get your comments to me by then I will > integrate them and post the results. > -- Martin Ritchie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Incubator Releases

lease plans are OK. How does "official Relase" differ to what incubated projects release just now? Is it the inclusion of the disclaimer that make them ok? Is this just old text? It sounds like no releases only snapshots. Would that mean we could only deploy maven snapshots not releases? C

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

uld be good to clear this up and update the Disclaimer section to say exactly where the specified disclaimer text should be put. Cheers -- Martin Ritchie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Including snapshot dependencies from other ASF projects

was having is what happens when you are doing everything that you can but you need to release a version of your software but cannot get one of your dependencies to release a new version. Do you wait for them to release? Cheers -- Martin Ritchie Qpid On 17/11/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTEC