+1 , glad we have come to this point.
--
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 03:18, Jim Hurley wrote:
We, therefore, are open to discussing a name change to something
else within the Jini Community.
If there's agreement on the positions stated in 1 and 2 above,
we'll assume there's general support for our Proposal to Apa
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2006 03:24, Mark Brouwer wrote:
I would be saddened if we can't maintain "Jini" as project name
I think Mark has put it rather well.
The Jini community want a water cooler to gather around.
Brilli
Mark Brouwer wrote:
I would be saddened if we can't maintain "Jini" as project name, but if
it has to become something like "Genie" would it still be possible to do
the following:
- Create various specification deliverables that are of the form "Jini
Bob Scheifler wrote:
There are definitely people in the community that want to see the
existing Jini community process maintained for approving standards.
I used to be one of them. But, when we've looked for volunteers
committed to running that process, there are very few takers.
I was one of
Jim Hurley wrote:
On Aug 15, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
I'm not convinced the goal in the past was to have multiple
implementations, vs allowing multiple implementations.
I think the interpretation of this goal underlies both the naming and
standard issues. In essence, does the J
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
I know changing the name is a *really* tough thing for Jini. However, is
Jini a *technology* or an *implementation*? If its the prior I'm afraid
our current guidelines are not to do technology names.
I understand for those not very involved with the Jini Technology i
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
I think they ended up at java.net (see [1]). Last week or so I saw
that and was wondering myself, b/c of the proposal here.
Hi,
The current distribution of the JTSK (the Jini Starter Kit) has shown up
at java.net but that had to do with the old jini.org website closi
Bob Scheifler wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I guess this means keeping jini.org around for a long time to come, and I think
this means you need a name for "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" which is not "jini" :)
Could you expand on why you think that? Thanks.
Maybe it is also good to emphasis that Jini is a t
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 19:19, Leo Simons wrote:
What I'm missing is an idea of the interaction between jini.org and this
proposed new apache project, and an idea of the interaction between the JCP
process and the apache project. Eg is the apache project a (reference?)
i
10 matches
Mail list logo
