issue.
Best,
Klesh Wong
On 6/26/2024 2:32 AM, PJ Fanning wrote:
+1 (binding)
* Downloads ok
* asc and sha512 files are ok
* file name has version and incubating in it
* LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER are ok
* source code headers are ok
* no compiled source
* tried to build but the build was too
Thanks to everyone that voted for Apache Devlake in such a short period,
with your votes, we can prepare the release for the incoming
hacktoberfest 2022 event, which would certainly help us grow.
And thanks Liang Zhang for the quick follow-up.
My gratitude to all of you.
On 22/10/09 05:39AM, Lia
Hi,
Thanks for the support, will do on next release. :)
Best Regards
Klesh Wong
On 22/08/02 01:27AM, cas...@apache.org wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I checked
> [YES] release files in correct location
> [YES] release files have the word incubating in their name
>
Hi, Felix
Thanks for your support.
Did you import the "KEYS" before the verification?
> > > > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
> > > > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/devlake/KEYS
Thanks
Klesh Wong
On 22/08/07 11:26PM, Felix C
+1 (non-binding)
I checked these items:
- Download links are valid.
- Checksums and signatures.
- LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER-WIP files exist
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers (**.go and **.js)
On 22/08/01 02:15PM, Liang Zhang wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is a call
Hi JB,
Thank you so much for the support.
I would like to learn more about the NOTICE extending, could you
describe what was missing in the NOTICE file? What should we do to
extend it. Are there any examples for reference?
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Klesh Wong
On 22/07/08 06:44AM
+1
I checked these items:
- Download links are valid.
- Checksums and signatures.
- LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER-WIP files exist
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers (**.go and **.js)
On 22/07/04 04:27PM, Liang Zhang wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is a call for vote to re
Hi, Justin.
Thank you so much for the tremendous help, we will follow your
guidance and fix the issues ASAP.
Best Regards
Klesh Wong
On 6/27/22 17:34, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Doing a comparison of the license text with the ASF one, it looks like the
issue has been fixed and the
s for reference?
Thanks for your help, it means a lot.
Best Regards,
Klesh Wong
1. https://github.com/palantir/blueprint
On 6/27/22 14:33, Justin Mclean wrote:
] that have
Apache 2.0 license.
+1
I checked these items:
- Download links are valid.
- Checksums and signatures.
- LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files exist
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers (**.go and **.js)
On 6/19/22 21:05, Liang Zhang wrote:
Hello all,
This is a call for vote to release Apache
10 matches
Mail list logo