http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html
"A Mentor is a role undertaken by a permanent member of the Apache
Software Foundation and is chosen by the Sponsor to actively lead in
the discharge of their duties (listed above)."
On 7/13/06, Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have a more specific question: have you guys considered separating
this into a plug-ins/tooling donation to Eclipse, and a runtime
donation to Apache? It seems like the IP is already in a form that
makes this easy (ie, the AJAX Toolkit Framework Eclipse plugins from
IBM, and the AjaxTK Javascrip
Thanks Dims. Did you mean:
tuscany-dev-subscribe AT ws.apache.org
tuscany-commits-subscribe AT ws.apache.org
On 12/11/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Team,
>
> I've created 2 tuscany mailing lists.
>
> * tuscany-dev
> * tuscany-commits
>
> Please subscribe by sending an
> > How about a BoF around Tuscany so all the folks who have expressed
> > interest and are present can get together for a f2f? I'll be there
> > Monday-Wednesday (no weekend tutorials for me this time) -- I've
> > proposed a timeslot/location on the wiki:
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/
Glad to see a strong show of interest from the WS PMC, look forward to
working more w/ you guys.
How about a BoF around Tuscany so all the folks who have expressed
interest and are present can get together for a f2f? I'll be there
Monday-Wednesday (no weekend tutorials for me this time) -- I've
p
On 12/5/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/5/05, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Roy T.Fielding wrote:
> > >
> > > No, the proposal is all about SOA. What you are saying is that the
> > > *actual plan* is about SCA. What I am saying is that the proposal
> > Specifically, I think the goal of providing a language/platform
> > neutral service assembly layer that's backed by an extensible set of
> > app developer models (with a shared conceptual framework) for specific
> > languages/technologies, is something distinct here. Stuff like
> > figuring ou
Hi Noel,
(I worked with Jeremy on the proposal, and this seems like a good
place to chime in)
If by "merge", you mean consolidate the projects organizationally, we
debated approaching e.g. the WS PMC with this first but decided that
it ultimately make more sense to just come to the incubator and
Incubate Tuscany SOA project
Key: INCUBATOR-8
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-8
Project: Incubator
Type: Wish
Reporter: Kenneth Tam
Placeholder for materials related to Tuscany SOA incubator proposal.
--
This
Hi Ken, one of the msg links in the incubator status look irrelevant
(leading me to suspect it's meant to be pointing somewhere else). See
inline.
On 11/2/05, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Resolved Issues
> ===
>
...
>
> o All projects under incubation must u
Incubator quarterly status report for Beehive:
Beehive did a 1.0m1 incubating milestone release on June 6/2005. With
the recent finalization of JSR-181 (Annotated Java Web Services) and
its associated TCK, the wheels are turning to get Beehive certified as
181 compliant.
The big news, we're in t
I'll follow up separately with Cliff to see whether a CLA ever
actually made it to Apache, but in any case he has been inactive since
day 1 and should be removed.
On 7/15/05, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > Dear Incubator PMC
Beehive doesn't currently have any implementations of the WS-*
standards, including WS-Security -- the intent was to at some point
look to other Apache projects that were implementing those standards
(I don't subscribe to legal-discuss, but I presume the discussion in
question is wrt WSS4J?).
On 7
13 matches
Mail list logo
