The vote to release crunch-0.5.0-incubating has passed with 3 binding +1s
and no other votes:
Patrick Hunt (binding, from crunch-dev thread)
Tom White (binding)
Doug Cutting (binding)
Let this be a lesson for anyone else who calls for a release vote on
general@ the Friday before a holiday weekend
So happy to see this project coming about! I think you have plenty of
committers already, but I am looking forward to creating a Crunch backend
that executes against Tez-- let me know if there's anything I can to do
help.
J
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Crunch 0.5.0 (incubating). This is our third release at Apache, and it
fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313526&version=12323476
The vote will be open for
I thought that the need for diversity referred to the community, not to the
mentors.
I strongly advocate for newly incubating projects choosing their own
initial members (you need only search for the epic thread that resulted
from the Crunch Proposal circa May 2012), but it seems like recent data
After 72 hours, the vote has passed with the following votes:
+1 Chris Mattmann (binding)
+1 Ashish Paliwal
+1 Doug Cutting (binding)
+1 Dave Fisher (binding)
+1 Arvind Prabhakar
5 +1s, 4 of them binding, and no 0s or -1s.
I will send an email to the Board asking them to include the resolution i
ristian Tzolov
* Gabriel Reid
* Josh Wills
* Kiyan Ahmadizadeh
* Matthias Friedrich
* Rahul Sharma
* Robert Chu
* Tom White
* Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Josh Wills be appointed to the
office of Vice President, Apache Crunch, to serve in accordance wit
Hi all,
After 72 hours, the vote for Crunch 0.3.0 RC1 passes with 4 IPMC +1 votes,
3 non-binding +1 votes, and no 0 or -1 votes.
+1 (IPMC/binding):
* Patrick Hunt (On crunch-dev mailing list)
* Doug Cutting
* Tom White
* Arun Murthy
+1 (non-binding):
* Josh Wills (On crunch-dev mailing list
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 September 2012 16:55, Josh Wills wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > A slight correction below-- Matthias is not on the Crunch PPMC, and so
> his
> > +1 vote should have been marked as non-binding. Apologies.
>
Hey everyone,
A slight correction below-- Matthias is not on the Crunch PPMC, and so his
+1 vote should have been marked as non-binding. Apologies.
Josh
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following can
Hello everyone,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Crunch 0.3.0 (incubating). This will be our first release. A vote was held
on the developer mailing list and passed with 4 +1s:
http://markmail.org/thread/yvtvog5lrj3a7gep
+1s:
phunt (IPMC)
jwills (binding)
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> infrastructure@ preferably by filing a jira ticket against INFRA
> related to either a CMS request or an svnpubsub one.
>
Got it-- thanks!
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Josh Wills
> >
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>> The "open enrollment" period has historically been controversial -- Crunch is
>> not the first project to wrestle with it.
>
> Just to re-iterate, the issue with Crunch was not whether or not that
> group decided to have an open enrollment or
+1.
>
> Josh and his cohorts have gotten a quick, unexpected introduction to
> the value of building a diverse community. But the code's solid and
> the lessons learned. Looking forward to this one.
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Steve Loughran
> wrote:
>&g
Inlined.
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> This isn't about whether or not they will respond appropriately to new
> contributors once they are incubator project. And it's absolutely not
> whether or not I should be an initial committer (the vote's going on
> already and I'm h
Hi Steve,
Thank you for your thoughtful comments. Replies inlined below.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Steve Loughran
wrote:
> On 23 May 2012 19:35, Josh Wills wrote:
>
>> Hey Jakob,
>>
>> This was a tough one-- you know that I've been talking about Crunch
>&
Hi Jukka,
Apologies for the delay, I had a vacation day. Replies inline.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CrunchProposal
>
> Some comments from th
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>> That said, the team did feel strongly about keeping the initial committers
>> to people who had already added major pieces of functionality to Crunch
>
>
* Performance, usability, and robustness improvements.
* Improving diagnostic reporting and debugging for individual !MapReduce jobs.
* Providing a centralized place for contributed extensions and
domain-specific applications.
= Current Status =
== Meritocracy ==
Crunch was initially developed by
ell. Hadoo, Giraph and Kafka committer,
> details here: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jghoman
>
> -Jakob
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>> Thank you Vinod. I wasn't sure of the right protocol for this sort of
>> thing, as my expectation was that
Hadoop MapReduce committer. Lead dev on Hadoop
> next-gen MapReduce aka YARN. Familiar with / know a bit or two about
> FlumeJava.
>
> Thanks,
> +Vinod
>
>
> On May 15, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Josh Wills wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to propose Crunch, a
towards Apache
> Hadoop MapReduce. Good to see it in the ASF.
>
> If you don't mind I'll sign up as a volunteer mentor.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> On May 15, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Josh Wills wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to propose Crunch, a libra
Nah, that was the automatic wiki linking on CapitalizedWords being a
little bit too clever. Fixed.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> The MapReduce link in the proposal doesn't resolve. You perhaps want
> to use "http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/"; instead.
>
> Don
>
> -
collection-useful-apache-pig-udfs
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> Could you compare with Pig ? Is Scala support the main difference ?
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 05/16/2012 02:23 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>>
>
Hi all,
I would like to propose Crunch, a library for writing MapReduce
pipelines in Java and Scala, as an Apache Incubator project. The
proposal is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CrunchProposal
We would gladly welcome additional volunteers to act as mentors on the
project, so if this so
Hi,
I'd like to have edit permissions for my account (JoshWills) on the
incubator proposal wiki.
Thanks!
Josh
--
Director of Data Science
Cloudera
Twitter: @josh_wills
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.ap
&dq=craig+chambers+google&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pIO0T67wD-7YiQLDmsXFAg&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAA
Of course, Google has also patented MapReduce and GFS, the basis of
the core of Apache Hadoop.
Cloudera has not filed any patents on the work done on Crunch and has
no intention of doing so.
> -Pri
Hi all,
I would like to propose Crunch, a library for writing MapReduce
pipelines in Java and Scala, as an Apache Incubator project. The
proposal is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CrunchProposal
We would gladly welcome additional volunteers to act as mentors on the
project, so if this so
27 matches
Mail list logo
