Hi Justin,
We will adjust all dates accordingly for the next release.
Regarding the CREDITS file, this came out of a discussion on the mailing
list a year ago and back then everybody seem to be happy with this solution
(and BTW there are other Apache projects which do it this way). The
conclus
Hi Julian
We had the discussion about the build instructions before. I dug up your
email from the 25th of October last year and your answer was:
"I see now that there’s a line in README.md, "Please check out the
documentation for information about how to deploy, run, test and program
against
sure that in the future when we close them there is always a PR
assigned.
Thanks,
Jonas
Rat- yes thanks I think I was looking at a older change. I double
check and
see the Pom file rat exclusion does not include docker or doc
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 12:29 AM Jonas Pfefferle
wrote:
Hi
Hi Felix
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:43:45 -0800
Felix Cheung wrote:
+1 (binding)
a few comments below, checked:
filename
signature & hash
DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE
build from src
no binary
src files have headers (see below)
comments, not blocker for release IMO:
1.
CREDITS file is a bit non-
exts of licenses, but having people open jar
files to read the licenses seems to defeat the "convenience" of
reading the ingredients. If your packaging can extract a LICENSE
from each jar you could point to those files.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 11/7/18, 8:07 AM, "Jonas Pfefferle"
S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com,
Phone: +1(919)254-7182
Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703,
United States
-"Jonas Pfefferle" wrote: -
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
From: "Jonas Pfefferle"
Date: 11/07/2018 07:35AM
Su
Since we are only shipping jars and jars already include the licenses e.g.
in META-INF or the pom file, we could refer to them in the NOTICE file
instead of replicating them.
Jonas
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 13:35:04 +0100
"Jonas Pfefferle" wrote:
Hi all,
We are just preparing a n
Hi all,
We are just preparing a new release and are wondering how and what is
required for licenses and copyrights of components shipped with an artifact.
According to the release
policy http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#distribute-other-artifacts
we need to include licenses o
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 00:25:51 +1100
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Just to clarify the need for build instructions. The documentation
is part of the repository:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/tree/master/doc and can be
generated with "make html". Is it sufficient if we point this
Hi Justin,
Just to clarify the need for build instructions. The documentation is part
of the repository: https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/tree/master/doc
and can be generated with "make html". Is it sufficient if we point this out
in the README? We don't want to duplicate documentati
Hi Justin,
I believe technically it is a), so I will leave it as is for now.
Thanks,
Jonas
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:38:05 +1100
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Correct, the copyright headers were removed. Previously the
copyright was part of the NOTICE file however we removed it after you
pointed
CEST using RSA key
ID AA557B11
gpg: Good signature from "Jonas Pfefferle ”
Odd I get:
gpg: assuming signed data in
'apache-crail-1.1-incubating-bin.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Fri 26 Oct 21:50:58 2018 AEDT
gpg:using RSA key 9C196C5FAA557B11
gpg: Good signature f
Hi all,
Thanks again for voting on Apache Crail 1.1-incubating rc3. I'm canceling
the vote due to found issues.
We will prepare a new release candidate to address the issues.
Thanks,
Jonas
On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:32:05 +0100
"Jonas Pfefferle" wrote:
Hi Luciano,
Thank
Hi Luciano,
Thanks for your vote. We will prepare another release to address the
problems with the binary release.
Jonas
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 15:42:38 -0800
Luciano Resende wrote:
If the podling decide to release only the source artifacts I would
be +1
(binding) for that as Justin and Jul
:
$ gpg --verify apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in `apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Fri 26 Oct 2018 12:50:58 PM CEST using RSA key ID
AA557B11
gpg: Good signature from "Jonas Pfefferle "
- What is contained in CREDITS is
Please vote to approve the release of Apache Crail 1.1-incubating (rc3).
The podling dev vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00453.html
The result:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00462.html
Commit to be voted upon:
https://git-wip-us.apache
Hi,
Thanks for all your votes. Here is the result:
4 + votes
0 - votes
Some comments for future votes that I'm about to address:
- Use Apache email address for signing
- Include public URL of KEYS file
- Clarify build instruction (need to build without tests)
I'm going to release the first sour
Ok, I will include the public KEYS URL in future calls for vote.
Thanks,
Jonas
On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:25:24 +0100
sebb wrote:
On 25 May 2018 at 12:10, Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
Hi Willem
You can find the KEYS file here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/crail/KEYS
Is that
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Jonas Pfefferle
wrote:
Hi,
At the moment there is no way to run the tests without setting up a
configuration for your system (Crail needs hugepage mountpoint,
network
interfaces etc).
For that reason we instruct people in the README to
pDirectory(org.apache.crail.ClientTest):
null/conf/crail-site.conf (No such file or directory)
Willem Jiang
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Jonas Pfefferle
wrote:
Plea
Forgot to add:
Release artifacts have been signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pepperjo.asc
Thanks,
Jonas
On Tue, 22 May 2018 09:28:01 +0200
"Jonas Pfefferle" wrote:
Please vote to approve the source release of Apache Crail
1.0-incubating (
Please vote to approve the source release of Apache Crail 1.0-incubating
(RC3).
This release candidate fixes all issues raised in the last IPMC vote:
- Add DISCLAIMER
- Move IBM copyright from NOTICE file to CREDITS file and fix formatting of
Apache copyright
- Leading directory name in tar/zip
Hi @All,
Thanks for your votes. Sorry for the late response, I was traveling the last
4 days.
I'm canceling the vote.
I will create a new release candidate addressing the following issues:
- DISCLAIMER
- NOTICE
- Leading directory name in tar/zip file:
I vote for what Julian suggested
A leadin
Please vote to approve the source release of Apache Crail 1.0-incubating
(RC2).
The podling dev vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00241.html
The result:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00249.html
Commit hash: 749f44206943fcaef0841ed89411013c
24 matches
Mail list logo
