+1 (Binding)
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The FreeMarker community has discussed [1] and voted [2] positively on
> graduating to a top level project (TLP). The resolution for the graduation
> has been proposed and discussed in this list [3].
> Informat
2018-02-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
> I am currently finishing some magazine articles about Apache PLC4X and Apache
> Edgent and therefore sent Sally my documents fort he official „ok“ … I should
> add the incubation disclaimer to my articles. As these are German articles, I
> didn’t w
+1 for retirement (binding)
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Danese Cooper wrote:
> +1 to retire (binding)
>
> Danese
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>>
>> The podling has positively voted to r
If it's not too late: Here's my +1.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:12 PM, James Bognar
wrote:
> Reminder that the deadline for this vote has passed and we still need 1
> more binding vote.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:33 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> Bringing over my +1
>>
>> On Mon,
-1
Because I fail to see a problem with the current policy.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:22 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm calling to vote on a proposed policy change. Current guide at [1]
> indicates that maven artifacts should include incubator (or incubating) in
> the version string of
+1 (Binding)
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> [Note: this is the IPMC vote on general@incubator - there's a
> concurrent VOTE thread on dev@commons]
>
> Since Commons RDF entered incubation, it has evolved the understanding
> of its purpose, developed and released co
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> How can the project name be a problem when "weex" sounds to me like the
> very common English word *weeks*?
Depends on the language. In german, it's close to a slang word for
"masturbation", Not sufficiently close, IMO, to cause problems, but
I am +1 (Binding)
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on
> accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator
> [ ] +0 Abstain.
> [ ] -1 Do not accept RocketMQ
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> So by default a HipChat conversation would be equivalent to using private@
> except when somebody manually activates recording which produces a wiki
> page with no email notification whatsoever?
That is how I understand it. However, this sound
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> Would hipchat be logged somewhere?
>
> Is it possible to be at least some weekly digest email?
That might be possible. See INFRA-12328.
Jochen
--
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-
*Big* +1. Lets hope, that Sisu follows (sooner, or later). It feels
*so* unnatural, to have this stuff at Eclipse.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven
> Artifact Resolver to fix a trademark issue:
>
>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
>> Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days
Could someone please enlighten me, what "this" is about?
Thanks,
Jochen
--
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk
+1 (Binding)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended,
> please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The ASF voting rules are described at:
>http://www.apache.org/foundation/vo
In all honesty: What would I as a mentor do, to get the project
rolling? Obvious: Ask the mailing list for an "Initial committer
list". So, what's the point?
Jochen
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> The NetBeans proposal (among many others in the past) has demonstrated a
> si
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> There are also the [3rd party binaries used during NetBeans build](http://
> hg.netbeans.org/binaries/) - most of them available from Maven central. I
> already [created a patch](http://hg.netbeans.org/releases/rev/3178d0a561c8) to
> allow
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Still, the question remain -- for somebody like that, what would be a criteria
> to be added as a committer after the project enters incubation?
Projects decision.
--
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"
http://www.ke
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Finally, Infra does also provide access to a code signing service you
> can use to sign you apps if that is useful. Probably only if you want to
> distribute apps outside of Google play.
More infos on that, please.
Jochen
--
The next tim
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> I also realized that he'll be the only US-based mentors, so he can
> take all the press requests from there ;-)
I am unaware, that taking press requests is part of mentor duties. One
reason to hesitate in the future.
Jochen
--
The
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> In the Taverna Incubator project we have been developing an Android mobile
> app which is almost ready for a first release. Are there any ASF procedures
> and policies for doing an Android release? Can an ASF based Android app be
> released in
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> This vote makes me cranky. Everyone is focused on making it easier for
> podlings. Is the goal of incubation to pass a graduation vote or to learn?
True, but I don't think that life should be more difficult for incoming podlings
than fo
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> Perhaps it would make sense for $podling.apache.org to
> issue a 302 redirect to the incubator? Then it's there
> for people and search engines, but the potential for
> being accidentally misleading is much reduced.
We are not only talking abou
+1 to implementing this in the future.
-0 for retroactive implementation.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> +1
>
>> On 28 Jun 2016, at 15:28, John D. Ament wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to
>> the infra tea
+1 (Binding)
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:47 PM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
> to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating.
>
> PPMC Vote Call:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201606.mbox/%3c761262
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, James Bognar
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a
> vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator.
>
> For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be found at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.htm
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:27 PM, James Bognar
wrote:
> @Stian,
>
> I've removed references to "Apache" from the temp site and removing all
> links to the GitHub repo. The only thing I can't change is the google site
> URL https://sites.google.com/site/apachejuneau/. Hopefully this is okay
> unti
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> We generally expect some kind of backing community to bring this to. We
> have seen pretty consistently that starting from an empty community doesn't
> work. It doesn't mean that it's impossible, but very hard to do.
Understood. On the o
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:25 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> We (the Commons PMC) have not decided yet what to do, but I just wanted to
> gauge the interest in joining the math IPMC if we choose to go TLP by way
> of the incubator. The idea would be that math (whatever its name may be),
> would go thro
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Looking back through the discussion, it is a bit of a problem that one of
> the major reasons given for the fork is that the team thought that they
> didn't have a large enough PMC and that incubation wouldn't get them enough
> additional contr
I worked as a mentor before in projects like VXQuery, or AsterixDB.
I'd be ready to do the same for Juneau. However, AFAIK, I don't
qualify nowadays. (In the past, it was sufficient to be a member, this
has to be changed to be an Incubator PMC member.)
Jochen
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:38 AM, John
Hi,
in a thread with the subject "[VOTE] Add Chris Hillery as a committer
and PPMC member" the AsterixDB project has unanimously decided to
invite Chris Hillery to become a committer. (Sorry, no quote, because
the vote was happening on private@) Chris has already supplied a CLA.(
he is listed on [
+1 (Binding)
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please verify and vote on the first full Apache AsterixDB release!
> This candidate addresses some of the differences that were noticed
> between the tagged commit in git and the source packaging.
>
> The tag to be
Forwarding to general@incubator, where it is obviously on-topic.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
Date: Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:30 PM
Subject: Welcome Heath Alexander Mattmann!
To: "memb...@apache.org"
Hi Everyone,
Heath Alexander Mattmann (HAM) was born J
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
> I guess there's some legal issue I'm ignorant of here then. How would
> one submit a patch, without cloning from the official mirror, and
> hence becoming just as aware of ASF involvement as they would
> otherwise?
The legal issue at hand is t
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
> Then what are they submitting a patch for review to, exactly?
That is the question, indeed. And, please, keep in mind that the
answer must satisfy not a humble developer with "no red tape" in mind,
but a lawyer.
>> Second, Gerrit is where ev
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Chris Hillery wrote:
> I feel sure that
> with an ASF-hosted Gerrit, we wouldn't be able to install any hooks or
> plugins, or manage permissions, or anything like that in the way that we
> find useful.
Not initially, to be sure. But in the medium term, and with
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:56 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> We've explored gerrit 2-3 times in the past 24 months. We have seen
> several projects request it over the years. As I've mentioned
> elsewhere in this thread, our most recent exploration was in December,
> and there are a number of issues th
Hi,
I am writing as one of the Mentors of the AsterixDB podling.
It recently came to my attention, that there are, in fact, multiple
Git repositories, which are used by the project, one of them being
located externally of the ASF. I understand the structure to be like
this:
+--+ C
Hello, Jochen,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jochen Theodorou
> community equals committers?
No. The community is more than the team of committers. I'm sure you
understand. OTOH, the set of committers can be considered a
representation of the community.
I am quite certain, most Incubator me
Hi, Chris,
I am interested in the proposal and (following up to my involvement
with VXQuery in the past) would like to offer myself as a mentor.
Jochen
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am pleased to bring forth the Apache AsterixDB proposal to
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> What kind of Mentor activity do you think VXQuery would benefit from?
I don't think, there are any pressing issues. Basically, as I know from my
own experience, you can feel kinda lost, if mentors aren't actively
participating in every d
Hi,
I am no longer able to sign this off, as the Wiki page is already closed
for edits. So, for the record: Till's report is just fine, in particular
his remark on the less-than-active mentors. (Sorry for that.)
Jochen
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Till wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the July 2013 report
Hi,
we need three votes by PMC members on the release of
vxquery-0.2-incubating. See
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201302.mbox/%3c49a2d7eb-6514-4ffe-b583-2be1a53a5...@westmann.org%3E
Thanks,
Jochen
--
"That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to
Thanks. Anything current I should take a look at?
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Vinayak Borkar wrote:
> The VXQuery PPMC just concluded a vote to add Jochen Wiedmann as a mentor
> for the VXQuery project. The vote passed with the whole PPMC in favor of the
> addition.
>
> Whe
Start with a question on general@incubator?
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Vinayak Borkar wrote:
> Great! What is the process to officially make you a mentor?
>
> Thanks,
> Vinayak
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/16/12 2:27 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>
>> On S
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
> if you could find time to do that, it would be great if you would come on
> board as a full-fledged mentor!
That's always been my desire, and still is.
--
In other words: what could be seen as a socially debilitating failure
of characte
I'm not active in any way, but at least watching and open for
requests. Additionally, I recently became ASF member, so should now be
formally eligible as a mentor.
Jochen
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
> I wanted to echo the recent thread regarding the need for add
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (Non-binding)
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
will do the
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> There are still people signing up as initial committers.
>
> Is it a sign to wait a bit longer with the vote?
There's no problem with them joining later, is it?
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
No definitive indicator for the latter, but if it consumes parts of
the other, then it must be the former ...
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
will do th
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> [...] their downstream code cannot be used. Hence, the best outcome
> under the current licensing regime is for all core development to be
> done here, and for TDF to be a downstr
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> The words "not surprisingly" were not necessary. Labeling these words
> as an "insult", while arguably technically accurate, increased rather
> than reduced tension.
Guys, aren't you married? This "not surprisingly" simply indicates
you're male
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> The only thing I really don't have read anything about is, if we can
> handle this project from infra-resourcing.
Joe Schaefer added himself as a mentor, so we can consider that covered.
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that t
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> For the record; I am opposing this contribution and will vote -1,
> unless there is a clear indication that TDF/LO is behind it 100% and
> the two projects are on a trajectory of a merge.
Niclas, several people from TDF/LO, including Flori
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> To the extent that OOo presents the incubator with something the ASF has
> not faced, you are correct... these things we have no standards yet to
> measure whether a podling should be accepted. To the extent that it is
> the same, or s
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> IMO the only negative thing then about LibreOffice is the copyleft
> license - everything else about them is great. When deciding whether
> to accept OO we should consider whether that and facilitating BigCos
> interests is worth splitting
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:44 PM, wrote:
> I am puzzled by the view one open source project should not compete
> against another.
And I am puzzled how you don't accept that open source *allows*
forking and all that stuff, but that doesn't mean that competition is
necessarily good, or just felt as
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> This, by the way, is the source of some of the irritation from TDF, who went
> to a fair bit
> of trouble to accommodate IBM but have been represented otherwise on Rob's
> blog and elsewhere.
And rightfully so, if your understanding is righ
Excuse me for interrupting ...
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:01 AM, wrote:
> LibreOffice uses a dual license LGPLv3/MPL.
I've been reading MPL a few times in this discussion. But neither
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/license/
nor
http://www.openoffice.org/license.html
are mention
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:10 AM, wrote:
> Jochen Wiedmann wrote on 06/01/2011 02:56:10
> PM:
>
>>
>> > We could have put a much longer list of IBM names on this list,
> developers
>> > familiar with the code base via their work on Lotus Symphony (which is
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM, wrote:
> We could have put a much longer list of IBM names on this list, developers
> familiar with the code base via their work on Lotus Symphony (which is our
> OpenOffice based project). But then we could have been criticized for the
> proposal being too domin
I view this proposal very critical. IMO, OpenOffice@Apache would be a dead end:
- There is an existing community over at LibreOffice. So what good
does it, to build a second community here?
- The afore mentioned community was built exactly, because the
initiators of the current proposal have been
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1 for a rename. Using an established project name might create problems with
> the trademark. Best you ping trademarks@a.o about it.
I think, there is a misunderstandment. This is *the* OGNL project, we
are talking about and not a followu
I'm not qualified as a mentor, but I'm in for #3, which should help to
get a sufficient number.
Jochen
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Jérôme Verstrynge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The JXTA community has overwhelmingly voted in favor of migrating to ASF. I
> understand that we first need to 'recruit' a c
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I do branches all the time in Subversion, and don't see problems. We
> periodically update the branch from trunk, and when the work is done,
> merge the branch back onto trunk. These are straight-forward
> operations, so I don't understand wher
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:02, Sanjiva Weerawarana
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>>> > When I saw this month's board report for Subversion, I was taken aback
>>> > that the board is expected to follow t
BSD license as in "with advertising clause" or as in "new BSD license
without advertising clause? IANAL, but my impression is that the reply
depends on that.
Jochen
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Over on the Clerezza project I've been asked some advice about a legal
> si
Ross, while I understand the "All it does" part I don't get the
"dangerous" part.
I think noone has ever announced RAT as a solution. It is a helper
tool. I think the recommendation to use RAT (for what it offers) is
just plainly right. Nothing more - nothing less.
Jochen
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 a
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Maybe I need to catch up with the current status: is RAT still mainly targeted
> to ASF projects, or is it a general Release Audit Tool and as such also useful
> for releasing GPLed or BSL style projects?
Unfortunately, there is no clear re
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required of
> all the Incubator projects, but pretty widely integrated (at least in Java
> land) outside of the Incubator as a tool to help check ASF policies. To me,
Forgot one possible issue: Currently, RAT has its own mailing lists,
which would be unusual for Commons. My personal choice would be to
leave this as it is, but that's of course also subject to discussion.
Jochen
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
&g
Hi,
having just published a release of Apache RAT with the "-incubating"
label, I'd though it is time to discuss the future of RAT. RAT is an
incubator project since 18 months. It is not an overly busy project:
The occasional feature request, which is handled, a bug report from
time to time, and s
Hi,
on behalf of the Apache RAT team, I'd like to announce the
availability of Apache RAT 0.7. This is a feature release with several
bug fixes and minor improvements over its predecessor, Apache RAT 0.6.
An upgrade is recommended. For details on Apache RAT, see
http://incubator.apache.org/rat
Passed with 5* +1 (Kevan Miller, Senaka Fernando, Ant Elder, Stefan
Bodewig, Gavin McDonald), and no =0, or -1 votes. I'll proceed with
publishing the files.
Jochen
--
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
-
To uns
It is
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-rat-dev/201008.mbox/%3caanlkti=mzd4dm+o=fsyyxncs8mk8f5c-e6vand_es...@mail.gmail.com%3e
for the initial vote request and
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-rat-dev/201008.mbox/%3c87wrsa50ny@v35516.1blu.de%3e
htt
Hi,
the RAT developer team would like your approvement for a release of
Apache RAT 0.7.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-051/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
The proposed site and the KEYS file are here:
ht
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Finally, they have a large number of users and thus changing their java
> package names to org.apache.* will create considerable problems for them.
> They are happy with the package names but want to do it in a managed way
> with plenty of w
I am interested in the project and would offer to act as a mentor.
One question though: Could you explain, how this project compares to
VXQuery (http://incubator.apache.org/vxquery/)
Thanks,
Jochen
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Eric Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm here proposing gXML as a new
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-057/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
The proposed site is here:
http://people.apache.org/~jochen/rat/site/
The list
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:59 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Subversion client and server that doesn't use a DAV layer at all. The
> Subversion community has never released binaries -- ever -- not do we plan
> to.
That would a completely new philosophy for an Apache project, which always aimed
v
If it helps, I'd also be interested in taking a mentors work. I am no
ASF member. However I am and have been in the PMC of Commons and WS
for some years. Apart from that; I'd have a professional interest in
the project, because it is more than likely that I could use it soon.
Jochen
On Thu, Jun
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> I assuming you are protesting against the "more than 1 Mentor"
> attitude that I and others have...
Not as such. I am simply suggesting that we should change the policy
explicitly, so that it does match reality.
Jochen
--
Don't trust a g
Honestly, Niclas,
but if you and possibly others that strict, then we should change the
official policy. I do not doubt the reasons you give, but such a
statement seems difficult to me, if the official policy clearly
demands it, but insisting on more than the policy requests seems
questionable to
Hi, Craig,
I'm personally not sure that commons would be the best fit for
Sanselan. Despite the name, I'd consider the commons of xmlgraphics
(despite the name, this is not only about XML) a better place.
Nevertheless, I'd vote in favour of Sanselan, if it comes to that.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>
>> Commons is working *now*. Just as Jakarta was working once. But
>> Commons will most likely no longer work when it is growing too much.
>> And the th
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> There seems to be some concern in Commons that committers are a threat
> to the existing codebase.
I know the concerns you mention and felt them very much in the
discussion about JSch. But, at least for me personally, I don't think
that's
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Some projects are just too small to warrant the target of a TLP
>> or even a sub project
>
> We agree! We have several projects here that I believe belong in Commons!
May be. But please consider the following:
- Commons won't be able
The Apache RAT team is proud to announce the availability of Apache RAT 0.6.
RAT (Release Audit Tool) is a tool, which is designed to verify the
compliance with legal policies. A typical use case would be the
presence of license headers in ASF projects.
RAT was initially developed as a Google pro
Passed with three binding +1 (Robert, Stefan, Kevan) , and two
non-binding (Sebb and myself). No other votes have been issued. I'll
publish the release and post a formal announcement.
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true beca
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> A list of people on the Incubator PMC is here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html
Ok, thanks for the hint. That settles it:
- We have three binding +1 votes: Robert, Stefan, Kevan
- We also have two non-binding +1 votes: Sebb's and m
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Ok, that brings up the question whether these three votes are sufficient.
>>
>
> I can add +1, with the proviso that the (C) year must be corrected for
> the next release.
>
> I don't know if my +1 counts though.
Thanks, the change for the year was
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
>>> where are we with this?
>>>
>>> are we cutting another
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> where are we with this?
>
> are we cutting another release candidate or shall i take a look this one?
The only problem pointed out so far was the invalid year in the copyright. See
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--VOTE--apache-rat-pr
Hi,
I have prepared a new staging repository, which you can find on
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-51670640d59ff2/
The proposed binary and source files are in the subdirectory
org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.6/
The SVN tag is at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/as
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Alexander Veit wrote:
>> Sounds like RMI is probably not the best comparison point. How does
>> Jaffre differ from XML-RPC? Are there potential synergies with
>> projects like http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/?
>
> I'm not familiar with XML-RPC. The Jaffre wire format
Hi, Kevan,
first of all, thanks for your observations.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> An pointer to the svn location for your proposed release would be helpful. I
> choose
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/tags/apache-rat-project-0.6/ for
> the follow
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> RAT was eating it's own tail so i had to turn that off :-)
Yes, I know, I also tried to enable it without success. :-) We should
be enable to use it with a fixed, but released version once 0.6 is
out.
Jochen
--
I have always wi
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> I have prepared a staging repository for 0.6, which you can view on
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-4fdaf205188c41/
>
> i'd like to download everything so i can run rat in recursive mode
>
> is there an easy
Hi,
I have prepared a staging repository for 0.6, which you can view on
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-4fdaf205188c41/
Compared to Roberts previous rc1, I have mainly changed documentation
and license issues (seems we never used RAT to check the RAT sources
... ;-)
P
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, the Maven repository situation has little to do with the need for
> an Incubator.
Obviously you choose to pick out everying Ron's writing about the
flaws in Maven / the Maven repository while at the same time ca
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aye, and this is also the reason why it potentially conflicts with
> the meritocratic model of the ASF; furthermore there are also legal
> hurdles to cross etc.
>
> In the end I think it's simply too early to discuss all
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
