Thanks, but Aries graduated in December. I've just now removed Aries
from the report and the Incubator reporting schedule.
Thanks,
Jeremy
On 1 March 2011 14:00, wrote:
> Dear Aries Developers,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
> PMC.
> It is an in
to board@ for inclusion on the 15th December
board meeting.
Thanks for your vote and support.
Regards,
Jeremy
On 22 November 2010 11:51, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are
> ready
ov 22, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> Please VOTE on the below resolution for promoting Aries to an Apache
>> TLP and graduating from the Incubator. The VOTE is open for 72 hours.
>
> +1, but could you remove me from the PMC and committers list?
>
> I was initia
* Eoghan Glynn
* Graham Charters
* Guillaume Nodet
* Hiram R. Chirino
* Holly Cummins
* Ian Robinson
* J. Daniel Kulp
* James Strachan
* Jarek Gawor
* Jean Sebastien Delfino
*
Hi,
The Apache Aries community is pleased to announce the Apache Aries
0.1-incubating release. This is the first release of Apache Aries.
The Aries project delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling
an enterprise OSGi application programming model. This includes
implementations and exte
, Mark Nuttall,
Valentin Mahrwald, Alasdair Nottingham, David Jencks, Graham Charters,
Timothy Ward, Jeremy Hughes
+1 (non-binding): Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Thanks to everyone who helped create this release. I will promote the
artifacts to the central repo.
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 11 May 2010 12:46, ant
On 11 May 2010 07:19, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> The Aries community has voted on its first release. From the Aries home page:
>>
>> "The Aries project is delivering a set of pluggable Java components
>> enablin
de signing key for myself, Jeremy Hughes, the release
manager for this release.
We already have 4 binding +1 IPMC votes on the aries-dev list, and I'm
opening up this thread for 72 hours for any further feedback on the
staged artifacts for release.
Adam, I'm sorry there was some confusion there. I hope to see you over
on aries-...@incubator.
Cheers,
Jeremy
2009/9/29 Kevan Miller :
>
> On Sep 29, 2009, at 2:19 PM, adam wojtuniak wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I was removed from initial committers list of Apache Aries project.
>> Can someone explain me
Hi,
Results of the vote: 13 binding +1 votes, 2 binding -1 votes, 8
non-binding +1 votes.
Davanum Srinivas(*)+1
Craig L Russell(*) +1
Ant Elder(*) +1
Daniel Kulp+1
Matthias Wessendorf+1
Kevan Miller(*)+1
James Strachan(*)
+1
Welcome Adam
Cheers,
Jeremy
2009/9/22 Alan D. Cabrera :
> Rock on. Add yourself to the wiki proposal.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:11 PM, adam wojtuniak wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I would like to be involved in Apache Aries project.
>> Currently Iam working on OSGI based platfor
Hi Niclas,
2009/9/19 Niclas Hedhman :
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> The real goal as it has
>> been said an OSGi Enterprise Programming Model, and the comparison
>> that has been made with Geronimo is not bad.
>
> U... No.
>
> "The aim of the project is to produ
2009/9/16 Jim Jagielski :
>
> On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
...
>> IMO this is more a graduation issue, rather than something that should
>> prevent entry to the incubator - since thats when destination is
>> decided. There are many possible outcomes from that - perhaps some
>
M, ASF member)
* Jean-Sebastien Delfino (IBM, ASF committer)
* Jeremy Hughes (IBM, ASF committer)
* Joe Bohn (IBM, ASF committer)
* Lin Sun (IBM, ASF committer)
* Kiril Mitov (SAP)
* Mark Nuttall (IBM)
* Niklas Gustavsson (individual, ASF committer)
* Nikolai Tankov
experts with participation in
> various standards organisations ( OSGi EEG, JCP, OSOA, OASIS)
>
> Best Regards
> Peter
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> As discussion is settling down, I'd like to aim for Tuesday next week
>> (15 S
Hi Raymond, welcome! I added you to the proposal.
Thanks,
Jeremy
2009/9/11 Raymond Feng :
> I'm also interested in the Aries project and would like to sign up as an
> initial committer, especially in the area of distributed OSGi. I have been
> the key contributor in Apache Tuscany project to enab
As discussion is settling down, I'd like to aim for Tuesday next week
(15 Sept) to call a vote.
Peter, does that give you time to supply your initial set of committers?
Thanks,
Jeremy
2009/9/10 Jeremy Hughes :
> 2009/9/10 Peter Peshev :
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>> Thanks , we
he glue code between the resource
> creation in the JMS broker and the deployment.
>
> Best regards
> Peter
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> 2009/9/8 Peter Peshev :
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>
>>> Since you are asking about po
2009/9/10 Peter Peshev :
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Thanks , we would need a few more days to finalize all the
> participants from our side, some people are on vacation this week .
> Maybe it could be even a bigger number.
Wow, sounds like you have a lot to contribute :-)
> Is there a deadline ?
No, ther
Sure, please go ahead and add yourselves to the proposal wiki page.
Jeremy
2009/9/10 Roman Roelofsen :
>
> Hi,
>
> ProSyst would like to support the Aries project. 2 people could join the
> Aries development, Todor Boev (t.b...@prosyst.bg) and myself, Roman
> Roelofsen (r.roelof...@prosyst.com).
w-it-works.html
http://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
Jeremy
>
> Best Regards
> Peter Peshev
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> Cros
2009/9/8 Peter Peshev :
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Since you are asking about potential committers - at least to me a new
> OSGi project focused on Java EE sounds quite interesting.
>
> Btw, when looking at the proposal I would personally suggest even to
> expand the scope and include other Java enterprise
2009/9/9 Niklas Gustavsson :
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> Cool! So, IMO would be best to post the names here on general@ and let
>> Jeremy update the Wiki.
>
> Since we're at it, I'd like to sign up as a committer as well (apache
> username ngn). Will be quite time const
2009/9/10 Niclas Hedhman :
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> 2009/9/1 Niclas Hedhman :
>> ...
>>> +1 for Incubation, btw. I might sign up as Mentor, if I can squeeze in the
>>> time...
>> Can I persuade you to sign up :-) ... we
2009/9/2 Leo Simons :
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> We appreciate any feedback and comments on the proposal.
...
>
> * Projects that consist of groups of components often have some
> problems maintaining sufficient cohesion as a community. I hope yo
t 22:20 ,
> Marcel Offermans wrote:
>
>> On Sep 1, 2009, at 16:38 , Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> Relationships with Other Apache Projects
>>
>> I know ACE is only in incubation, but is there a reason for not mentioning
>> it in this list? To me it makes
2009/9/1 Niclas Hedhman :
...
> +1 for Incubation, btw. I might sign up as Mentor, if I can squeeze in the
> time...
Can I persuade you to sign up :-) ... we have two experienced ASF
members as mentors, but I think the additional perspective outside the
two companies putting the proposal forward wo
Cross-pollination and help from the Felix community have been talked
about several times and I absolutely welcome that. As such, please
would Felix committers willing to spend time helping the (proposed)
Aries podling add their names to the initial committer list on the
proposal wiki [1]. This natu
A goal of Aries is to seed a new community focused on the development
of an Enterprise Java OSGi application programming model, and runtime
that is agnostic of server runtime or OSGi framework implementation.
This independence from underlying technology will make Aries' appeal
as broad as possible
Progress, ASF member)
* Ian Robinson (IBM)
* James Strachan (Progress, ASF member)
* Jarek Gawor (IBM, ASF member)
* Jeremy Hughes (IBM, ASF committer)
* Joe Bohn (IBM, ASF committer)
* Lin Sun (IBM, ASF committer)
* Mark Nuttall (IBM)
* Oisin Hurley (Progress)
* Rick McGuire
Great! Thanks, Paul for running the vote.
Jeremy
On 08/12/2007, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The vote has been running for 72 hours and therefore I call this vote:
>
> 8 +1s, no 0s, no -1s.
>
> +1s from:
>
> Paul Fremantle
> Yoav Shapira
> Kevan Miller
> Matthieu Riou
> Niclas Hedm
On 26/02/07, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And it goes for a couple of others as well; Woden, TSIK & Synapse.
IMHO, the WS site should list Tuscany & Woden as sponsored podlings
and not subprojects.
I was too slow, incubation notice now on the
On 25/02/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:34, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> The vote below was held in the Tuscany podling to release two
> artifacts that are used by other modules during the build process;
> they are a podling-wide parent pom and configuration
On 15/02/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just one note:
I don't see gpg asc signatures for any of the files on that page. I also
don't see a KEYS file in svn that would list the gpg keys that would be used.
I agree we need to do this.
I looked at the policy document [1] and oddl
On 12/6/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, its that time of the month again, so this should not come as a surprise
to anyone. Reports are due on or by Friday, December
Is that Dec 8th?
Henri's
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/incubator-info.txt
In Wod
Apologies, wrong list.
On 11/30/06, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI all budding Woden release managers ... a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
may be unnecessary ...
On 11/29/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECT
FYI all budding Woden release managers ... a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
may be unnecessary ...
On 11/29/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1
> IPMC bi
ease remove it from m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository as well.
thanks,
dims
On 11/22/06, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unknown to the woden-dev team (until today) our M6 release artifacts
> have escaped to ibiblio (see this thread on woden-dev):
>
> http://mail-archives.apa
Unknown to the woden-dev team (until today) our M6 release artifacts
have escaped to ibiblio (see this thread on woden-dev):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200611.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
via them being erroneously being put into here:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibib
The incubator info file [1] has a list of the ppmc / private mailing
lists. Except we don't have a ppmc list for the Woden podling and when
I tried out the woden-private list qmail told me:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
Should each podling have a ppmc list? I
e been subscribed.
the incubation, the releases, and the user lists - and the general feeling
toward projects that are in the incubator.
here are a few snippets that cast a lot of doubt on where things actually
stand:
> Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Then, in its README Axis2 should make very clear wh
Hi,
Axis2 are starting to get ready for a 1.1 release. Since 1.0, it has a
new dependency on the Woden incubator podling. This is a similar issue
to Geronimo including ActiveMQ back in March [1]. Except, unlike
ActiveMQ, Woden was never a project existing outside the ASF.
Does anyone know of any
Sorry ... the question is ... are we doing this right? Or should every
podling actually have a PPMC.
Thanks,
Jeremy
On 2/11/06, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firstly, thank you for clarifying the process. With the last milestone
> release of the Woden podling we strug
Firstly, thank you for clarifying the process. With the last milestone
release of the Woden podling we struggled. Just a quick question ...
you seem to imply that every podling has a PPMC. In Woden we do not as
we don't envisage ever becoming a TLP. So our binding votes are the
committers' votes.
I'm a committer on WS project but can't access that file. Is it just
accessible by board members, not all committers?
Jeremy
On 1/27/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since that is a private repository, how is a public link going to benefit
> anyone who isn't a Committer?
45 matches
Mail list logo
