That particular Rhino jar is the same one we've been using since the
start, so I assume it is the old MPL one.
James Margaris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Martin Cooper
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:58 PM
To: ge
is active development and if someone
ever posted to the lists I'm sure someone would respond. Right now posting on
the lists feels like playing to an empty theater.
James Margaris
From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/14/
them as well.
I see new checkins of the NOTICE file so I assume a new vote will be
happening shortly.
James Margaris
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 5:45 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: xap-dev
ressing and how it addesses it?
It is very difficult for me to see what the goal here is and if that
goal is being achieved.
James Margaris
-Original Message-
From: Upayavira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 2:35 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [V
nication out of the project. I would expect
explanations from multiple committers, promises to do better, pleas for
clarification or something of the sort. Maybe I've missed it but the Heraldry
community seems pretty silent.
James Margaris
From:
ke committer status for people not actively doing
anything.
James Margaris
-Original Message-
From: Newcomer, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 3:25 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Policy on Initial Committership
O
edge, use it or lose it. Just my two
cents as a lurker/observer.
James Margaris
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 1:50 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Policy on Initial Committership
I was against that project