ty build goal. The team had a lot of feedback and interest from
> > > different parties, including some Apache projects.
> > > When I prepared the proposal with the team (that included people
> > > listed in the PPMC), we wanted to involve anyone helping the project
> >
catalog standard can be updated to accommodate
that. There could also be potential collaborations between Polaris and
Gravitino to achieve the goal together, and I am personally pretty excited
about that opportunity.
Best,
Jack Ye
[1] https://amoro.apache.org/docs/latest/spark-configuration/
[
> I personally prefer MPMC, MIPMC, and MPPMC. Because we want people to
think of member first when writing the acronym.
+1!
-Jack
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 10:38 AM tison wrote:
> > I personally prefer MPMC, MIPMC, and MPPMC. Because we want people to
> think of member first when writing the acro
resolving
conflicts between United States federal laws and state laws. This looks
like the direction that Carl is advocating for (correct me if I am wrong),
which I think makes sense in general.
Best,
Jack Ye
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024, 4:47 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By the point of
ople are
trying to convey. In many cases, it might appear as condescending to
correct the usage of this term in the middle of a conversation, and you
know people are not intentionally misusing it.
Best,
Jack Ye
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024, 8:13 PM tison wrote:
> ... and yes. For non-native speakers,
