The vote for releasing Apache AsterixDB (0.8.8-incubating) and Hyracks
(0.2.17-incubating) (RC1) passes, with
5 binding +1s,
0 non-binding +1s, and
0 -1 or +/-0 votes.
Binding +1s:
- Till Westmann
- Ate Douma
- Chris Mattmann
- Henry Saputra
- Justin Mclean
I've gone ahead and tried to capture t
/mod_mbox/incubator-asterixdb-dev/201602.mbox/%3C1455157707.8607.32.camel%40uci.edu%3E
with result:
Binding +1s:
Till Westmann
Ate Douma
Chris Mattmann
Mike Carey
Heri Ramampiaro
Ian Maxon
Abdullah Alamoudi
Henry Saputra
Yingyi Bu
Jianfeng Jia
Murtadha Hubail
Non-binding +1s:
Michael Blow
and no 0
The Apache AsterixDB (incubating) Team is happy to announce the first
release of Apache AsterixDB 0.8.7-incubating and its associated
Hyracks release.
Apache AsterixDB is a Big Data Management System (BDMS) that can
store, index, manage, and query semi-structured data at scale on a
cluster. (Hyrac
binaries, coming
presently...)
-Ian
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please verify and vote on the first release of Apache AsterixDB . This is our
> first incubating release for this part of the codebase, so as was the case
> with our
Hi everyone,
Please verify and vote on the first release of Apache AsterixDB . This is
our first incubating release for this part of the codebase, so as was the
case with our Hyracks components, feedback is much appreciated. As was
noted in the result and discussion on dev@asterixdb.i.a.o, this wi
rote:
> On 2015-09-22 20:11, Ian Maxon wrote:
>>
>> First let me just preface by saying this is just how I understand
>> it... If I am wrong anyone please feel free to chime in.
>> There are indeed two votes, one is the vote on dev@asterixdb.a.i.o
>> where the folks
"Chen Li" wrote:
>
>> Ian,
>>
>> I already did my "+1". Do I have to say "Binding" in order to include
>> it? Still not quite clear about the protocol.
>>
>> Chen
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Ian Maxon wr
nn (IPMC)
>> Yingyi Bu
>> Abdullah Alamoudi
>> Ate Douma (IPMC)
>> Mike Carey
>> Chris A. Mattmann (IPMC)
>> Ian Maxon
>>
>> Non-binding +1s:
>> Heri Ramampiaro
>>
>> And no 0 or -1 votes
>>
>>
>> The tag to be voted on
-asterixdb-dev/201509.mbox/%3ccan_yf5xzo8qv_yk-p41m+tppv_y2dynehc_keujwxpem_1l...@mail.gmail.com%3E
with result
Binding +1s:
Murtadha Hubail
Till Westmann (IPMC)
Yingyi Bu
Abdullah Alamoudi
Ate Douma (IPMC)
Mike Carey
Chris A. Mattmann (IPMC)
Ian Maxon
Non-binding +1s:
Heri Ramampiaro
And no 0 or
> I understand that git is a DVCS, but by mirroring the commit content
> from one repo to the ASF (albeit via a committer middleman), we
> largely make the push records[1] pointless.
The push logs are intended to determine the committer either who
authored the contribution or is taking responsibil
+1. This is basically how I see it as well.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
>
>> On Jul 16, 2015, at 12:25 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> Can someone clarify in simple terms what the i
To meet this, do we simply need the change proposals in Gerrit (i.e.
pull requests) to have their patch contents mirrored to a proper ASF
mailing list?
- Ian
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>> As long as there's
mit. Unless there's something I am missing,
I don't understand how that's any more or less recorded or visible
than a contribution that lies in a personal fork in Github, before it
has a pull request submitted and merged.
-Ian
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Roman Shaposhnik w
think we could devise a way to notify a user
to become aware of this whenever they would register an account on the
server.
- Ian
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>
>> I guess there's some legal issue I&
Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>
>> Then what are they submitting a patch for review to, exactly?
>
> That is the question, indeed. And, please, keep in mind that the
> answer must satisfy not a humble de
5 at 8:56 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
>>
>> On 14 Jul 2015, at 15:31, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>>>
>>>> We use Gerrit as
>>>> a to
's used for- we still
clone from repositories that come downstream from ASF, not the other
way around. I'd be interested to understand how this would be
considered any different than what is done with Github Pull Requests.
- Ian
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:45 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On
> This is a severe problem and needs to be rectified promptly.
> How are commits migrating from the external repository to the ASF repository?
> We typically end up missing provenance information that is important
> in blind mirroring of content.
>
There's no blind mirroring going on here. What we
To add onto Jochen's comments, even something lesser than a hosted
Gerrit instance might suffice. The core issue for integrating our
previous Git workflow is that, as I understand it, there's no way to
have "robot" committers to ASF git. We previously had Gerrit acting on
behalf of whoever submitte
19 matches
Mail list logo
