+1 binding.
Greg
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>
>> The [DISCUSS] thread on NuttX has died down.
>>
>>
>> Accordingly, I would like to call a VOTE to accept NuttX into the
>>
>> Apache Incubator.
>>
>>
>> Please cast your vote:
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1, bring NuttX into the Incubator
>>
>> [ ] +0, I
Delinquent mentor here….
+1 binding.
Greg Trasuk.
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 7:36 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> carrying over my vote from the plc4x dev list.
>
> +1
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> Am 08.03.19, 13:02 schrieb "Julian Feinauer&q
+1 Accept Zipkin (binding).
Greg Trasuk.
> On Aug 26, 2018, at 11:14 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> After a brief discussion¹ I would like to call a VOTE to accept Zipkin into
> the Apache Incubator.
> The full proposal is available on the wiki² and is pasted below in text
+1 (binding)
Greg Trasuk
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Dec 14, 2017 15:19, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to start a VOTE to propose the PLC4X project as a podling
>&
e Guacamole
>> Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
>> projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Guacamole
>> Project; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
>> appointed to se
Langelo
>>
>>Talend:
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>
>>Planet Labs, Inc.:
>> James Muehlner
>>
>>Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University:
>> Carl Harris
>>
>>Web Age Solutions:
>>
I’m a Guacamole mentor, and I have signed-off the report on the wiki page.
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk
> On Aug 8, 2017, at 11:03 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Please find the current draft below. I'll be submitting end of day
> tomorrow assuming no issues, moving the
Does this actually need to be policy? What’s the harm to the foundation if a
project continues to use a non-Apache package name, assuming that the code was
donated appropriately?
Certainly, it should be a goal for all projects to use o.a.* package names, but
if you look around the Foundation
also of individual maintainers).
So I wonder if we’re being a little quick to shut down a community that wants
open governance.
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk
> On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:59 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> Yes, with a few binding -1's there is nothing to discuss unless Datas
> This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows
> [ X ] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator because …
i.e. +1 (Binding).
Greg Trasuk
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Ate Douma
down Tomcat because we already had an
http server?
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk.
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 7:19 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
>
> I know Apache incubator does not play favorite but it is getting awkward
> that TWO transaction engine for HBase coming to incubator at the same time.
+1 (Binding) - Greg Trasuk
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The Guacamole proposal was discussed couple of weeks ago.
>
> The complete discussion thread is available here:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/in
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 4:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
>>
>> Checked into the policies - I’m not on the IPMC, so don’t qualify as a
>> Mentor, and I think the “Interested Contributors” section is more for
out.
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> it's up to you: you can add yourself as mentor or interested contributor.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/25/2016 04:29 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
>> Hi ther
.
Should I add myself to the Additional Interested Contributors?
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Sure ! Go ahead ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/25/2016 03:37 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Thanks. I think I
Hi Daniel:
Discussion intertwined below…
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> Hi Incubator folks,
>
> I would like to propose we adopt a mentor neutrality policy for
> incubating podlings:
>
> - A mentor must not be financiall
a 72-hour vote process imposes additional overall latency on the process,
but surely the requirement to have at least three duly-empowered humans sign
off on the release isn’t that onerous!
Greg Trasuk
>
>
> --
> Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
> blog: http://blackdragsview
’ confusion on this point.
And just to be clear, I take this as valuable input from from the experts at
Incubator, not a ruling. Obviously, the River PMC makes decisions for River,
and Incubator bears no responsibility for anything we might get wrong.
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk
PMC Chair, Apache River
also not
be in the svn?
Thanks in advance,
Greg Trasuk
PMC Chair, Apache River.
If a podling steadfastly refused to add any other committers, then I think its
mentors would try to explain why that's a bad thing, and if that behaviour
continued, then the incubator would vote against graduating it.
On 2013-09-25, at 2:12 AM, Deepal jayasinghe wrote:
> Apache is community o
Are you guys wearing Apache hats or WS02 hats? If you're wearing Apache hats,
then I'd expect a bit less fealty to your CEO's request and a little more "OK,
I see your point, but I'm really excited about the project, here's what I'd
like to do on the project, do you mind adding me as an initia
en now
> it's only a shadow of what Jini used to be. I'd hate to see the same
> happen to OpenOffice.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@i
22 matches
Mail list logo
