no other votes cast, the vote
has passed.
I will shortly email the proposed resolution to the board asking for
inclusion at the next board meeting.
Many thanks,
Gary
On 10/03/13 00:31, Gary Martin wrote:
Hi,
Following the community graduation vote result announcement on the
bloodhound
appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Bloodhound Project:
* Mat Booth
* Matevž Bradač
* John Chambers
* Branko Čibej
* Joachim Dreimann
* Andrej Golcov
* Peter Koželj
* Gary Martin
* Gavin McDonald
* Ryan Ollos
* Mark Poole
* Greg Stein
* Hyrum K. Wright
* Jure Žitnik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13592158#comment-13592158
]
Gary Martin commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-22:
--
After guid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Martin resolved PODLINGNAMESEARCH-22.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Establish whether "Apache Bloodhou
Gary Martin created PODLINGNAMESEARCH-22:
Summary: Establish whether "Apache Bloodhound" is a suitable name
Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-22
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAM
+1 (non-binding)
On 05/02/13 16:18, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK, now that discussion has settled down, I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Open Climate Workbench into the Incubator.
I'll leave the VOTE open the rest of the week and close it out next
Monday, Februar
On 01/02/13 04:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hello all,
we need one more binding vote for the two running votings on Onami:
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
They are 9 days open so far... hopefully somebody else from the IPMC
can flesh out a few minutes and check them.
Tha
On 24 January 2013 18:52, Benson Margulies wrote:
> If you model the IPMC as a group of volunteers who have collectively
> volunteered to mentor and supervise new projects, then the current
> situation strongly suggests that we have either too many projects or
> not enough volunteers. Calling peo
On 24/01/13 16:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn&#
We all seem to want a bit of feature creep. I would probably include a
last update time for the page.
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take cc's as being on the list or something
On 18/01/13 11:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
...Can we somehow find a way to highlight currently running votes?...
Isn't the [VOTE] tag in subject sufficien
Hi,
It seems that we need just one more IPMC vote in order to release Apache
Bloodhound 0.4 (incubating). Sebb has not yet indicated whether he is
happy with Brane's response but would anyone else like to look and
perhaps give us a final vote?
Cheers,
Gary
On 18/01/13 11:03, Branko Čibe
On 29/10/12 14:22, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the second release of
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC.
The result of the vote is summarised here:
http://markmail.org/thread/zrgkleendi
The Apache Bloodhound (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the
availability of the Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0-incubating release.
Apache Bloodhound is a project to provide a tool to track progress and
defects in projects, with a primary focus on software projects. Standing
on the shoulders of
Sorry.. I appeared to forget to change the subject to reflect the vote
ending.
Cheers,
Gary
On 10/08/12 01:07, Gary Martin wrote:
Hi,
So, it looks like we have already passed the 72 hour point and I am
pleased to note that we also appear to have a result.
All IPMC binding votes from
part.
Cheers,
Gary
On 07/08/12 00:07, Gary Martin wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first
release Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful
vote by the Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from
the IPMC members Greg Stei
Committing somewhere would be good as otherwise I don't know whether I
need to suggest the following (I wasn't sure of the best thread for this
to go in anyway):
May I suggest that, where appropriate, the documentation is backed
up with pointers to examples of existing projects that are
On 08/07/2012 12:39 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 07.08.2012 13:14, ant elder wrote:
This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
people are
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC
members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
The result of the vote is summarised here
As someone who is currently attempting to go through their first
release, I am not really in the category of someone who could be in such
a taskforce. However, I am very interested in seeing an improvement in
the release documentation. I would certainly consider looking back over
my recent expe
20 matches
Mail list logo
