+1 (non-binding)
Enrique
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/12/06, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The asc and KEYS files are available on the page now.
Please start reviewing our release again. The URL stays the same:
http://people.apache.org/~rickhall/felix-0.8.0-incubator.html
Robert's "notes and comments" are duly noted by the Felix co
Graph from this week's Economist:
http://www.economist.com/images/20060318/CSF427.gif
Full story:
http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=5624944
Enrique
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
On 10/2/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Now, Noel's suggestion for OSGi as the runtime platform is interesting, if for
> no other reason than it allows for hot deploy and reloads. But I think it
> would be possible to provide a BundleActivator and register the service(s)
> even
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The Apache Software Foundation has applied to participate on the JSR.
Currently, the ASF projects interested in this JSR are Harmony and
Maven. I assume that people from OSCAR are?
Yes, Richard Hall of Oscar.
Enrique
geir
Enrique
-
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
+1 .. do you guys plan for Oscar to become a JSR 277 impl as well? Are
the ASF folks on that JSR involved with Oscar?)
Hi, Sanjiva,
I don't know if any Apache folks are on that JSR, but Richard Hall (of
Oscar and this proposal) has applied to be, as an individual.
Hi,
Overnight we gained 5 more supporters.
Heejune Ahn (Independent)
Yalcin Akdogan (Zeroadmin Software)
Juan C. Dueñas (ITEA/Eureka researcher and Associate Professor, DIT-UPM)
José L. Ruiz (PhD Candidate, DIT-UPM)
Manuel Santillan (PhD Candidate, DIT-UPM)
Enrique
On Thu, 2005
Alex Karasulu wrote:
[X] Graduate the Directory Project
[ ] Abstain
[ ] Keep incubating the Directory Project
-enrique
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[x] +1 I support this release and am willing to help
[ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
[ ] -0 I do not support this release
[ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons
---
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Okay, but just to mention one of my pet peeves: "refactoring" projects
into independent components within an open source project is like polishing
rocks: the result may be a bunch of really cool stones, but that will still
suck if what the user actually wants is a stone wall.
Regarding "snickers," I like the simple (boring) descriptive names, so
I'd go with "Apache ASN.1 Library" and asn1 for a package name.
For point of reference Bouncy Castle uses org.bouncycastle.asn1, along
with numerous other Java ASN.1 codecs.
-enrique
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
5) Kerberos is a trademark of MIT. We cannot legally distribute
software under that name.
I disagree.
1) I find no record that MIT has a trademark on Kerberos. The USPTO
Trademark Electronic Search System shows efforts by MIT to trademark
Kerberos in the early 90's w
12 matches
Mail list logo
