Hi -
>
> > On Jul 5, 2018, at 4:45 AM, Edward Capriolo
> wrote:
> >
> > Also at one point the project was assigned a "shepard" who never signed
> off
> > on a single report even when the project was active. His first
> interaction
> > for the proj
Also what is the point of forcing us into this monthly reporting cycle? It
is kinda stressing me out. Is this a new thing just to harass me into
retirement.
Also I asked about this:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/Suggestion-for-podling-reminder-report-emails-td59035.html
. Wh
Also at one point the project was assigned a "shepard" who never signed off
on a single report even when the project was active. His first interaction
for the project was vote to moth ball it.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:35 AM, Edward Capriolo
wrote:
> I want to get this out there.
I want to get this out there. I do not know why everyone is stuck on
gossip. There are some TLP that do not have activity for years and podlings
much older then gossip. I can give numerous examples.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:10 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> That sounds like retirement to me. The w
Hey all,
I have been personally slacking a bit, but I wanted to point something out.
I subscribe to the mailing lists of 4 podlings. The email I get has a
subject of
"Podling Report Reminder - June 2018"
The email is addressed to dev@gossip But with gmail you actually do not
see that until y
ORC to name a few competing projects that address similar needs
> with a different approach each with their own strengths and weaknesses.
>
> Your concerns are valid and should be addressed during incubation (ensuring
> cross project collaboration, building more diversity, ...)
>
> On Fri,
ng.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Von Gosling
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I will give +1(Non-binding), but,
> > >
> > > I have the similar question about so many str
I believe heron and storm should be merged back together. I do not see the
value of storm and a storm fork in the asf.
On Thursday, June 22, 2017, Bill Graham wrote:
> Thanks Taylor for relaying these sentiments, especially the part about the
> Heron website which is indeed poorly worded (I susp
The vote passes.
+1
-
Josh Elser
P. Taylor Goetz
John D. Ament
0
-
(nil)
-1
-
(nil)
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eaeb1a90c166e1ef59abc6f702a07a73d5ca25f5ddf1e696ca532a79@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Wade Chandler
wrote:
> I have used Gitter; not a good product honestly; not really comparable. IRC
> has limitations in the editing and group experience. The others require
> keeping up infrastructure. Slack just works, and works well for what it
> does. Some of u
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:40 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> +1 to release.
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:03 PM Edward Capriolo
> wrote:
>
> > I am pleased to call an IPMC vote for gossip-0.1.2-incubating.
> >
> > The PPMC vote thread is here:
> >
>
I am pleased to call an IPMC vote for gossip-0.1.2-incubating.
The PPMC vote thread is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5571d2996633f3a7ed10f3b0de3366702027db3b2f7870403c390141@%3Cdev.gossip.apache.org%3E
Additionally a description of the new features in the release is here:
https://l
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Edward J. Yoon
wrote:
> Thanks for your proposal.
>
> I of course think Apache Hama can be used for scheduling sync and async
> communication/computation networks with various topologies and resource
> allocation. However, I'm not sure whether this approach is als
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Tsengdar,
>
> Can you give a rationale for your vote?
>
> Have you reviewed the history of the situation?
>
> Do you think that the current situation is acceptable?
>
> What do you think will change the current situation?
>
> Why didn't you vo
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:40 AM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sounds quite interesting :) It might also be an idea to provide a home for
> implementations of other hardware that can drive GPIO pins and can control
> similar sensors and other devices. I'm thinking of an Arduino, or something
> like an ES
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Edward Capriolo
> wrote:
> > I know IOT is a super hot buzz word but here me out. This is not one of
> > those attempts to brand a some random piece of software as IOT :)
>
> Ye
I know IOT is a super hot buzz word but here me out. This is not one of
those attempts to brand a some random piece of software as IOT :)
When working with hardware there are a few common protocols. SPI, I2C, and
GPIO. That are supported by a majority of the electronics
http://www.mouser.com/Produ
The vote passes: The results of the VOTE was:
+1 : 5
0: 0
-1:0
+1 (binding)
Justin Mclean
Drew Farris
John D. Ament
P. Taylor Goetz
Josh Elser
Vote Thread:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Gossip-version-gossip-0-1-1-incubating-RC2-td53327.html
Thank you everyon
/0.1.1-incubating/
> but
> I could find no such WAR.
> - While its OK for the staged release vote to use nexus, your final source
> distribution must be on
> - Gossip's download page is out of compliance (sort of). Specifically you
> should not link to github on your downloads
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
Thank you,
Edward
Below is a copy of the [RESULT] for voting:
-
The vote for gossip-0.1.1-incubating (RC2) has passed.
Josh Elser +1
P. Taylor Goetz +1
Gary Dusbabek +1
Chandresh Pancholi +1
Edward Capriolo +1
The vote thread is here
e file is in the
> release it should have a valid header.
>
> Release processes are interesting. Given a similar set of developers, its
> surprisingly high how frequently release steps will differ between
> projects. Even when it comes to a build. Some projects like to have an
> exp
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:42 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:23 AM Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:36 PM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > So, instead of tying the "incubating" marker to "incubating", I would
> > favor
> > > > a system of marker(s) in
Great news. You Apache Streams had a going out of business sale that went
so well their back in business !
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:08 PM, apache wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On September 23, 2016 at 12:51:30 PM, Suneel Marthi (smar...@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
>
Sorry for a lazy question. Can you point me at the proces you have
ant/maven/shell/jenkins/whatever that builds the dockers. I would be
interested in seeing if I can apply that elsewhere.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Mike Jumper
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We, Apache Guacamole (incubating), woul
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EdwardCapriolo
I require access.
Hook a brother up!
(Humor)
Subspace communication coming in.
http://www.startrek.com/uploads/assets/db_articles/0379b23e9845c9c652488c13f7bb557fc62a3642.jpg
Quark votes -1 on change
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Kathy Saunders
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> > That thread was
t is essential for Toree to be truly
> open.
>
> Shankar
>
>
>
> On Fri, 20 May 2016 at 09:42 Alex Harui wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 5/20/16, 9:32 AM, "Edward Capriolo" wrote:
> >
> > >Yes if you are using a feature specific to a specific
e.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/20/16, 8:57 AM, "Edward Capriolo" wrote:
>
> >" You could argue that it makes the dependency optional"
> >Yes that is what I am saying. Like in a JDBC application you may be
> >con
erver as a jar in this case.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/20/16, 7:23 AM, "Edward Capriolo" wrote:
>
> >Would it be acceptable to develop a shim layer toree can link to that and
> >the provider is dropped in at runtime like
Would it be acceptable to develop a shim layer toree can link to that and
the provider is dropped in at runtime like the jdbc interface?
On Thursday, May 19, 2016, Craig Russell wrote:
> I found Jim’s message from February 24 in which he says that for one
> release, he’s ok with having the LGPL
h 14 binding +1 votes, 8
> non-binding
> > +1 votes and not 0 or -1 votes.
> >
> > Vote tally (* indicates a binding vote):
> >
> > +1:
> > P. Taylor Goetz*
> > Chris Nauroth*
> > Joe Witt
> > Josh Elser*
> > Amol Kekre
> >
I would suggest, my feeling is that tools that work with more than one
nosql have a better chance at success. Are there plans for hbase/Cassandra
support?
On Thursday, April 28, 2016, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Josh Elser > wrote:
> > Any feedback here, folks?
th a small amount of promotion on
> twitter and through blogging, we have 50+ followers on Github and several
> forks of the project. With the Apache brand we should be able to attract
> more. Once we have entered the incubator we believe it will be easier to
> attempt to unify with other sim
@P. Taylor,
Thanks for the detailed recap. As you mentioned we did contact those
authors hoping to hear back.
When I did the fork I did inform the original author:
https://code.google.com/archive/p/java-gossip/issues/2
IIRC the owner this event with a like or a +1 (or whatever they provided),
bu
That is a good plan to understand the code hand over. I mentioned this in
another reply, but if this presents and issue I am more than happy to do a
clean room implementation. There are a few reasons for this:
Firstly, we want to make a spec so that other implementations in other
languages can be
"One question I have, just because the googlecode shutdown is pretty
confusing. Was this development originally from this group (e.g. was it
originally Edward Capriolo?) or was it someone else that may need to pursue
a SGA from?"
Good question.
The development was not originally from
be easier to attempt to unify with other similar implementations.
== Core Developers ==
The code was forked on Jan 9th 2015, since then there have been 4
releases and 55 commits. The majority of th work is by Edward
Capriolo. Several people are interested in the features of this
proposal and have
37 matches
Mail list logo
