+1.
Eddie
On Feb 16, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
wrote:
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009,
+1 -- am excited to have CouchDB starting incubation.
On Feb 9, 2008 11:51 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> +1
>
>
> Craig L Russell wrote:
> | +1
> |
> | Craig
> |
> | On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> |
> |> Proj
+1
Eddie
On Nov 28, 2007 6:59 PM, Gav... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
> >
> > [X] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
> > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
>
> (nb)
>
> Gav...
>
>
> >
> >
> > = Abstract =
>
+1 -- cool project and great name!
On Nov 11, 2007 12:57 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 09/11/2007, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Shindig Proposal
> > --
> >
> > = Abstract =
> >
> > Shindig will develop the container and backend server components
+1!
Eddie
On 10/31/07, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPMC
>
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 -- and Brian said it well "good folks, good community, good code!"
Best of luck out there in the wild. :)
Eddie
On 5/9/07, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 Good folks, good community, good code!
-Brian
On May 8, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Dear Incuba
+1 -- good luck out in the World!
Eddie
On 5/4/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Cheers
Niclas
On 5/3/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
> include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
>
> Please c
+1 (binding)
Also, I'm all for requesting that incubating projects requesting
IPMC approval of a release provide a RAT report as well as
explanations for any missing license headers since that's a focus of a
lot of the ensuing conversation about a release.
Eddie
On 4/26/07, Michael Dick <[EM
+1
On 4/15/07, Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Brian McCallister wrote:
>
>
>> I think wadi withdrew from incubation. It seems
>> alive here: http://wadi.codehaus.org/
>>
>
> Correct.
>
> +1 to formally retire it.
>
> --- Noel
>
+1
Bill
--
I've got one of these coming for OpenJPA (apologies that it's late...).
This is pending a couple hours of community review -- once it's
done, I'll just commit it straight into the agenda.
Eddie
On 12/19/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just added the ActiveMQ one. Apologies
7;hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Incubator Folks-
The final tally of the vote is:
+1 votes:
Davanum Srinivas (binding)
Robert Burrell Donkin (binding)
Patrick Linskey
Kevin Sutter
Eddie O'Neil
Geir Magnusson Jr. (binding)
0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 0
The vote pas
+1 to release. Thanks for the feedback, Robert.
Eddie
On 11/28/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/28/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Nov 27, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
> > Robert-
> >
> >> -- minor issues (fine by m
I agree that we should instill Best Practice, which (IMHO) means
that podlings should learn a "real" Apache release process including
voting on new bits before graduating into the wild.
More today than ever, a podling controls the smoothness its release
cycle given improved Incubator documentat
On Robert's point about IP clearance, I'd marked that as TODO
because I didn't see an obvious place where the code grant for OpenJPA
had been recorded from BEA.
Geir, do you know where this might be? I did check grants.txt but
might have missed it.
Thanks.
Eddie
On 11/16/06, Craig L Russe
Count me in as a remote participant as well (as with Jean, I won't
be in Dublin). I owe documentation on what to do when getting out of
the incubator as a TLP including info on final releases and the Maven
repo.
Eddie
On 6/7/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/7/06, robert bur
Geir--
Hey -- long time listener, first time mentor. :)
Is there a ppmc@ list and should mentors grant themselves SVN
permission or do we leave that to you?
Thanks.
Eddie
On 5/1/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I created the lists for Open JPA :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 (non-binding)
On 3/19/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> --- Noel
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---
I can speak from our Beehive experience moving from Incubator to TLP.
When we graduated, Infra successfully migrated all of our:
beehive-@incubator.apache.org
into:
@beehive.apache.org
including all of our subscribers and message history. Thanks, much
Infra! :) The merged archive
David--
Yeah -- apologies; I don't usually leave the publish step for someone
else. Was pressed for time and just wanted to get the change done.
Thanks for covering it.
Eddie
David Crossley wrote:
Author: ekoneil
Date: Fri Dec 2 17:07:17 2005
New Revision: 351863
URL: http://svn.ap
I don't speak in any official capacity here and just want to point
something out...
Under repos/asf/incubator/projects/ftpserver/javadoc, it appears
that the entire Javadoc API for the project is committed to
site-publish.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/pr
And, I'm updating the web page now.
Kenneth Tam wrote:
I'll follow up separately with Cliff to see whether a CLA ever
actually made it to Apache, but in any case he has been inactive since
day 1 and should be removed.
On 7/15/05, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 12, 2005
And, I'd thought Beehive had that -- apologies that it's not on the
website; I'll get that corrected this morning.
At least it's on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/beehive/
:)
Thanks for pointing it out.
Eddie
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
The Incubator policy page is very
The 1.0m1 release is out.
Binaries are here:
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/v1.0m1/apache-beehive-incubating-1.0m1.zip
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/v1.0m1/apache-beehive-incubating-1.0m1.tar.gz
The complete set of archives (binary|docs|lib|src) is here:
http://cv
Fat fingered the name below -- we'd like to release this as "1.0m1".
:)
Eddie
Eddie ONeil wrote:
All--
Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
are now posted here:
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
I'm proposing tha
CIL...
Leo Simons wrote:
On 31-05-2005 03:51, "Eddie O'Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've heard a couple of times that it's not possible to do a -final
release from the Incubator, but I've also heard some suggest that it
could be possible.
Noel--
I've heard a couple of times that it's not possible to do a -final
release from the Incubator, but I've also heard some suggest that it
could be possible.
Didn't Derby do one of these in December 2004 as per:
http://incubator.apache.org/derby/derby_downloads.html#Official+Releases
Comments in-line...
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On May 29, 2005, at 8:21 AM, Eddie ONeil wrote:
All--
There has been some confusion publicly and privately about the JSR
181 TCK issues and the WSM part of Beehive.
The goals of WSM are to implement the JSR 181 specification and to
provid
g, Noel, etc. are watching from general@incubator.apache.org, they
may not have seen your comments, Eddie.
- jeremiah
-Original Message-
From: Eddie O'Neil
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 8:42 PM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: Re: [vote] beehive v1 milestone 1 release
One other t
d the actual release was going to be some additional
documentation.
But, we're new to this whole process, so if that doesn't work (or
isn't sufficient), then just let me know and we can repropose on Tuesday
as needed.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
Eddie
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
All--
The blocking bugs have been dealt with and we've been adding
documentation and samples furiously over the last couple of weeks.
At this point, I'd like to propose that we release a Beehive 1.0
milestone 1. The code is ready to go -- though I believe that a few
committers have some
30 matches
Mail list logo
