<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om>To
David L Kaminsky/Raleigh/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],
11/10/2007 10:46 Mike Nunez <[EMAIL
All,
I updated the proposal to include the new proposed project name. Imperius
seems
to be cleaner than the alternatives.
I also added the references to the DMTF's IP policy.
Please let me know if there are more questions. (Please CC
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks, David
Abstract
-
Hey Alex,
I looked at the access control for Triplesec, and it looks somewhat like
XACML from Oasis:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xacml
Here are my general thoughts on the overlap between SPL and access control
languages:
1. It is possible to express access contr
I spoke to some of the developers here, and we're down to two names:
1) Smores - "Mores" are social customs, which relates to policy, but Smores
taste better.
2) Imperio - the curse used to gain complete control of another.
If anyone has an objection to either name, please let me know. Otherwise
cc
general@incubator.apache.org, David
L Kaminsky/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED], W G
09/17/2007 01:53 Stoddard/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PM
Thanks for the quick response on the SPL proposal. I've tried to gather
the questions and respond to them in one e-mail. Please me know if I
missed anything.
David
Naming
-
Seems like the consensus is that SPL isn't a good name. We'll find
another. (Not sure I could get IBM t
nswer any questions that you have.
Cheers,
David
David L. Kaminsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Abstract
-
Policy systems allow administrators to define policies that guide the
automated administration of resources. Such automation saves time and
effort by simplifying resource-management.
