be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache FreeMarker" be
> > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > of the Apache Free
On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 17:13 -0800, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be
> > editable by Mentors/IPMC members?
>
> It's editable by anyone whose wiki username we add to the
> Contri
+1
-David (jonesde@a.o)
> On 25 May 2016, at 13:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept CarbonData
> into the Incubator.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator
> [ ] +0 Abstain
> [ ] -1 Do not accept
Thanks John, worked just fine.
-David
> On 11 Apr 2016, at 17:25, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Please give it a shot in a minute or two (moin moin is slow slow)
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:33 PM David E Jones wrote:
>
>>
>>
I’m helping as a mentor for the FreeMarker project so need access to sign
reports (namely on this page now: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016).
My Apache username (and account on wiki.a.o) is ‘jonesde’.
Thank you,
-David
---
Report time for FreeMarker has come around again and I still don’t have
permission to edit wiki pages to sign the report, currently the page at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
Am I going about this wrong?
-David
> On 4 Jan 2016, at 09:15, David E Jones wrote:
>
>
I'm not sure if this is the best forum for this discussion, but it's a
good discussion and I also can't really think of a better forum!
So
On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
There are various commercial vendors doing this sort of thing. Most
are aimed at having doing in
On Jan 22, 2008, at 8:41 AM, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
Ahmad Khalifa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ultimately, what this would be good for, is to offer several
pre-built applications along the lines of CRM, ERP, Accounting, POS,
etc... just like some already available application
Burrel Donkin, Davanum Srinivas, Noel Bergman
+1 - 2 (Non-binding): David E. Jones, Christian Geisert
+0 - 0
-1 - 0
Thanks again to everyone who have helped get OFBiz to this point. I
have been very impressed with the activity and interest by many
people throughout the incubation process and
On Nov 22, 2006, at 8:06 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
I'm guessing we'll close this vote next Monday, after the long
holiday weekend?
Because activity has slowed on this vote I was thinking of announcing
the result today, but there is no hurry so Monday is fine.
-David
On 11/20/06, Noe
roject; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of The
Apache Open For Business Project:
* David E. Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Jacopo Cappellato ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Si Chen([EMA
Robert,
This does look like a good start.
Based on recently going through this (or trying to...) with OFBiz I
found quite a bit of good information in the Policy guide and was
able to divine more or less what needed to be done, but there is
little indication of the order of doing things.
d_mbox/incubator-ofbiz-dev/
200611.mbox/browser
It's in the November 2006 archives, currently on page 5 within those
archives. The thread subject is [VOTE] OFBiz Graduate from Apache
Incubator. The binding votes are from David E. Jones, Hans Bakker, Si
Chen, Al Byers, Jacques Le Roux, Jacopo Ca
On Nov 14, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The Apache Open For Business Project community has voted internally
and agreed on readiness to graduate from the Apache Incubator
The vote passed with 8 binding +1 votes
Those would be which ones? I do not see 8 binding votes (yet).
I
The Apache Open For Business Project community has voted internally
and agreed on readiness to graduate from the Apache Incubator based
on the Incubator Policy exit guidelines here:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Exiting
+the+Incubator
The vote passed with
e with a branch and so on.
Thanks again for Robert Donkin for his thorough review of all of this
and help getting things cleaned up.
-David
On Nov 1, 2006, at 10:20 PM, David E Jones wrote:
The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus
internally approving the 4.0.0 TS5 test
On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:40 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 11/7/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 5, 2006, at 3:52 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 11/2/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read through the stuff on the 3party.html page
On Nov 5, 2006, at 3:52 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 11/2/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus
internally approving the 4.0.0 TS5 test snapshot release. We are now
requesting a vote for review and approval fr
Robert, others interested,
I'm still not sure whether or not we will want to do this going
forward because I'm not sure how a source distribution would be used
for a project like OFBiz. Still, if there is any demand for it then I
agree we should do it.
However we go in the future, this w
The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus
internally approving the 4.0.0 TS5 test snapshot release. We are now
requesting a vote for review and approval from the general Incubator
group and the Incubator PMC.
The current incubation docs recommend doing this sort of "t
On Oct 20, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
I think this looks good, too. However, it has some content at the
bottom:
***
Apache 2.0
***
...
***
JDBM LICENSE v1.00 (BSD)
On Sep 28, 2006, at 8:05 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 9/28/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
I'm one of the OFBiz committers and I'd like to thank you for your
great
scrutiny: this is very helpful and we are currently working to fix
all the
issues that yo
On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
NOTICE should not have the list of licenses that apply - that's for
the
LICENSE file.
NOTICE should contain any required informational notices required
by those
licenses. For example, JDBM (the last entry in LICENSE) requires
in Clau
I've done another pass on the LICENSE file to hopefully address this
problem, but I'm not really sure that I understood exactly what it
needs to look like, so feedback on this would be great.
The updated LICENSE and NOTICE files are available here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator
On Sep 25, 2006, at 10:56 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
(FYI a source distribution is required but i'm assume that you know
how to svn export)
Do you mean a separate source distribution is needed?
In the past, as with this test snapshot, we have just included the
source and binary in th
Thanks Leo and Justin for pointing this out. We'll get it fixed
(along with some other things too probably, thanks to Leo for some
good feedback) and make another test snapshot to submit for a vote.
-David
On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:04 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 9/25/06, Leo Simons <[EM
The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus
internally approving the 4.0.0 TS3 test snapshot release. We are now
requesting a vote for review and approval from the general Incubator
group and the Incubator PMC.
The current incubation docs recommend doing this sort of "t
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:26 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
On 2/13/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
J Aaron,
thanks for your feedback.
Sorry but I still have some doubts about this:
if a guy signs an iCLA in which he states that he agrees to release
under the ASL all the work (present a
On Feb 10, 2006, at 4:51 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question for you: what is the iCLA template we should
collect from the OFBiz's contributors? The one here:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
?
If so, maybe I'm wrong but... I don't see how this document will
a
On Feb 8, 2006, at 2:12 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Actually, it is only needed from everyone who might own copyright
to some part of the work. So, it is those people who have contributed
functionality greater than a simple bug fix.
OTOH, the mentors should be aware that, because this work is
oing on the list and start sending out requests...
-David
On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 8, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 08.02.2006 09:48:39 Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/7/06, David E. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any guideline
On Feb 4, 2006, at 6:04 AM, David N. Welton wrote:
*) IP clearance checklist - I need to make a copy of that in SVN here,
/incubator/site-author/ip-clearance. I'll try and get that done over
the weekend.
I have some questions specific to the IP clearance issue for OFBiz. I
looked at the le
On Jan 24, 2006, at 8:44 PM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
= OFBiz Proposal =
+1 (non-binding)
I'm obviously a little biased on this because of my involvement in
OFBiz and not sure if my vote is even appropriate, but I wanted to
make sure everyone kn
This isn't a problem at all. That is an area that we have tried to
make more clear over time, ie that Undersun does not own nor have any
exclusive relationship with the OFBiz project. This is actually one
thing that I really like about the potential OFBiz/ASF relationship:
it clarifies th
On Jan 12, 2006, at 6:00 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 13 January 2006 04:27, David E. Jones wrote:
As I understand it in order to become a top level project the Board
must be the sponsor, which is why the proposal was written that way.
That is a misconception. For projects targetting
On Jan 12, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
There IS a conceptual and code-level separation between the OFBiz
framework and components built on top of it, but I think it makes a
nice cohesive project together. It's sort of like if Tomcat and
Struts were under the same umbrella: not necess
On Jan 12, 2006, at 11:57 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
This proposal has caught my interest. I'd be willing to help mentor.
That would be great. I've been skimming through the policy emails
that have been on this list for the last few days and it's sounding
like 3 mentors is something that wo
37 matches
Mail list logo
