+1 (non binding)
David
On Tuesday, 23 October 2012, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Hi incubator people,
>
> I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
> The last few months we have been working on this release.
> Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the requi
Small correction: Universal OSGi is an RFP, not a whitepaper. In fact,
it's RFP 89.
I'm currently working to see if I can distribute this RFP to a wider audience.
Best regards,
David
On 4 October 2010 23:36, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> On 24 Sep 2010, at 17:28 , Marcel Offermans wrote:
>
>> On 24
Hi Noel,
On 27 September 2010 18:18, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> So why aren't you looking at SCA? From where I sit, you'd be best to work
> with C bindings for SCA, and let the SCA adapters manage remote protocols.
Exactly this discussion was held when the OSGi Remote Services (now
chapter 13 of
2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet
>
> Sounds good to me. We need to set up the trunk/tags/branches first I
> think.
>
I don't seem to have the permissions to create these. Could someone create
them or give me enough permissions so I could?
Cheers,
David
2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:24, David Bosschaert
> wrote:
> > Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a
> > shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
> > I'd also like to rename some things from Geron
Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a
shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Finally, should we asking INFRA for a Hudson build? Or is this normally not
done for podlings?
Cheers,
David
2009
