On 9/10/24 14:24, rdb...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to modifying the download page. Would it also make sense for an IPMC
member to remove the source artifacts?
Yes, or rather, move it back to /dist/dev/ so it goes away on our
download CDN, then move it back to /dist/release/ once the vote has
finali
On 8/1/24 12:42, Alex Porcelli wrote:
Dear IPMC members,
The KIE podling is preparing for its first Apache release. Due to the
numerous artifacts we build across various repositories (container
images, Java libraries, web apps, etc.), we seek to automate the SVN
upload as part of our release pro
y one would try visiting a URL that never
existed in the first place.
In any case, this would be moot if the incubator prefix was dropped
going forward.
Hope my explanation is clear~
Imba Jin
On 2024/05/08 14:53:13 Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 5/8/24 09:45, sebb wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 15
On 5/8/24 09:45, sebb wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 15:15, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 5/8/24 03:20, Sheng Wu wrote:
sebb 于2024年5月8日周三 16:12写道：
Remember that the purpose of the incubator prefix is to clearly signal
that the code is under Incubation.
It is essential that this change does not
On 5/8/24 03:20, Sheng Wu wrote:
sebb 于2024年5月8日周三 16:12写道：
Remember that the purpose of the incubator prefix is to clearly signal
that the code is under Incubation.
It is essential that this change does not result in losing this indication.
AFAICT, for most podlings, dropping the incubator
On 5/8/24 07:52, Imba Jin wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
In addition, I found that the new GitHub repo created through the
"selfserve.apache.org" page before, the default is not configured to
automatically jump the 'incubator' address(return 404), which caused some unexpected
problems..
Could you
+1, binding.
On 3/12/24 19:36, Craig Russell wrote:
After this discussion
https://lists.apache.org/thread/frwsy1g1pkx3ppbvzt538xxh9qo9y319
I'd like to propose that we make the incubator. part of the URL optional for
podlings.
This is a way to minimize the work needed to graduate. No redirect o
On 1/23/24 15:49, PJ Fanning wrote:
Hi Alex,
While reproducible builds are a great idea, the Incubator PMC does not
require them. Plugging away at improving things so that reproducible
builds can be produced in future is a useful thing to do.
This may be related to https://issues.apache.org/ji
On 2023-09-18 15:20, Gláucia Esppenchutz wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am pleased to announce that the vote for Apache Wayang(Incubating)
v0.7.1 RC3 has now concluded. Thank you all for your review and
participation in the voting process.
I am happy to inform you that the release voting has passed w
On 2023-08-18 09:54, Calvin Kirs wrote:
Hi Mohammad,
We usually just need one champion, I see David expressing interest and
I think he is a good champion.
David would not be admissible as a champion, as that requires a person
to be either a foundation member or officer. See
https://incubator
Julian
On Jul 31, 2023, at 3:51 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hi incubator folks,
over at Infra, we occasionally have requests to retire podlings, and while we
do have a specific set of policies for TLPs, it gets a bit vague when it comes
to podlings. I have tried looking for the IPMC's own guid
On 2023-08-02 16:41, Alex Porcelli wrote:
Is there an infrastructure in Apache for CI (Jenkins, etc) for its projects?
See https://infra.apache.org/build-supported-services.html
If yes, where can we find more information on how to onboard?
If not, how do projects deal with CI infrastructure
Hi incubator folks,
over at Infra, we occasionally have requests to retire podlings, and
while we do have a specific set of policies for TLPs, it gets a bit
vague when it comes to podlings. I have tried looking for the IPMC's own
guidelines, but it seems that the retirement guide does not exist
On 2023-07-04 11:44, Claude Warren wrote:
You could try the Petri route if the devs are ASF members.
Regardless of the route chosen, for an official release you will always
need to adhere to the standard release process (72+ hours, min 3x+1,
more +1s than -1s, must be ALv2, etc etc). I don't
On 2023-07-03 12:52, PJ Fanning wrote:
Adding the Incubator general list.
My view would be that non-snapshot binary artifacts should be signed
with a personal signing key - ideally the signing key that was used to
release the related source release. Unfortunately, this would mean
adding a user's
On 2023-06-27 15:51, Brian Proffitt wrote:
Okay, but what if they have namespace issues with code pointing to their
existing GH repos? We had asked about this a while back, and I thought the
take away was we could keep the existing GH repos in place.
That is where transfers come into play. If a
I would not modify the copyright notice. As it stands in the document
right now, it is set to expire in the year 2111. If you modify, you are
(incorrectly) extending that by a few years without any explicit request
or consent from Lightbend.
Copyright notices are mainly a guard against noncomp
On 2023-06-21 15:25, Jia Fan wrote:
Hi Justin, SeaTunnel already graduated, are we still need report to
incubator?
No. Your reporting schedule can be found at reporter.apache.org - that's
the only one you need to follow. Disregard this message :)
Justin Mclean 于2023年6月21日周三 20:45写道：
Hi,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Gruno deleted INCUBATOR-276:
---
> Usability issues with WebMod list moderator p
On 2022-10-20 14:59, Dave Fisher wrote:
+1. Infra provides both urls immediately and incubator versions of urls live in
the codebase forever.
Correct, we specifically made this change (from foo.incubator.a.o to
foo.a.o) so that we would not have to migrate mailing lists after
graduation, whi
On 2022-10-18 14:34, Julian Hyde wrote:
One idea is to schedule a review after the project has been in the
incubator longer than the median time (say after 2 years). Deep-dive
into what is going right and wrong, identify things that can be fixed,
and set targets. And schedule another review a yea
ote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 10:45 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 2022-10-06 07:15, Calvin Kirs wrote:
Hi,
We are missing reports from:
- EventMesh
- HugeGraph
- MarvinAI
- Nuttx
- Spot
- Teaclave
- PonyMail
We are missing mentor sign-off on:(Mentor signoff due by end of days
is Tue Oct 9)
- DataLa
On 2022-10-06 07:15, Calvin Kirs wrote:
Hi,
We are missing reports from:
- EventMesh
- HugeGraph
- MarvinAI
- Nuttx
- Spot
- Teaclave
- PonyMail
We are missing mentor sign-off on:(Mentor signoff due by end of days
is Tue Oct 9)
- DataLab
- Flagon
- Milagro
I suspect ApacheCon is causing some
On 02/11/2021 06.42, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
My understanding is that https://www.apache.org/dist/ has been deprecated.
So for Pony Mail I would I change these links to go via
https://downloads.apache.org/
- https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ponymail/KEYS
-
https://www.apache.org/di
Could you tell me what's wrong with the pony mail links?
/dist/ redirects to downloads.apache.org so technically it's valid.
with regards,
Daniel.
On 02/11/2021 04.09, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
A while back we asked projects to correct their download pages, however I’m
still seeing a lot of iss
On 19/07/2021 12.03, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:
I am trying to access the Apache Incubator's web page
https://incubator.apache.org/
But it returned with an error message
Misdirected Request
The client needs a new connection for this request as the requested host
name does not match the Server Name
On 14/04/2021 09.06, Jian Qiu wrote:
Hi, Dave,
When we decide to donate project to Apache Incubator, we consider several
candidate names and make a vote in our community, the results are
as follows:
* YunionCloud - a cloud union of Clouds, 26 vote
* UnioneCloud - to unify many clouds into One C
On 05/08/2020 00.51, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Podling report are due today and currently we’re waiting on the following
projects.
Annotator
BlueMarlin
Doris
Liminal
Livy
NLPCraft
Pinot
S2Graph
SDAP
Sedona
Training
Tuweni
Warble
Warble effectively retired/went dormant, FWIW.
Don't expect a re
On 13/05/2020 20.47, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Folks, just as a reminder. We are approaching 72 hours. Please provide your
comments sooner than later!
There's no real time limit for discussion to graduate. I just wait for the
conversation to die down, but input from other IPMC members would
Hi folks,
I am pleased to announce the release of Apache Pony Mail (incubating)
version 0.11.
You may download Pony Mail 0.11 at:
http://ponymail.incubator.apache.org/downloads.html
Fixes in Pony Mail 0.11 include:
##
Bug: Tidy up list
On 09/04/2019 15.00, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:41 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
...The Apache NetBeans podling community brings the resolution, after
discussion[1]...
Enthusiastic +1, with my NetBeans mentor hat on.
And me t, +1 with my mentor hat on!
-Bertra
On 3/14/19 10:34 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hi folks,
This is a vote to release 0.11 of Apache Pony Mail (incubating).
The vote passed on dev@ponymail with 5x +1 and no 0s or -1s.
Three binding IPMC +1s carry over in this vote (humbedooh, johndament,
jleroux).
Since there were no additional
Hi folks,
This is a vote to release 0.11 of Apache Pony Mail (incubating).
The vote passed on dev@ponymail with 5x +1 and no 0s or -1s.
Three binding IPMC +1s carry over in this vote (humbedooh, johndament,
jleroux).
Artifacts are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/p
On 3/6/19 10:07 PM, Dmitriy Pavlov wrote:
Hi Daniel,
There are two independent questions here.
1) Removal question and its allowance in general: this question asked
during every talk I gave related to ASF. My fellows ask me if someone can
remove Committer or PMCs. Some folks think it is possib
On 3/6/19 9:08 PM, Dmitriy Pavlov wrote:
Hi Ross,
Thank you for your reply. Apache Ignite PMCs do not support this idea, so
inactive PMCs will be still there.
But still, it is not clear for me in general, why following
projects/guidelines contains removal procedure for Committer PMC:
- https://
On 3/6/19 4:47 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Merit does not expire. People who are not active today should be able to become
active tomorrow without having to jump through approval hoops.
In projects there is no concept of emeritus PMC. Here in the IPMC the issue is
very different. Most people earn
On 2/28/19 8:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hmm... in less than 20mins the request for Rainbow was shut down...
I'm not sure how I feel about this... The justification seems a real stretch to
me:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/PODLINGNAMESEARCH/issues/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-164?filter=a
On 2/9/19 9:38 AM, Makoto Yui wrote:
Justin,
Could you please tell us what
issues exist in Hivemall?
I'd also be interested in knowing (you may use dev@ or private@ as you
see fit) what issues exist with pony mail and release policies :)
Thanks,
Makoto
2019年2月9日(土) 9:51 Justin Mclean :
On 2/9/19 8:50 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
HI,
From what I can see with httpd, the issue is the same(?)
Not quite as I not see any release candidates listed.
ah, well, httpd doesn't do release candidates :p we tag a release, vote
on it, if it fails, you burn the version number and use a new
On 2/9/19 8:37 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
IMO either way it should be ok because
It’s not OK as it doesn’t agree with ASF release policy. You can’t provide
release candidates to the general public and call them releases.
I do see that several ASF projects seem to avoid this issue but I’m
st regards,
Serge Huber.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-161
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:12 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 1/22/19 3:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/01/2019 00:37, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:21 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
-0 (binding) - Th
Just a note from infra that we'll need a decision from the IPMC on this
matter no later than February 7th, preferably before :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 1/13/19 10:14 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hello IPMC and other folks,
We have a big bunch of retired podlings with git repositories on
gi
On 1/22/19 3:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/01/2019 00:37, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:21 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
-0 (binding) - This podling has never completed a suitable podling name
search. It seems that people no longer consider that relevant as it is not
in the Maturity
g>> wrote:
If we can’t name a reason for keeping the data, I’d be inclined
to just
delete. We are not data squirrels.
: o),
Myrle
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 10:15 AM Daniel Gruno
mailto:humbed...@apache.org>> wr
Hello IPMC and other folks,
We have a big bunch of retired podlings with git repositories on
git-wip-us. As we are working on retiring this service, we need to
address what happens with these old project repositories.
The retired podlings we need to address are:
blur, cmda, concerted, corinth
On 12/30/18 6:41 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
I like this template suggestion. It may also be helpful to note that the
Apache ids must be letters and numbers only as some people request special
characters in their ids.
Not to toot my own horn too much, but we also have
https://asf.icla.online/ which
On 12/27/18 6:22 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote:
Sorry, forgot to say that: myrle
You should be good to go now :)
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 3:52 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 12/27/18 3:44 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote:
I'd like to be able to give users from the project I'm mentoring write
acc
On 12/27/18 3:44 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote:
I'd like to be able to give users from the project I'm mentoring write
access.
Best Regards,
Myrle
What's your 8exact) wiki username?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@inc
[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE
DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS]
Hello Apache projects,
I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the
git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming
mon
On 30/10/2018 05.19, Sheng Wu wrote:
Hi Justin
- The podling roster lists both PPMC and committers [1], including people not
on the initial list [2], but I??m unable to find any discussion or votes to why
they were added.
I only see one person not on the initial list, and I found the vo
On 10/18/2018 08:59 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
Finding the project for an ICLA isn't too hard provided the person's name
was mentioned in the mailing list recently. Finding the userid for someone
new, however, does require them to tell us ahead of time.
Mhmm, that's why I made it mandatory on icla.
On 10/16/2018 02:43 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 1:27 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
...
https://icla.live/
...
I love it! With a few comments ;-)
We should be very clear about which information is required or not, I
don't think we really need a phone number for ex
I should note that this only generates a PDF, it doesn't send it - so
test all you like!
On 10/16/2018 01:26 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
So, I took a stab at this, Work-In-Progress and what not:
https://icla.live/
Feedback is most welcome!
With regards,
Daniel.
On 10/16/2018 10:56 AM,
expectations in terms of what happens
next and how much time it might take.
Regards,
Serge…
On 16 Oct 2018, at 10:33, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:29 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
...Thinking out loud here...what if we made a form that better explains
things and checks if
On 10/16/2018 10:25 AM, Serge Huber wrote:
Actually I think there is a lot of documentation and in itself it can be a bit
daunting. Also for the committer request, it would be great if it could be
streamlined by doing some kind of online form but there is the question of the
digital signature
Since the original message must have gotten lost somewhere (I can't find
it in the archives :( ), I am re-sending:
Hi folks,
We are pleased to announce the availability of Apache Pony Mail
(incubating) 0.10. This release brings about more than 150 fixes and
improvements to the Pony Mail projec
:
Nick Kew
Brian McCallister
Daniel Gruno
Jim Jagielski
Is that information perhaps out of date or incorrect? You are also listed as
the champion.
Daniel Gruno
I did champion it (and offer advice/help on occasion), but AIUI the champion&#
There seems to be a bit of confusion here. I am not a mentor for
Annotator, yet I am listed as one. I did champion it (and offer
advice/help on occasion), but AIUI the champion's duties officially stop
once the project has entered incubation and gotten set up. If this is
not the case, then our
The initial set of developers are a lot of newcomers:
* Daniel Gruno
* Chris Thistlethwaite
* Haig Didizian
* Andrew Karetas
* Chandler Claxton
* Luke Stevens
* Mike Andescavage
* Chris Lambertus
==Known Risks ==
There are
well as existing users of the old propietary
service. It is our hope that wecan convert a great deal of these to
contributors and testers for thenew open source
product. ==Core Developers == The initial set of
developers are a lot of newcomers:
* Daniel Gruno *
On 04/16/2018 07:14 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
Is there any ASF infra that would be usable for automatically running
Jekyll on the master branch and pushing the results to the "asf-git"
branch, where they can be served? Maybe CI/build infra, if we have that? It
would provide an experience that is so
On 04/11/2018 09:58 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
3. The mailing list is a bit dated.
Totally true. Pony helps a bit: https://lists.apache.org/
But not all that much.
Spam shouldn't be much of a problem (it isn't on other lists that I have
been part of). Aside from self-inflicted spam like noti
On 02/16/2018 12:39 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know the vote is over but I noticed a couple a minor things you may want to
> fix in the next release:
> - NOTICE has incorrect year
> - jQuery mentioned in LICENSE doesn’t seem to be bundled
Ack, we'll get those fixed up :)
>
> It also
With the existing IPMC votes in the original vote, and no further votes
cast in the general@ vote, the release has passed. Yay :)
I'll start prepping for this.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 02/12/2018 02:08 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> As seen below ( full thread at https://s.apache.org/
Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:01:46 +0100
From: Daniel Gruno
Reply-To: d...@ponymail.incubator.apache.org
To: d...@ponymail.incubator.apache.org
With 5 +1s (of which 4 are binding IPMC votes) and 1 -1, the release
vote has passed
On 02/12/2018 09:42 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I have a little question regarding binary data in ASF repos.
>
> IMO It’s only compiled code that’s not allowed, other binary formats like
> image, pdfs, fonts etc ect are all OK so this should also be OK. I can point
> to a number of rele
On 01/25/2018 07:07 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I got inconsistent results from the same answer out of the same choices on
>>> the same question. It was not clear to me that many of the questions are
>>> “check all that app
On 01/25/2018 06:54 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> "manually placed into www.apache.org/dist" ... I left that box
>> unchecked,
>>> and well... dang. I still got it wrong, it seems.
>>
>> There no question with that answer that I c
t; Issue Tracking:
>
> ECharts currently uses GitHub to track issues. there are more than 7k
> issues. Would like to continue to do so while we discuss migration
> possibilities with the ASF Infra committee.
>
> URL:
>
> Currently the website url is
> https://ecom
On 12/06/2017 06:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 2017-12-06 18:14 GMT+01:00 Daniel Gruno :
>> On 12/06/2017 06:10 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>> As explained in the original GIT at ASF threads many years ago: you cannot
>>> easily get rid of a branch at ASF.
>>&g
On 12/06/2017 06:10 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> As explained in the original GIT at ASF threads many years ago: you cannot
> easily get rid of a branch at ASF.
> Even if we force-push a delete it will _not_ get propagated downstream and
> would cause clashes if a release needs to be re-rolled.
Mo
On 03/24/2017 11:18 PM, Stack wrote:
> I am having trouble finding where to edit to fix a podling's whimsey view?
> Pointers appreciated.
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
TL;DR: https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/ ;)
With regards,
Daniel
--
+1 (binding), best of luck!!
On 03/22/2017 03:11 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote:
> Greetings Incubator,
>
> I propose that we graduate Apache Fineract from the Incubator. The
> full text of the proposal is below.
>
> This is a restarted VOTE thread to correct an error in the resolution
> from the origi
On 03/06/2017 04:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Everyone,
> I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflows on Apache
> projects.
>
> In GH, it is possible to comment on commits and pull requests. Are those
> captured by infra@ and replicated somewhere, or is this "lost data" (I
> su
On 03/03/2017 05:32 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Where can I find the archives for project private lists nowadays? Things
> seem to have changed a bit regarding archives, so I have looked in the
> mod_mbox archives (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/) and in the
> Pony Mail archives (https://li
On 12/04/2016 07:20 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>> Hi Roman,
>>
>> The affiliation for the proposed PMC members is:
>>
>> * Tyler Akidau : Google
>> * Davor Bonaci : Google
>> * Robert Bradshaw : Google
>> * Ben Chambers : Google
>>
On 11/28/2016 04:06 PM, 吴志华(天施) wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
For binding +1s, we generally require a name we can compare with our
Apache Phonebook to make sure you are on the IPMC. I was unable to find
you as a committer, could you please tell me your apache ID?
With regards,
Daniel.
> ---
noveffa.pagano
> https://www.miracl.com
> 81 Rivington Street
> London UK, EC2A 3AY
> Registered in England and Wales 7017635
>
>
> On 27 November 2016 at 15:47, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 11/27/2016 04:35 PM, Genoveffa Pagano wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I am
On 11/27/2016 04:35 PM, Genoveffa Pagano wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to gather some data on the most successful Apache projects,
> including incubating projects, in the past couple of years.
> With successful, I mean the ones with most development from diverse
> developers and companies, when app
What we are concerned with is whether the name clashes with other
projects or have other potential branding issues. Whether it means
something funny in $language, who cares... :)
I think Weex is just fine. Let's move on.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 11/22/2016 02:44 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> Not lon
On 11/09/2016 01:00 AM, Christopher wrote:
> Sorry if these questions have already been answered, but I'm still a bit
> confused, so if anybody can answer I'd be grateful.
>
> Why is GA for podlings being considered before GA for TLPs? Or, is GitHub
> already generally available to TLPs, and I mis
On 11/09/2016 12:58 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhni
On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/07/
:14PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I was l
On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I was looking at Sn
I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
of tickets and email, as well
On 09/25/2016 06:22 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> ...ballpark costs, bandwidth, machines needed and so forth, and the cliff
>> notes are as follows...
>
> Thanks very much for this - it is usef
Hi folks,
I've been going over the requirements for NetBeans infrastructure, it's
ballpark costs, bandwidth, machines needed and so forth, and the cliff
notes are as follows:
- 40-50TB/month in traffic required (mostly downloads+plugins)
- 8-13 machines/VMS are required
- Ballpark hardware costs
t
> been addressed so far and would prevent us from voting on this
> proposal to chime in.
>
> Based on the discussions in this thread we have added Mark Struberg
> and Jim Jagielski to the proposal as mentors. Daniel Gruno mentioned
> the need for someone from ASF infra as a ment
On 09/14/2016 03:51 PM, Wade Chandler wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 14, 2016, at 09:38, Wade Chandler wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 14, 2016, at 09:28, Daniel Gruno >> <mailto:humbed...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/14/2016 03:17 PM,
.
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Raphael Bircher
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> They have also a fairly big forum at http://forums.netbeans.org/ wich
>> is not listed on the proposal
>>
>> Regards Raphael
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:2
On 09/13/2016 11:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> What is the expected impact on infrastructure here?...
>
> I'll let Geertjan or someone else who's familiar with the existing
> setups c
What is the expected impact on infrastructure here? I see a lot of
mentions of moving existing infrastructure to the ASF, I see very little
about what it really entails and how large it is.
For instance, what is plugins.netbeans.org and what's the setup there like?
With regards,
Daniel.
On 09/13
Obviously a binding +1 from me :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 08/08/2016 09:41 PM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the Apache
> Annotator proposal:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal
>
> From what our Champion t
On 08/08/2016 10:03 AM, Christopher wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:34 AM Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
>> Another possible option would be to move it to our CMS.
>>
>> That would bring us SVN for the people who prefer vi, but also a graphical
>> UI for editing.
>> And it would make people make fami
Binding +1s:
- Daniel Gruno
- Josh Elser
- John D Ament
- Justin McClean
- Sergio Fernández
Non-binding +1s: None
0s: None
-1s: None
With 5 binding +1s and no -1s, the vote has passed.
I will prepare the release and announcement once my break day is over :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 07/17
ocker - there, I said it :p
There is some way to finagle your way to open a port in the container
and bind it to a port on your local machine, but I forget how, sorry.
If I figure it out, I'll put it in the docs for next release (or someone
else could do it, patches welcome :) ).
>
I should note that this vote will run for 72 hours.
Also, it currently carries one binding IPMC vote (me).
With regards,
Daniel.
On 07/17/2016 11:08 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hello IPMC and lurkers,
> This is a vote to release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9.RC2 as 0.9.
>
>
Hello IPMC and lurkers,
This is a vote to release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9.RC2 as 0.9.
Podling vote thread is at:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9fd77b14753bbde462bea06fc2e1c03d5cf5a89cea2fabd6751d805a@%3Cdev.ponymail.apache.org%3E
The release artefact can be found at:
https://dist
+1 (binding) also.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 07/09/2016 10:08 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 18:16 -0600, Jan van Doorn wrote:
>
>> I don't think the association with ATS would hold us back, but I do think it
>> could give prospective users of Traffic Control the impression that it
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
