Hi Niclas,
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Monday 23 July 2007 03:14, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> On 7/22/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Last Incubating release - the com.sun.jini classes are the wrappers to
>>> the org.apache.river classes.
>> At that point (I don't see a necessity fo
Jim Hurley wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> On 7/23/07, Jim Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Jul 22, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
>>> > IMHO, unless there are trademark or licensing issues involved,
>>> :
>>>
>>> I don't believe there are issues
. For example would
it be acceptable to create a compatibility layer and thus, for at least
this first release, have both com.sun and org.apache namespaces present
in our codebase and release? This would allow our users some time to
transition smoothly to the new package namespace.
Many thanks,
Dan
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>>
>> it's a little different. Jini is an old and I would say "fundamental
>> technology" for service infrastructure in the java platform, very
>> different from today's "SOA".
>>
>> I'll let someone else argue my
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
> Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as "River".
> You may be familiar with this project as it has been discussed under
> other names, including Braintree and Jini. I've actually lost
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2006, at 10:46 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>> It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
>> Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as "River".
>> You may be familiar with this project as it has been discussed under
>>
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 8/15/06, Bob Scheifler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's important to note that the JDP is not a process for
*developing* standards, but for *approving* them. The JDP is
a backend decision process, not a frontend development process.
Most of the specifications that ha
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 19:19, Leo Simons wrote:
What I'm missing is an idea of the interaction between jini.org and this
proposed new apache project, and an idea of the interaction between the JCP
process and the apache project. Eg is the apache project a (reference?)
i
