Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.9.0

2017-12-19 Thread Chris Riccomini
ression that we were still staging the release. Are you saying I should move the rc8 artifacts over to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/airflow/ now, before the IPMC has +1'd the release? On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:35 AM, sebb wrote: > On 18 December 2017 at 20:32, C

[VOTE] Release Airflow 1.9.0

2017-12-18 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hello Incubator PMC’ers, The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to release Apache Airflow 1.9.0 (incubating) based on 1.9.0 Release Candidate 8. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this incubator release. Airflow is a platform to program

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating)

2017-05-09 Thread Chris Riccomini
NOTE: Jakob Homan is an IPMC member, and +1'd the release during the Airflow community vote. Thanks! On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Chris Riccomini wrote: > Hey all, > > The vote has passed after 72+ hours. > > There were two +1 votes: > > Josh Elser, John D. Am

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating)

2017-05-09 Thread Chris Riccomini
Just to close the loop, we had a +1 during the Airflow community vote from Jakob Homan, who is an IPMC member: https://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jghoman I'm going to proceed with the release. On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Chris Riccomini wrote: > > Were there mentor

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating)

2017-05-09 Thread Chris Riccomini
f > having 3 IPMC +1 votes [1]. > > Were there mentor +1 votes on the dev@ vote thread that can be carried > over? > > -Taylor > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases > > > > > On May 9, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Chris Riccomin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating)

2017-05-09 Thread Chris Riccomini
Jakob Homan already +1'd the release as part of the Airflow community vote. Does that count towards the IPMC vote, or does he have to +1 it again? On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Chris Riccomini wrote: > Argh, forgot that we need three votes for incubator release. Can someone > els

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating)

2017-05-09 Thread Chris Riccomini
in setup.cfg, its already in > setup.py so may have been a miss) > > It would be great to see a binary distribution in the next vote to see how > that may work, its not clear how to build it from this. Likewise, don't > hesitate to clean up your old release artifacts, I down

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating)

2017-05-09 Thread Chris Riccomini
py so may have been a miss) > > It would be great to see a binary distribution in the next vote to see how > that may work, its not clear how to build it from this. Likewise, don't > hesitate to clean up your old release artifacts, I downloaded the wrong > artifact at first. &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating)

2017-05-05 Thread Chris Riccomini
Sigh, that was meant to be signed: Cheers, Chris On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Chris Riccomini wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC’ers, > > The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to > release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating) based on 1.8.1 Release Candidate

[VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating)

2017-05-05 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hello Incubator PMC’ers, The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating) based on 1.8.1 Release Candidate 2. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this incubator release. If the vote is successful we will

Airflow voting on release artifacts

2017-04-24 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hey all, We've had a question arise in the Airflow project. We're currently cutting release candidates (RCs), and voting on those. These RCs contain an artifact with the suffix -rc0, -rc1, etc. The problem with this is that the final RC that passes the vote still has an -rcX in its version number.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.0 (incubating)

2017-03-16 Thread Chris Riccomini
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Bolke de Bruin wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC’ers, > > The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to > release Apache Airflow 1.8.0 (incubating) based on 1.8.0 Release Candidate > 5. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC mem

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.0 (incubating)

2017-02-22 Thread Chris Riccomini
+1 non-binding On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Bolke de Bruin wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC’ers, > > The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to > release Apache Airflow 1.8.0 (incubating) based on 1.8.0 Release Candidate > 4. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC memb

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-131) airflow installation issue

2016-09-09 Thread Chris Riccomini (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15477293#comment-15477293 ] Chris Riccomini commented on INCUBATOR-131: --- You've opened an INCUB

Airflow podling name search

2016-07-25 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hey all, Could someone please have a look at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-110 Has been open for 2 weeks with no activity. Thanks! Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apac

Re: In-flight release in Incubator

2016-05-06 Thread Chris Riccomini
bating). > > > > The fact that quality/bugs/features and Apache IP checking are > essentially > > orthogonal issues is often not obvious to incoming projects. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Shane Curcuru > wrote: > > > >>

In-flight release in Incubator

2016-05-05 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hey all, Airflow was in the middle of a release prior to joining Apache Incubator, and had several RCs out. The release has already been delayed by several weeks due to bugs we've discovered. We don't want to tie this release to the full-blown Apache release cycle, since we're not yet ready to tic

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-31 Thread Chris Riccomini
Soiland-Reyes Arthur Wiedmer Chris Riccomini Maxime Beauchemin Stian Soiland-Reyes We'll work with the mentors to get the project bootstrapped. Thanks! Chris

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-24 Thread Chris Riccomini
[[ > https://github.com/maxcountryman/flask-bcrypt/blob/master/LICENSE|flask-bcrypt > (BSD)]] > * [[https://github.com/testing-cabal/mock/blob/master/LICENSE.txt|mock > (BSD)]] > * [[https://github.com/mtth/hdfs/blob/master/LICENSE|hdfs (MIT)]] > > == Cryptography == > > N

Re: [PROPOSAL] : Airflow

2016-03-19 Thread Chris Riccomini
rious because there where some people with 20+ > commits not in the initial committers list. Was not looking for a change, > more that there had been some thought behind this exclusion and how the > project intended to start developing that community > > -Jake > > On Thu, Mar 1

Re: [PROPOSAL] : Airflow

2016-03-19 Thread Chris Riccomini
> The proposal has the incubator listed as the sponsor and a quick check shows Chris Riccomini is not on the IPMC or a member currently, details on roles are available at [1]. I was under the impression that I could sponsor because I am an officer: "A candidate project shall be sponsor

Re: Wiki access

2014-07-01 Thread Chris Riccomini
iki.apache.org/samza/ContributorsGroup > > -Jake > > > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Chris Riccomini > wrote: > > > Hey Nick, > > > > I am a Samza committer with edit access to this wiki. How can I add > Martin? > > > > Cheers, > > Chris

Re: Wiki access

2014-07-01 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hey Nick, I am a Samza committer with edit access to this wiki. How can I add Martin? Cheers, Chris On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Martin Kleppmann wrote: > >> Thanks! Could you please also give me write access on the Samza wiki ( >> https://wiki.apac

Re: Hoya Proposal

2014-01-21 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hey Guys, I'd like to +1 non-binding Hoya (or whatever you want to call it). It's going to be really useful for the YARN ecosystem to have a project like this out there, and it makes a lot of sense to put it in Apache. Hopefully we can move past the naming stuff, and get the project in. Cheers,

Re: Welcome to the Incubator, Samza community!

2013-08-15 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hey All, Thanks for the info! Great to be here. Cheers, Chris On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Good catch Daniel > > Samza community, be aware that the incubator is attempting to be more > responsive to the occasional blocker on a podlings progress. You are the > first of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Samza Proposal

2013-07-31 Thread Chris Riccomini
M > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Alex Karasulu > > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > I would love to see the "documents comparing and contrasting Samza with > > > MUPD8 and Storm." > > > > > > &

Re: [PROPOSAL] Samza Proposal

2013-07-26 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hey Marvin, I think we pretty much agree with everything you've said. :) We're definitely sensitive to the discuss-in-person issue. We'll pay attention to it, and try to move conversation to the list when we see it happening. The same holds true for the risk assessment comment. We're sensitive to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Samza Proposal

2013-07-23 Thread Chris Riccomini
g the Apache meritocracy model. > > Since Samza was initially developed in late 2011, we have had fast > adoption > > and contributions by multiple teams at LinkedIn. We plan to continue > > support for new contributors and work with those who contribute > > significan