at maginatics dot com
> * Andrew Phillips, aphillips at qrmedia dot com
> * Matt Stephenson, mattstep at mattstep dot net
> * Everett Toews, everett dot toews at rackspace dot com
> * Becca Wood, silkysun at silkysun dot net
>
> == Affiliations ==
>
> * Ignasi Barrera, Abiquo
> * Andrew Bayer, Cloudera
> * Ioannis Canellos, Red Hat
> * Adrian Cole, Netflix
> * Andrew Gaul, Maginatics
> * Matt Stephenson, Google
> * Everett Toews, Rackspace
>
> == Sponsors ==
> === Champion ===
>
> * Brian McCallister, Apache Software Foundation
>
> === Mentors ===
>
> * Brian McCallister, Apache Software Foundation
> * Tom White, Apache Software Foundation
> * Henning Schmiedehausen, Apache Software Foundation
> * David Nalley, Apache Software Foundation
> * Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Apache Software Foundation
> * Mohammad Nour El-Din, Apache Software Foundation
> * Olivier Lamy, Apache Software Foundation
> * Tomaz Muraus, Apache Software Foundation
> * Suresh Marru, Apache Software Foundation
> * Carlos Sanchez, Apache Software Foundation
>
> === Sponsoring Entity ===
>
> The jclouds contributors and community request sponsorship from the
> Incubator.
>
>
I contributed some code back in the day, so happy to help too.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> I'm very interested as well.
>
> I'm also volunteer to be mentor on the project.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 04/16/2013 09:19 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2
lt; 2.5, a JSON Parser such as SimpleJSON is required.
>
> Cryptography
>
> Uses standard Python APIs for SSL/HTTPS.
>
> Required Resources
>
> Mailing lists
>
> * libcloud-dev
> * libcloud-commits
> * libcloud-private
&
+1 and I'm interested, in case you need a mentor
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> +1...
>
> There has been few new, accepted proposals lately...
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose incubating the existing Libcloud p
+1 the idea is very interesting
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> +1...
>
> There has been few new, accepted proposals lately...
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose incubating the existing Libcloud project to
>> jo
I didn't have a chance to talk about this with Shane but the idea in
the end is to make the repository agnostic on how things are stored
and how the client uses them.
Right now is a simple directory, but could be a database with a web
front end or anything like that.
It shouldn't matter how NMaven
need the artifact and the artifact.asc (gpg signature) and
> > artifact.md5 to be in the staging area. The sha1 is not needed.
> >
> > This should be part of the release process that's documented...
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
&g
On 3/16/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> 1. central repo must be self contained, all artifacts in central
> repository must have dependencies already in central, only exception
> is if license doesn't allow redistribution but in that ca
Let's be clear, the central repo can host apache incubating artifacts,
it's not its business, it's an ASF business.
Now, only the ASF can publish under org.apache groupId through the
repos setup in the ASF boxes that are automatically setup
But if John Doe decides to publish an incubator artifac
On 3/15/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, both cases appear to be the same because in case #1, unless the
user is not part of collaborative effort, someone else could have added the
repository to the pom.xml for the project. Apparently, Maven doesn't
require the user to au
some Maven/repository details that I don't think were clear in previous threads:
1. central repo must be self contained, all artifacts in central
repository must have dependencies already in central, only exception
is if license doesn't allow redistribution but in that case the pom
must be there
11 matches
Mail list logo