I have no had enough time to spend as the livy and spot mentor. I would like to
step down at this time.
Brock
Brock Noland | Chief Architect
phData
E : br...@phdata.io
( https://www.phdata.io/ )
phData Voted 2019 Best Places to Work (
https://phdatawebinar.com/best-places-to-work-2019
Thanks!
[x] +1 Approve the release
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Bharath Vissapragada
wrote:
> Impala 2.10.0 release candidate 2 has passed a PPMC vote; this email is a
> call for an IPMC vote.
>
> The PPMC voting thread is at:
>
> <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/788430a3ee2d9599b75ce235e0ab7
+1
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 as well.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Aug 23, 2017, 17:04, at 17:04, Marcelo Vanzin
> wrote:
> >Just echoing my +1 from the Livy list.
> >
> >On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Jerry Shao wrote:
> >> Hello Incubator PMC’ers,
> >>
>
gt; comments.
> > >
> > > = Initial Source =
> > >
> > > The initial source code for Livy is hosted at
> > > https://github.com/cloudera/livy
> > >
> > > = Source and In
* u...@livy.incubator.apache.org (User questions)
> * comm...@livy.incubator.apache.org (subscribers shouldn’t be able
> to post)
> * iss...@livy.incubator.apache.org (subscribers shouldn’t be able
> to post)
>
> == Git Repository ==
>
> git://git.apache.or
Can you give brocknoland edit access to the wiki?
+1 (binding)
On Thursday, December 3, 2015, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether
> Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted
> below and is available on the wiki as well.
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/in
.", I wrote this line:
>
> "Nobody is forcing anything."
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>
>> Brock, I can assure you that's not Greg's style so I doubt you have
>> anything to worry about.
>>
>>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> Personally, I am saying RTC is destructive, and am willing to give every
> podling that message.
Delivering that message by informing podlings of your experience is
completely acceptable. However, if anyone attempts to force a podling
from
> > > and summarized here:
> > >
> > > * '''Twitter Bootstrap''': Apache 2.0
> > > * '''d3''': BSD 3-clause
> > > * '''epoch JS library''': MIT
>
t; > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on that proposal, which is on the wiki at
> > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ImpalaProposal, and which I've
> > > pasted
> > > > > below.
> > > &
Same here. Happy to see this come to the ASF!
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> Awesome! Glad to see this coming to the ASF :-)
>
> ++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software a
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Not sure how to totally grok the below... It seems to
> imply, logically, that we cannot require either CTR or RTC.
> So what other method is there? Certainly we need both a
> Review and a Commit and one must be done before the other,
> right
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> IMO, I trust our PMCs and PPMCs to know whether RTC or CTR, or some
> combination of both, is better suited to their community and
> their project. Both processes can work great, and both can be
> perfect disasters.
+1. I don't think it's b
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
>
>> In the mean time, if you take a look at the .travis.yml file, you can see
>> the preparation steps used to run CI jobs. That's what I usually point
>> people at instead of maintaining it i
[x] +1 Release this as Apache Parquet Format 2.3.0
verified sigs, hashes, no jars, and inspected tarball.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose RC2 to be released as official Apache Parquet 2.3.0 release.
>
> A similar vote has passed in the podling, with
> The vote is open for 72 hours, or until the necessary number of votes (3
> +1)
> is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.0.0 incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Forwarding 1 vote from an IPMC member on the PPMC vote:
> +1
+1
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:00 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 1:58:34 PM Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful
> and
> > positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
> >
> > Vote will be open f
rithm providers are used to support SSL,
> >SSH/SFTP, and the encryption and decryption of sensitive properties.
> >In the event that it becomes necessary we will engage with appropriate
> >Apache members to ensure we file any necessary paperwork or clarified
> >any cryptograph
om/blog/2013/10/parquet-at-salesforce-com/).
> >
> > === Inexperience with Open Source ===
> >
> > Parquet has existed as a healthy open source for one year. During that
> > time, we have curated an open-source community successfully, attracting
> > over 40 contribut
Yes, I think the 500MB issue was because we moved the .tar.gz files the
build downloads to a directory called "thirdparty" as opposed to "target".
I made this change because downloading those files after a clean took a
very long time for yokels like myself.
Some of the issues would be fixed by ch
uested features and bug-fixes towards the next dot release.
> > >
> > > == Current Status ==
> > > === Meritocracy ===
> > >
> > > Intent of the proposal is to build a diverse community of developers
> > around
> > > Sentry. Sentry started
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 11/6/12 10:57 AM, "Adam Berry" wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
>>submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubato
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> I'm sorry, I probably miss understood the intention here.
Made sense to me as a response to ""Not sure about the entry criteria
for the GIT experiment right now, but I think it should be pretty
stable - lets ask infra?"
Brock
>
> Jarce
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>> This seems like it might be more at home at apache-extras.
>
> That may ultimately be its fate, but building a community around these
> tools is worthy of an attempt. This also shares m
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> --
> Olivier
> Le 20 juil. 2012 18:43, "Aaron McCurry" a écrit :
>
> > I would like to call a vote for accepting Blur for incubation in the
> > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below.
> >
>
for management of the projects within the scope of
> >responsibility of the Apache Flume Project; and be it further
> >
> >RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> >hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> >Apach
s into a single
> !MapReduce job.
> * Performance, usability, and robustness improvements.
> * Improving diagnostic reporting and debugging for individual !MapReduce
> jobs.
> * Providing a centralized place for contributed extensions and
> domain-specific applications.
&g
The Apache MRUnit team is pleased to announce the release of MRUnit
0.9.0-incubating from the Apache Incubator.
This is the fourth release of Apache MRUnit, a Java library that helps
developers unit test Apache Hadoop map reduce jobs.
The release is available here:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/close
re for file mrunit-0.9.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> gpg: Signature made Wed Apr 18 13:14:43 2012 PDT using RSA key ID 8E991CC5
> gpg: Good signature from "Brock Noland (CODE SIGNING KEY) "
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is n
Patrick,
I think we should resolve this, but I am wondering s this a strict
requirement for this release? In looking for the correct entry for
JUnit I noticed hadoop-1.0.2 distributes the JUnit jar and nothing is
mentioned in the NOTICE.txt.
Brock
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Brock Noland
e text "How should so-called "Weak Copyleft"
> Licenses be handled?", including "Software under the following
> licenses may be included in binary form within an Apache product if
> the inclusion is appropriately labeled".
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292&version=12316360
*** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
Note that we are voting upon t
> Patrick
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Brock Noland wrote:
>> Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is
>>
>> +1 3 Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>> -1 0
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jim Don
Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is
+1 3 Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
-1 0
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jim Donofrio wrote:
> Brock,
>
> I guess you can email this up to general@incubator.apache.org now, right?
>
>
> O
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating/
>
> There's a NOTICE.txt and NOTICE-src.txt at the top level.
>
> IMO the primary NOTICE file should be for the source.
>
So there would
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292&version=12316360
*** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
Note that we are voting upon t
bprn5h2vl
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Brock Noland wrote:
>> I didn't see Tom's vote? Sometimes emails don't show up in my box so
>> I checked here as well and cannot find it?
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/
Feb 29, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> me/tom/chris is not sufficient? Or did I miss something?
>
> Patrick
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
>> Great! Now we only need one more +1 from an IPMC member. Added
>> general to the email chain.
vl
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Brock Noland wrote:
>> I didn't see Tom's vote? Sometimes emails don't show up in my box so
>> I checked here as well and cannot find it?
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_
7-151-253-178:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.1] mattmann%
> $HOME/bin/verify_gpg_sigs
> Verifying Signature for file mrunit-0.8.1-incubating-dist.tar.gz.asc
> gpg: Signature made Fri Feb 17 12:10:27 2012 PST using RSA key ID 8E991CC5
> gpg: Good signature from "Brock Noland (CODE SIGNING KEY) "
&g
to me.
>
> Note: the archive includes a mrunit jar file (the only jar file)
> 'mrunit-0.8.1-incubating-hadoop100.jar'. Might be confusing for
> people.
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
>> Hi,
Hi,
Just a ping to remind people to vote.
Brock
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Karthik K wrote:
> classifier names look good. +1 (non-binding :) )
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
>
>> This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, ver
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.1-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292&version=12319881
*** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
Note that we are voting upon t
his? Typically you want to have a src only artifact,
>> and one or more artifacts containing "convenience binaries".
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
>>> This is an incubator rel
jar file (the only jar file), did
> you intend to do this? Typically you want to have a src only artifact,
> and one or more artifacts containing "convenience binaries".
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
>&g
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version
0.8.1-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292&version=12319881
*** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
Note that we are voting upon t
I missed antelders +1 vote and only noticed this today via this link:
http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-MRUnit-version-0.8.0-incubating-td33113645.html
As such, the vote passes with:
4 +1 Patrick Hunt, Chrs M, antelder, Brock Noland
0 -1
Patrick Hunt, Chrs M, antelder are all members
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly:
Great! We only need one more +1 from an IPMC member. Is there a list
somewhere? I bothered Tom White last time so I'd prefer to bother
someone else.
Cheers,
Brock
-
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292&version=12316359
*** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
Note that we are voting upon t
The release vote has passed the PPMC:
+1 from Brock Noland, Patrick Hunt, Eric Sammer, Chris Mattmann (count
= 4)
-1 (count = 0)
Patrick and Chris are on the IPMC, so we need one more IPMC +1 VOTE to release.
Cheers,
Brock
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
> This is
This is the first incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version
0.5.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292&version=12316328
*** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
Note that we are voting
53 matches
Mail list logo
