+1 - glad to see Druid finally (hopefully) landing here!
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:57 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen <
henn...@schmiedehausen.org> wrote:
> Woot!
>
> +1 for druid incubation.
>
> -h
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to o
+1 !
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Cool.
>
> +1
>
> > On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> >
> > Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache
> > RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable, scalable, distributed, easy to
> use
> > mess
+1 from me!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:23 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Obviously a binding +1 from me :)
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> On 08/08/2016 09:41 PM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the
> Apache Annotator proposal:
>
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Benjamin Young
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'd very much like to un-log-jam the Annotator Proposal which I submitted
> back in late May-hence the new thread. ;)
>
> AFAIK, we only need one more Mentor to get things rolling. Two of our
> committers are from the Apache Couc
And a belated +1, not that it needs the extra vote, but jclouds functions
great!
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
> > Reminder - it'd be great to get more eyes and make sure we're not missing
> > anything for graduation.
Aurora is aimed at long-running stateless services (like app servers)?
-Brian
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Dave Lester wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We're pleased to share a draft ASF incubation proposal for Aurora, a
> service scheduler used to schedule jobs onto Apache Mesos that we've
> developed
+1
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
> (incubating)
> version 0.11.0. This will be the third incubator release for Mesos in
> Apache
>
> .
>
> The candidate for Mesos 0.11.0-incubating release is available at:
>
git and requests the following
> allocation on the Apache git server:
>
> git://git.apache.org/incubator-jclouds.git
>
> === Issue Tracking ===
>
> jclouds currently uses GitHub for issue tracking. The intent is to request
> an allocation for Jira upon acceptance into the Incubator
BrianMcCallister
Thanks!
-Brian
+1
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
> (incubating) version 0.10.0. This will be the second incubator release for
> Mesos in Apache.
>
> The candidate for Mesos 0.10.0-incubating release is available at:
>
+1 swept for licensing and general organization of everything :-)
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> +1
>
> Tested it on Mac OS X, seems to work fine.
>
> Matei
>
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
I don't remember seeing anything about a CloudStack project, is there
something I missed?
http://www.citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=2323072
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Fo
The proposal looks fine, but the name collides with http://howl.ow2.org/
-Brian
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> I would like to propose Howl as an Apache Incubator project. Howl is a
> table and storage management service for data created using Apache Hadoop.
> The proposa
* mesos-user
>
>
>
> == Subversion Directory ==
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos
>
>
>
> == Issue Tracking ==
>
> JIRA Mesos (MESOS)
>
>
>
> == Other Resources ==
>
> The
tions)
> * mesos-dev
> * mesos-commits
> * mesos-user
>
>
>
> == Subversion Directory ==
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos
>
>
>
> == Issue Tracking ==
>
> JIRA Mesos (MESOS)
>
>
>
> == Other Resources ==
>
> The exist
+1
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> +1 (binding )
>
> sent from my Android phone
>
> Am 06.05.2010 07:57 schrieb "Gurkan Erdogdu" :
>
> +1
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Simone Gianni
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, Ma
+1 (slightly late, but I have a great excuse!)
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Good luck.
>
> --kevan
>
> On Jan 28, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our
>> active
Big +1
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> FYI, the Shindig community has successfully voted for graduation [1].
> If no objection on the charter or other, I will start a formal
> acceptance vote soon.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vincent
>
> [1] http://shindig-dev.markmail
+1
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> As you know, we've been preparing our proposal to submit Traffic Server to
> the Incubator for a few weeks now. With the help from our champion (thanks
> Doug!), and the entire Incubator community, it's my pleasure to subm
What ever happened to Etch?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> I'd like to see some plan on dealing with the fork/community stuff. We
> *know* it is a problem, and I'd like to see how this is being
> addressed in the proposal. In my opinion that is the crux to this
> proposal. Just going Apache is no
t than any apache project.
-Brian
>
> Martijn
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
>> I consider this to be a high-risk project, and agree with Martjin's
>> concerns, but do not consider this a bar to entering incubation. The
>> *reason*
se the project, but
> rather to demonstrate the commitment to open source by divorcing the trunk
> from any one corporation and pursuing further integration with other Apache
> projects.
>
> = Required Resources =
> == Mailing lists ==
>
> Once the project is approved,
I am expecting to be a mentor.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
> If you need one more, you can count me in.
>
> Cheers,
> Matthieu
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:38 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
> wrote:
>
>> Ian Holsman wrote:
>> > I'll be a mentor. do we need 2 or 3?
>>
>> That
+1
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Incubator General List, dear IPMC,
>
> thank you all for your comments on whether CouchDB should graduate
> from the Incubator to a top level project. I think we have your support.
> On behalf of the Apache CouchDB P
Sweet, I'll +1 it and probably use it :-)
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator.
>
> Enterprise Social Messaging Experiment (ESME) is a secure and highly
> scalable microsharing and micromessagin
Good catch, thank you!
I just added us to the third group (ie, the March group). We'll need to be
good incubatorlings and probably do our "first three months" of reporting a
bit late :-)
-Brian
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Just trying to help wit
FWIW, I quite like both git and mercurial, both give me a better workflow
than subversion for a lot of things I work on. Offline commits, local
branches, and sane merging are *huge*. The approach to distributed repos is
also very nice for folks who do want to maintain a fork elsewhere (forking
isn'
+1
On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages
> of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we
> proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors.
> Now it is time
+1
-Brian
On Thu, Feb 7, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Mark Slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the
> > > Wiki:
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal
>
> +1
>
+1 -- I am very excited to see this and think it will be good for CouchDB.
-Brian
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The original source for this proposal can be found at
>
> http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal
>
> and a curren
I've filed infra tickets for Shindig tuff to be set up :-)
On Dec 3, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
+1: 25
0: 1
-1: 0
Looks like it passed! Woo hoo!
On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindi
+1: 25
0: 1
-1: 0
Looks like it passed! Woo hoo!
On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
= Abstract =
Shindig will deve
+1 from me as well :-)
On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop a container and ba
per and user mailing lists
A subversion repository
A JIRA issue tracker
= Initial Committers =
Andy Smith (Google)
Brian McCallister (Ning)
Brian Stoler(Google)
Cassie Doll (Google)
Dan Bentley (Google)
Dan Farino (MySpa
- Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 1:03:49 PM
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container
Shindig Proposal
--
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop the container and b
I'll update the proposal for changes from the discussion thus far and
bing it to a vote ASAP.
Meanwhile, initial (and gnarly, following bad is good for open
source ;-) seeder code:
http://people.apache.org/~brianm/shindig.tgz
-Brian
On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Brian McCallister
On Nov 9, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
Shindig Proposal
A big +1, and I'd happily be a mentor.
Thank you! We'll take you up on that :-)
-Brian
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez - http://
Wow, really happy at the positive response.
I'm on my way to ATL in the morning, and am halfway healthy again, so
will try to pull out some code during hackathon.
-Brian
On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
Shindig Proposal
--
= Abstract =
Shindig will develo
On Nov 9, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Can we see a code dump of the stuff you'll be donating?
As soon as possible :-) I am home with a nasty fever today so...
blech. We should have the ning-specific stuff gutted out by ApacheCon
at least!
-Brian
ser mailing lists
A subversion repository
A JIRA issue tracker
= Initial Committers =
Thomas Baker<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tim Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martin
+1
-Brian
On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad
interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build
a diverse developer community.
ht
+1 -- I'd offer to help as much as I can, but I know how little that
is right now :-(
Definitely support (and will probably use at least ;-)
-Brian
On Sep 18, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
Hi,
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
proposal
On Sep 17, 2007, at 5:57 AM, David L Kaminsky wrote:
Tomcat
-
We're open to suggestions regarding the order in which we add
bindings to
APIs, and doing such bindings isn't terribly hard. If Tomcat is
particularly critical as an early demonstration, we can add that to
the
propo
+1
-Brian
On Jun 1, 2007, at 2:15 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
'retired' status.
Earlier this year the Heraldry project was reorganized in order to
make another attempt at incubating an OpenID project. Unfortunately,
the recon
+1 Good folks, good community, good code!
-Brian
On May 8, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Dear Incubator,
The OpenJPA podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider
its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending
the attached draft board resolution.
I think wadi withdrew from incubation. It seems alive here: http://
wadi.codehaus.org/
?
-Brian
On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:09 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I cross-referenced http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
against http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ and noticed that the
Wadi
On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:58 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
If someone can step up to help OpenJPA I will trade off :-)
I haven't been a fantastic mentor for OpenJPA, anyway :-(
(Not trying to ditch OpenJPA, just trying to open up options :-)
-
If someone can step up to help OpenJPA I will trade off :-)
I haven't been a fantastic mentor for OpenJPA, anyway :-(
-Brian
On Apr 10, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I am informed that QPid has two Mentors. Would someone please
volunteer to
act as a third? QPid is an technology
Vote Passes:
+1: [ brianm, rooneg, yoavs, jim, clr ]
-1: []
-Brian
On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
recorded and I would like to move forward with
On Feb 16, 2007, at 2:42 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Brian,
On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
-1 (NOT binding)
The document still contains remnants of its TEMPLATE origin
search for "TEMPLATE"
De
On Feb 16, 2007, at 2:42 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Does the page title still show up in the browser as "XYZ Codebase
Intellectual Property (IP) Clearance Status"? You didn't edit this
line in the patch below.
Updated that line as well now :-)
-Brian
On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
search for "if applicable"
Using the search available here ( http://www.uspto.gov/main/
trademarks.htm ) I found nothing which looks infringing. There are
a number of wombat trademarks around, but the only one related to
s
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
-1 (NOT binding)
The document still contains remnants of its TEMPLATE origin
search for "TEMPLATE"
Deleted this section, thank you
search for "if applicable"
Using the search available here ( http://www.uspto.gov/main/
trademarks.htm )
On Feb 14, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is a lazy-consensus approval vote.
Huh? These types of things should require activing
voting, not lazy-consensus. Otherwise the Incubator
is worthless.
I am just quoting from the IP Clearance docs:
Fourth paragraph (if you count the tex
+1 From me :-)
-Brian
On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
recorded and I would like to move forward with the import.
Code grants and CLA's have
The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
recorded and I would like to move forward with the import.
Code grants and CLA's have been recorded from each person who has
contributed code.
This is a lazy-consensus a
+1 and about time :-)
-Brian
On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:07 AM, Dave wrote:
OK, let's try this again.
The Roller community believes that Roller is ready for graduation, as
evidenced by this vote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-roller-dev/
200702.mbox/browser
We would like to
+1
-Brian
On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Hi all,
This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf
database server project at apache. The entire proposal text is
included below. There is only one change from the one posted to the
[proposal] thread -- we will
+1
-Brian
On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
The Felix community feels that we are ready for graduation, as
indicated by the following community vote to request graduation:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-felix-dev/
200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We wo
Vote passes!
I'll forward the resolution to the board :-)
+1: [
Henri Yandell
Alex Karasulu
James Strachan
Davanum Srinivas
Paul Fremantle
Dain Sundstrom
Brian McCallister
Robert Burrell Donkin
David Blevins
+1
-Brian
On Jan 8, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
ActiveMQ would like to move to graduate to a top level project, and
that the proposal at the end of this email be presented to the
board for consideration at the next meeting.
Status File: http://incubator.apache.org/projects
serve as the initial members of the
Apache ActiveMQ Project:
* Alan Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* David Jencks <[EMAIL PRO
he initial members of the Apache ActiveMQ
PMC:
Alan Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROT
Yes, er, where is the template? I feel like an idiot, but I cannot
find it!
-Brian
On Dec 19, 2006, at 5:49 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Brian,
I believe that you are looking for a software grant.
--- Noel
-Original Message-
From: Brian McCallister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
The Apache HTTPD project has decided (1) to import the wombat
codebase (2) and I have filled out all but one part of the ip
clearance form. The remaining part is the actual transfer of
copyright/assignment/etc. What form is correct for filling this out?
-Brian
1) https://svn.i-want-a-pony.
On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:27 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 12/6/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Concern:
Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation
to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the
current draft guidelines (2) I am uns
Concern:
Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation
to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the
current draft guidelines (2) I am unsure. I think Cliff voted for
this, so I suspect it is okay. Just want to make sure :-)
Nit:
I am unable to ver
+1 I have been watching the Cayenne goings-ons and am very impressed.
-Brian
On Dec 1, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Apache Cayenne community just voted to request graduation from the
Incubator as a TLP [1]. The text of the proposed board resolution
(adopted from iBatis graduatio
On Nov 17, 2006, at 6:20 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
So the fact that MINA is an incubating project shouldn't make it
*harder* to include than a non-Apache project.
For what it's worth, MINA isn't incubating, it is a TLP: http://
mina.apache.org/
-Brian
-
+1 though I'd consider making the configure script +x in the future.
-Brian
On Nov 14, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Nathan Mittler wrote:
The ActiveMQ community has voted on the release of ActiveMQ CPP 1.0
with a
total of 6 +1's.
The source bundle for the release candidate can be found here:
http://pe
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-activemq-dev/
200609.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote result:
The VOTE has passed with 7 ppmc +1's and no -1s.
+1 Hiram Chirino
+1 James Strachan
+1 Rob Davies
+1 Guillaume Nodet
+1 Brian McCallister
+1 Alan D. Cabrera
+1 A
+1
-Brian
On Sep 30, 2006, at 9:09 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Cayenne community has voted and approved 2.0.1 release of Cayenne.
This release marks a major milestone in Cayenne incubation as we've
fully resolved all IP issues and got rid of incompatible license
dependencies. Now we would
+1
-Brian
On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Howdy ActiveMQ Mentors... you know who you are :)
So far I think we have 2 binding +1's from:
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 James Strachan
I know you guys are probably busy, but could you please take a moment
and review the binaries?
On Aug 25, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
(including Martin, I believe)
s/Martin/Marshall/g
Doh! Sorry :-)
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 25, 2006, at 4:07 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
What does it *do*?
I believe it is basically a big, pluggable, harness for analyzing and
annotating streams of arbitrary data, if this is the same thing I
talked with a bunch of folks about (including Martin, I believe) a
couple years ago at
an
+1 Rob Davies
+1 Guillaume Nodet
+1 Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Aaron Mulder
+1 Brian McCallister
We also had 1 non ppmc +1:
+1 Kevan Miller
Release tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC3/
maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
Releases section of the Incubation P
On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:32 AM, James Strachan wrote:
On 8/16/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1), as
such we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working
under a "committer votes all count&quo
The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1), as
such we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working
under a "committer votes all count" style (really, everyone's vote
counts, it is on a public list without any of the "mine is binding"
stuff that has become
On Aug 13, 2006, at 10:49 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
-> Is Apache in the business of writing and publishing
specifications? <-
As long as Apache is not in the business of also creating
specifications, there will be by definition some separation
between code and spec p
AMQPD
-Brian
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
How about Qpid? It could mean Queuing Protocol for Information
Delivery or something like that.
Carl Trieloff wrote:
+1 for Kyma easy to say, read and use in code.
Archit Shah wrote:
More name ideas for Glasgow (and maybe f
-1
I think that this project is premature until the spec is in an open,
inclusive process or at an acceptable standards body with compatible
licensing terms. I would embrace this project were it so.
The project is supposed to be implementations of a "standard protocol"
but the protocol in questi
bly start the vote within the next 12-24
hours, unless there are other concerns that pop up.
See below.
Cliff
On 7/31/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am still uncomfortable with the AMQP spec ownership and process for
two reasons.
1) The pessimistic and defensive one
On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Could you clarify whether you are asking if the Glasgow project could
continue in a different direction from the spec, or whether the spec,
itself, could be changed/forked and distributed by the ASF?
If something were to happen to cause develo
On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Brian,
Just as in JCP, OASIS or W3C the real work happens on private
channels, that said we are in
the process of creating public pages, from which to link user and
feedback lists for anyone to
read, access and interact with the working grou
On Aug 1, 2006, at 1:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
The current working group is open to new members and is eager for
feedback from anyone.
Where are the archives of the discussions that have gotten it this
far so I can understand what is driving the process and be able to
contribute? What mai
On Jul 29, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Does anyone have any further concerns about this proposal?
- There was also the question about how the AMQP specification will be
handled and licensed. I started this thread with my feelings about
that aspect (short version: it looks better
+0 (I'd love to see it happen, but don't expect to be able to
contribute).
Nice folks, and anything with Upayavira, Sylvain, and Alex involved
is destined to conquer the world anyway :-)
-Brian
On Jul 26, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Upayavira wrote:
The Wicket developers (http://wicket.sourceforge
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 22:33 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Sahan,
Thank you for your interest, do you mind if we do a brief call
(or email...or discuss right here on the list -- whatever your
preference)
to underst
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
if blaze's goal is to create a standardized widely available and
interoperable messaging solution (you forgot enterprise class)
why is it creating a new one, and not using JMS ?
Blaze's goal (AMQP) is to provide multple
Comments in line:
On Jul 17, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
== Interactions with the specifications ==
The specification is being developed by group of companies, under a
contract that requires the resulting work to be published to a
standards body.
Which standards body? What lic
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
"IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
Q&A between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions should be archived and made available to those
not able to attend. However, using I
Just my 2 cents: I rather liked the name Heraldry as well -- thought
it was one of the more appropriate, and evocative, around =)
-Brian
On Jul 1, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 6/30/06, Matt Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For what it's worth, I don't have an issue with
On Jun 19, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
This proposal seeks to create a project within the Apache Software
Foundation to continue the development and advancement of Jini
technology. It has broad backing from the Jini Community, and
includes core developers from Sun Microsystems (original
TECTED]
Vote result:
The VOTE has passed with 9 ppmc +1's and no -1s.
+1 Hiram Chirino
+1 Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Adrian Co
+1 Brian McCallister
+1 Jonas Lim
+1 Bruce Snyder
+1 Fritz Oconer
+1 James Strachan
+1 Rob Davies
Release tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activem
+1
-Brian
On Jun 5, 2006, at 7:46 AM, James Strachan wrote:
We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to
address a few issues brought up in the Incubator PMC vote; I'd just
like to call another vote to explicitly approve the new binary distro
to avoid confusion (as most I
+1
-Brian
On May 26, 2006, at 5:11 AM, James Strachan wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0 release binary.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
perform the release.
Releas
On May 9, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Coach Wei wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to look at this proposal? I realize there
have
been a few other threads on this list in the last week, but I'd really
be interested in getting any feedback.
Off topic of the proposal -- how is scripting a UI in XML easier
http://archives.java.sun.com/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0604&L=jini-
users&F=&S=&P=4029
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
-Brian
On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1
week until S
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
