Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ratis as TLP Project

is created, the person holding such office to serve at the > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Ratis > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Ratis Project; > and be it furt

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.6.0 rc0

Dear IPMC members, We need one more binding vote for this release - the two mentors have already voted. Thanks, Arpit > On Jan 19, 2021, at 1:24 PM, Uma gangumalla wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Built from source and ran tests. - All passed > LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files exist. > Sigs and chec

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.6.0 rc0

+1 (binding) - Incubating in name - Verified signature, checksums - Disclaimer okay - LICENSE, NOTICE files look okay - Built from source On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:43 AM Elek, Marton wrote: > Hi Apache Incubator IPMC, > > Apache Ratis Thirdpardy 0.6.0-rc0 release is just passed on the PPMC > v

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 1.0.0 rc0

+1 (binding) - Release is in the right location - Verified signatures. checksums - NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER ok - Source matches git tag, no binaries in source tarball. There are a few empty dirs in the source tarball but not in the source repo. Should be harmless. - Built from source, ran u

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.5.0 rc0

+1 (binding) - RC is in the right location - Incubating in name - Source matches git tag, no unexpected binaries - DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE look ok - Verified signatures and checksums - Built from source - Successfully built Ratis using the generated thirdparty jars > On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:27

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.4.0 rc1

+1 (binding) - Verified signature and checksums - Incubating in name - DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE ok - Built from source - Built Ratis and Ozone using the RC1, ran smoke tests > On Apr 25, 2020, at 4:02 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh > wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > Apache Ratis Thirdpardy 0.4.0-rc1 vote [

Re: [VOTE] Accept YuniKorn into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Jan 13, 2020, at 9:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 6:47 PM Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > wrote: >> I'd like to call a vote on accepting YuniKorn into the Apache Incubator... > > +1 > > I'm copying the proposal text below, we usually do

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc4

Thanks, RATIS-680 [1] will fix LICENSE file issues in the next release. 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-680 > On Sep 17, 2019, at 3:00 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > > +1 (binding) good to se ether NOTICE issues have been f

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc4

Copying my vote from the Ratis dev list. +1 (binding) - Verified signatures. - Verified checksums - Source matches git tag - Built from source - Ran unit tests - Release is in the right location Arpit > On Sep 16, 2019, at 5:39 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh > wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > > The Apache R

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc3

Thank you Justin. We will fix these. Are there any tools to verify the LICENSE/NOTICE files short of doing it manually? dropwizard-hadoop-metrics2 has a NOTICE file [1]. Should we not include its contents? 1. https://github.com/joshelser/dropwizard-hadoop-metrics2/blob/master/NOTICE > On Aug

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc3

+Mukul > On Aug 22, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Arpit Agarwal wrote: > > Transferring my vote from the dev@ratis vote thread. > > +1 (binding) > > - Verified checksums and signatures. > - Verified release source matches git release tag. > - Built from source > - Ran u

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc3

Transferring my vote from the dev@ratis vote thread. +1 (binding) - Verified checksums and signatures. - Verified release source matches git release tag. - Built from source - Ran unit tests which passed - Ran file store example Regards, Arpit > On Aug 22, 2019, at 11:41 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc2

Carrying forward my (non-binding) vote from the dev@ratis list. +1 - Verified signatures - Verified hashes - Verified source distro contents match git rc tag - LICENSE and NOTICE files look ok - Built from source - Ran all unit tests Thanks for putting together this RC Nicholas. > On Apr 14, 2

Re: [VOTE] Accept Zipkin into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 8/26/18, 8:14 PM, "Mick Semb Wever" wrote: After a brief discussion¹ I would like to call a VOTE to accept Zipkin into the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available on the wiki² and is pasted below in text form as well. This vote will run at least

Re: [VOTE] Accept Druid into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) > On Feb 22, 2018, at 11:03 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Hi all, > > After some discussion on the Druid proposal[1], I'd like to > start a vote on accepting Druid into the Apache Incubator, > per the ASF policy[2] and voting rules[3]. > > A vote for accepting a new Apache Incub

Re: [VOTE] Livy to enter Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 5/31/17, 6:03 AM, "Sean Busbey" wrote: Hi folks! I'm calling a vote to accept "Livy" into the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below, and is also available in the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LivyProposal For

Re: [VOTE] Ratis to enter Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 12/16/16, 3:41 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote: Dear All, I would like to call a vote for accepting "Ratis" for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below, and is also available at this wiki link. https://wiki.apache.org/incu