> On May 5, 2017, at 4:27 AM, sospartan wrote:
>
> I'll remove whole playground sample app from artifacts innext release. So
> #7 would be a problem anymore.
> As the gradle wrapper will be removed too. I'll suggest use installed
> gradle to create that. These will be put in new "how to build fr
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 5:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>>> the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
>>
>> So it might be a good idea to point people to the right docs there?
>>
>
> I know when I pointed this out to the PPMC a few
of the Apache Geode Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Geode Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initi
Thanks, updated with notes on RE50.
Anthony
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 1:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 03/11/2016 19:47, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Maturity assessment:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Podling+Maturity+Assessment
>
> I'd like to see this updated to us
Justin, thanks for the quick review! Comments inline.
> On Oct 21, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - files name contain incubating
> - signatures and hashes good
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - NOTICE and LICENSE have some very minor issues (see below)
The Apache Geode team is proud to announce Apache Geode release
1.0.0-incubating.M3.
Apache Geode (incubating) is a data management platform that provides
a database-like consistency model, reliable transaction processing and
a shared-nothing architecture to maintain very low latency performance
w
The vote passes with 3 binding +1 votes:
- Justin Mclean
- Roman Shaposhnik
- Konstantin Boudnik
and no 0 or -1 votes.
Thanks to everyone for their review and feedback!
Anthony
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:24 PM, William Markito wrote:
>
> Hello Incubator IPMC,
>
> This is a call for a vote on t
As a data point, for Apache Geode we have a detailed release page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Steps
We’ve been rotating RM’s for each release and the notes get enhanced each time
through the process.
Feedback welcome!
Thanks,
Anthony
> On Aug 19, 2016, at 7:33 A
Thanks for the review Justin!
We’d really like to close out this release soon and a few more votes would
really help.
TIA,
Anthony
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 7:52 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> For the source release I checked:
> - names contain incubating
> - signatures goo
In a recent thread on the dev@geode list [1] the subject of naming for
package manager distributions came up, specifically around a Homebrew
formula [2] for Apache Geode. Does the ASF provide a recommendation on the
preferred format when a project name is used in a technical context? That
is, sho
Thanks for the feedback Justin!
> On Apr 19, 2016, at 7:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures correct
> - DISCLAIMER exits
> - source LICENSE has some minor issues (see below)
> - source NOICE is good
> - several JS files are mi
Done.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-244
Anthony
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 8:57 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Justin and Bertrand's analysis, but I would also request
> that you open a LEGAL Jira requesting that the MX4J license be added
> to the list of approved
Thanks for the help!
Anthony
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 4:50 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> INAL but this is what I would do:
> - Add a pointer (i.e. path to the file) and the copyright owner to the full
> text of the license in LICENSE
> - Add the notice “This product includes software devel
I'm working on clearing an issue [1] found during the review for Geode
1.0.0-incubating.M1 [2] (thanks Justin!). We have a bundled source
dependency on an MX4J file [3]. The file in question has a license [4]
that is similar but different to ASF v1.1 [5].
How should we deal with this license? C
Thanks for clarifying this Justin. Filed GEODE-914 to clean this up.
Anthony
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> NOTICE contains copyright, commons-io [2]
>
> It’s my understanding that for an ASF produced product with the name,
> copyright and “this software pr
ng.IllegalArgumentException
>
> *> Building 60% > :gemfire-core:test > 1382 tests completed, 2 failed, 31
> skipped*
>
>
> Not sure if there's something to do about these 2 tests.
>
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:32 PM Anthony Baker wrote:
&
Hi Justin,
As I mentioned in my other response, thanks for the great feedback and quick
turnaround! I filed JIRA’s based on the issues you noted below.
Anthony
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +0.5 for the license issues and unable to compile. Willing to chang
Justin,
Thanks for the great feedback!
Regarding the NOTICE in the binary distribution: the contents came directly
from NOTICE files contained in bundled dependencies included in the
distribution. I’m sure I don’t completely understand the requirements yet [1]
so thanks for any clarification
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release
1.0.0-incubating.M1.
This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.M1.RC2, has successfully passed a vote
for a release on the geode developer mailing list.
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geod
Thanks so much for helping to clarify these details. Having just worked
through some of these questions I can say I would have definitely benefitted
from having this information available.
Anthony
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:42 AM,
20 matches
Mail list logo
