Hello all,
The Apache MXNet (incubating) Community announces the availability of
Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1!
Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for
both efficiency and flexibility. It allows you to mix symbolic and
imperative programming to maximize efficiency a
Hi all,
Thanks a lot for taking the time out to vote and for your suggestions.
The vote is passed with 4 +1s (binding).
Binding +1:
Sergio
Sebastian
Jean-Baptiste
Jim
I will proceed with the next steps for the release.
Thanks,
Anirudh
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for the suggestion. I will take care to fix our docs for future
releases.
Anirudh
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Sebastian wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> verified signatures and checksum, could successfully build from source on
> ubuntu 16
>
> -s
>
&g
vote will end at Monday July 16th, 8:10 PDT.
[ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.1
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Thanks,
Anirudh
save_params was called. We are fixing it to provide a warning message for
both use cases, so that users may not end up replacing save_params with the
wrong API.
My sincere apologies to the mentors, for creating additional work.
Anirudh
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 6:44 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Ment
Hi,
We are cancelling this vote because we need to improve the warning message
when users use a deprecated API: `save_params`. We will address the issue
and send out a new release for another vote.
Thanks,
Anirudh
Hi Sergio,
The 1.2.0 release notes have been added to NEWS.md. Thanks for pointing
about CODEOWNERS file. Agree that it is not required in the source release
and I will add its removal to the release steps so that it can be removed
next time.
Anirudh
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Sergio
e this package as 1.2.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Anirudh
Hello all,
The Apache MXNet (incubating) Community announces the availability of
Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0!
Blog:
https://medium.com/apache-mxnet/announcing-apache-mxnet-1-2-0-d94f56da154b
Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for
both efficiency and flexibili
Hi,
Thank you all for voting and providing your inputs.
The vote has passed with three +1 binding votes and no -1 or 0 votes.
+1 (binding):
Sergio
Henri
Sebastian
I will follow up on Monday, on the next steps for the release.
Anirudh
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Sebastian wrote:
>
es
The vote will end at 1:00 PM on Friday, May 18th, PDT.
[ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Anirudh
Thank you Justin for your inputs and explanation ! I really appreciate your
efforts to evaluate the release. I will extend the vote till Monday 12:00
PM PDT (if its permitted) to see what other IPMC members have to say about
category b content in the release.
Anirudh
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 12
ludes)
At this point I want to ask you what your blocking concerns are.
Is it only the CC-BY-2.5 license for DevGuide.md in googletest submodule or
is it also the missing headers for contrib and the broad rat excludes ?
Anirudh
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
&g
ile.
Please let me know if my assumption is wrong.
The explanation for other items in rat excludes is available in the doc
maintained by Meghna:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Licenses
Anirudh
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Anirudh wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
&g
Hi Hen,
Sorry I misunderstood. The doc can definitely be removed from release when
doing tar.gz build.
I for some reason was thinking about the release tag on github.
Anirudh
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Hen wrote:
> I'll poke the legal-discuss thread; however why can't we h
information being in README and API docs enough
or do we need to add a
warning for Creative commons license when script is launched ?
Anirudh
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
> My reading of that is the documentation is under a CC license and the code
> under a
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > For 1 and 2, Considering that the Creative Commons License files aren't
> > part of the release source itself but downloaded when user calls some
> > specific api or runs some script, would these be blocking issues ?
>
> No but thi
forward to any other
suggestions you have related to this.
I would really appreciate any other advice or suggestions you have on how
to handle these issues.
Anirudh
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Anirudh wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Just to make sure I understand: Do you want us to review rat
been added to LICENSE.
Anirudh
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 1:44 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I am not able to reproduce the issue you mentioned with unknown licenses.
> > When I try to run apache rat on the downloaded source it says 0 unknown
> > licenses. Does the s
source you are looking at include build artifacts by
chance ?
Thanks,
Anirudh
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:48 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but it’s -1 binding as issues raised last incubator vote haven’t
> been fixed and the source release include Category B content. [2]
&
Hi Henri,
Thank you for your kind words! Really appreciate you and Sebastian checking
the release.
Anirudh
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:52 AM, Hen wrote:
> +1.
>
> Reviewed diff between 1.1.0 and 1.2.0 source releases for anything unusual.
> Sampled new files in 1.2.0 for source head
luence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.2.0+Release+Notes
The vote will end at 10:30 AM on Friday, May 11th, PDT.
[ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Anirudh
22 matches
Mail list logo
