+1 (non-binding, I believe)
Angie
At 02:46 AM 9/17/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's first milestone
> release (PhotArk M1-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval
> to publish th
And my big question: if we are allowed to do this, I think I read
somewhere that we aren't allowed to refer to the project as Apache
PhotArk yet because we are still a podling. What is the proper way
to refer to the podling?
Angie
At 02:56 PM 8/3/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3,
what my guidelines are...
Thanks,
Angie
At 03:05 AM 7/29/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Angela
Cymbalak wrote:
> Carsten - Sorry to see you go.
Same feeling here Carsten... and Thanks for all the help so far
>
> All - I have been thinking a lot abo
Carsten - Sorry to see you go.
All - I have been thinking a lot about the project and part of my
problem is being unsure of what documentation needs to be included in
the project so we can get a release out. Luciano has done a fabulous
job so far and I would hate to see the project go any mor
meritocracy. Every person who is
> currently part of the community has given a significant contribution of
> either architecture expertise and/or code.
>
> == Community ==
>
> After the initial proposal for a Caitrin podling, which came with no
> community at all, a small community ha
others are
interested in showcasing how particular technologies can be used to
solve some aspect of the problem.
Core Developers
Angela Cymbalak
Known Risks
Orphaned Projects
We are starting with a very small community. While several people are
interested, it remains to be seen how much
I think that I am in a unique position to comment on this
question. I am sure there are a lot of legal things and the Maven
repository that can be pointed to as reasons why not to have an
Incubator but I have been very pleased with the fact that Apache
*does* have the Incubator. It has been i
required for the project proposal.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Angela Cymbalak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right now the project lacks a Champion and Mentors and I don't want to call
> for a vote before having those. The proposal is also not as well
written as
>
Right now the project lacks a Champion and Mentors and I don't want
to call for a vote before having those. The proposal is also not as
well written as it should be because it lacks a lot of
detail. However, as Noel mentioned we are going to move the
architecture discussions to the projects@
Isn't labs for something already inside of Apache and the Incubator
for things outside of Apache?
Angie
At 09:11 AM 7/3/2008, you wrote:
If it's a new project, then why does it have to be incubated?
Couldn't we just start up a "labs" project to tinker around with the
idea. Then, when/if it bu
Sorry for the flood of emails this morning. I answered my own
questions. Thinking abstractly before 8:45 AM hurts my head...
I think the answer to the question should we provide a rigid backend
structure or just an interface is a good question. And I think that
the answer is a qualified bo
Noel,
Can you dive into the idea a little more about not providing a
backend storage mechanism for the photo gallery? Wouldn't JCR give
you the option of not having a rigid backend but be more
flexible? If you provide interfaces, what would they interface with
on the backend? Maybe all the
.
Angie
At 05:00 AM 7/1/2008, you wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Angela Cymbalak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I just haven't figured out how Sling may play into that
and what that means for the actual storage mechanism. Does anyone from the
Sling p
Its looking like if we glue together a whole
bunch of existing Apache and Incubator projects
that we won't have a whole lot of code to
actually write. :-) That all by itself can be a challenge.
Angie
At 08:14 PM 6/30/2008, you wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Angela Cym
s very own
project, having the proposal written will still provide a good road
map as we start to move the project forward.
Angie
At 06:01 PM 6/30/2008, you wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Angela Cymbalak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...I just haven't figured out how Sling
At 04:32 PM 6/30/2008, Noel wrote:
> I am convinced that Jackrabbit is the direction to go for the
> mid-tier of the application.
My only question is whether or not we lose anything from that decision, but
if I didn't think that the JCR was the right way to go, I wouldn't have
brought it up.
These are all great suggestions. Of course, I have my favorites but
I am interested in seeing what others who may be interested have to say.
I have also updated the proposal a bit. Any ideas would be great to
hear! I am convinced that Jackrabbit is the direction to go for the
mid-tier of th
says that the proposal is being put
on hold and that the goal is to work with the Roller community.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CaitrinProposal
Nevertheless, if there's interest in building a Flex front end, let me
know...
--
Martin Cooper
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Angela C
this proposal please let me
know. The interest seems to be lurking out there, we just need to
get it organized.
Thanks,
Angie
--
Angela Cymbalak
Nechtan Design
http://www.nechtandesign.com/
412.931.4663
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
+1
I am completely willing to toss my code aside as things start moving
along (or even before). As for the name, I needed a name and found
one. But, Noel had a good idea for a different name. Still working
with it but I like it. :-)
Angie
At 10:21 PM 5/20/2008, you wrote:
Luciano Resend
For those who indicated an interest in helping with Caitrin I have
posted the code and started a mail list. They can be found at
http://www.nechtan.org/caitrin.html
The code is pretty much a hack job but it is a start. The first
thing that needs done is a proper database class needs to be
w
There has been some interest shown in the Caitrin project. There are
2 people at Roller who have shown interest in creating a plugin for
photo gallery software to be used with Roller. There is one person
on the general list who has stated they are willing to
contribute. While this is not a l
st couple weeks,
I've been planning to do a simple photo gallery application that would
demo the Tuscany/SCA Web 2.0 capabilities, but looks like I could
apply some of my ideas to Caitrin as well.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Angela Cymbalak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel
Noel,
Would you be willing to Champion the proposal? There is interest at
Roller to write a plugin for the software and I am working on writing
the proposal for that as well. I think that this software is best as
its own project though because it could get very big.
Angie
At 08:59 AM 5/19
I must say that this thread has become a very interesting read...
At 04:56 PM 5/7/2008, you wrote:
>
> And spend a lot of time learning about "The Apache Way".
> Getting the podling up to speed is no small task for a
> single person, even if mentors help with it.
Well, I think it is benefic
I have started writing the draft of the proposal for Caitrin which is
the photo gallery software I had mentioned a few weeks ago. As I was
writing the proposal it has become more clear to me that what I have
is code and not a community, although I believe a community can be
built around the pr
Components: site
Environment: all
Reporter: Angela Cymbalak
Priority: Minor
the paragraph:
Every proposal is different. There will always be some aspects which do not seem
to fit well into the template.
Use the template as a guide but do not feel
I am happy to write up the proposal. The more I read and think about
this project the more I really think that it would be a great one for
Apache to undertake if the appropriate community can be built around it.
The only thing holding up my proposal writing is my concern for the
process. The
--
Angela Cymbalak
Nechtan Design
http://www.nechtandesign.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29 matches
Mail list logo
