Bump. I could still do with another vote from an IPMC member.
Thanks,
Ali
On 12 November 2015 at 16:02, Ali Lown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I could still do with someone else taking a look at these artifacts.
>
> Currently there is one +1 vote from Justin Mclean, and one +1 vote
&
hanks,
Ali
On 3 November 2015 at 16:09, Ali Lown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
> its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
>
> The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
> non-bindin
Removing them seems reasonable. They are only used as part of a
test-case, which is only accessed if someone is developing using the
hosted editor.
I shall do this as part of the next release.
Ali
On 10 November 2015 at 23:44, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Do you have the authors permission
Hi Justin,
>> Are you referring to the screenshots under war/static/? Those are
>> untouched since the migration from Google, so fall under the license
>> from them.
>
> Not the screen shots no but the photos found in here:
> ./src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/editor/harness/public/pics/
>
> Do yo
Hi Justin,
Thanks for taking a look at the RC, we will fix these minor points for
the next release.
> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I assume you
> have permission from the person who took them to use these? IF so you may
> want to put that in the LICENSE.
Are
Hi Ian,
Perhaps you could provide some more information on exactly what steps
you took to the wave-dev list, where we can try to help you with
getting this to work on your machine, I doubt everyone else on
incubator-general is quite as interested...
Using a different Java version on Windows norma
Hi Ian,
I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I have
always used the CLI tools directly. I have CC'd the dev-list in case
they have a better answer for you.
The inability to find ${build.classpath.path}, ${build.macros.path}
suggests that you are missing/failed-to-import/
ber 2015 at 15:38, Ali Lown wrote:
>> Hi Sebb,
>>
>> Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
>>
>> I have updated the downloads page removing the link to the RC, and
>> clarifying the differences of the available download options: 1) no
>> official relea
Hi,
Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
non-binding votes from the community.
PPMC vote call:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubato
Hi Sebb,
Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
I have updated the downloads page removing the link to the RC, and
clarifying the differences of the available download options: 1) no
official releases, get RC from mailing list, 2) or risk the automated
build
Is this what you had in mind? Let
Clean this up from the voting monitor.
This has been superseded by RC4 at the project level anyway...
Sorry for leaving it open for so long. (I may have forgotten it)
Ali
On 15 June 2013 23:24, Ali Lown wrote:
> The Wave community has voted on and approved the proposal to release
> Apach
e.
Thanks,
Ali
On 15 Jun 2013 23:24, "Ali Lown" wrote:
> The Wave community has voted on and approved the proposal to release
> Apache Wave 0.4 (incubating) based on RC3.
>
> This will be the initial incubator release for Wave.
>
> The proposal for release can be fou
The Wave community has voted on and approved the proposal to release
Apache Wave 0.4 (incubating) based on RC3.
This will be the initial incubator release for Wave.
The proposal for release can be found at:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3ccabrgrvd6n5_ll
13 matches
Mail list logo
