Re: [VOTE] Accept Airavata into the Incubator

+1 Alek -- The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airavata into the Incubator

+1 Alek -- The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay

Re: [VOTE] Werner as juice committer

Davanum Srinivas wrote: As part of reviving juice, can we please VOTE werner as a committer to enable him to continue his offline work? [1] it is great to see this happening! Here's my +1. +1 (not sure if i have a binding vote for this) best, alek [1] : http://www.nabble.com/Statu

Re: Proposition: Twister WS-BPEL engine and Apache Agila

i agree that TLP is very important and very good for visibility that apache has now place for workflows but i look on it more like umbrella TLP with many subprojects? the reason for this is that i have a different opinion about BPEL. i think there is a clear need *now* for apache-licensed BPEL

Re: Proposition: Twister WS-BPEL engine and Apache Agila

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: +1 for merging in BPEL support using Twister. Geir, I'd like to understand the BPEL plans for Agila a bit more. I'm a co-author of the BPEL spec and have done an impl of it in IBM (BPWS4J- which was released via alphaworks a while back). My intuition is that a solid impl

Re: XNode 1.1 API submission

Murray Altheim wrote: Hi all, This is a proposal for a metadata API for use in Xindice, though it can be used more generally for adding an XML metadata wrapper around an XML node. In short, it's SOAP-like, but *actually* simple. Brian suggested I join this list and make the proposal here. I've i

Re: [vote] XMLBeans to enter XML incubation [was: Re: Vote for XMLBeansproposal in the XML Project (was RE: Vote for XMLBeans proposal)]

Steven Noels wrote: Dear committers, as outlined in the xml.apache.org charter (section 6.2), and in collaboration with the Incubator (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/STATUS?rev=HEAD) Subject to: - relicensing of the XMLBeans codebase using the ASL 1.1 license (http://xml.apache.

Re: Vote for XMLBeans proposal

Berin Lautenbach wrote: Ted Leung wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: If XML.Apache is willing, as it seems, to cater for this project, I'll wait for a vote from them, an ACK from the Bea guys, and start preparing the hatcher :-) I'm happy to invest some time in helping XMLBean get throught the

Re: XMLBeans performance and source code status [Re: Proposal: XMLBeans]

David Bau wrote: >Adding a few links and other info - > >Eric Vasilik writes: > >>The synchronization described refers to the fact >>that one may manipulate the XML via the XmlCursor >>or the strongly typed XMLBean classes generated from >>the schema > > >As Eric says, we don't want to confuse the

XMLBeans performance and source code status [Re: Proposal: XMLBeans]

Cliff Schmidt wrote: What's compelling about XMLBeans compared to some of the other front runners, such as JDOM and XOM, Castor and JAXB? The main difference between XMLBeans and JDOM or XOM is that XMLBeans does not create objects for each XML information item. Instead, it provides cursor-

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenSAML as part of Web Services

+1 alek Davanum Srinivas wrote: Incubator folks, We are starting a VOTE in ws-pmc. Will let you know the results. Dear WS PMC Members, Here's our first VOTE...Accept OpenSAML as a Web Services project. Details: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?OpenSAMLProposal Previous Discussio