The code was under the Apache license since the beginning but without
header setted (as far as I know). I will check with Laurent
internally.
Regards
JB
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 8:38 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I can also see that the Apache license was added later, so the code wasn’t
>
Hi,
> Sorry - the contractor thing is my speculation. Laurent simply stated
> "[...]the individuals mentioned in the ip review at
> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-flight-sql-odbc.html do not
> hold rights over the code as they were employed by Dremio at that time". They
> used
Hi,
I can also see that the Apache license was added later, so the code wasn’t
initially under the Apache license. But I’ve not seen which contributors might
be impacted by that.
The license was added 3 years ago (June 2022), and the copyright in the headers
is " Copyright (C) 2020-2022 Dremi
Sorry - the contractor thing is my speculation. Laurent simply stated "[...]the
individuals mentioned in the ip review at
https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-flight-sql-odbc.html do not
hold rights over the code as they were employed by Dremio at that time". They
used a similar proc
Hi,
> Yes, Laurent Goujon stated to me they were all employed by Dremio at the time
> (*possibly as contractors, from what I understand).
Contractors may retain IP rights, it is for instance, the default under
Australian law. Do we have anything more than that to go on?
Kind Regards,
Justin
--
Yes, Laurent Goujon stated to me they were all employed by Dremio at the time
(*possibly as contractors, from what I understand).
Best,
David
On Thu, May 15, 2025, at 14:30, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
>> - Dremio has informed me (in a private email exchange) that they hold all
>> rights to th
HI,
> - Dremio has informed me (in a private email exchange) that they hold all
> rights to the code to be donated and they believe contributor ICLAs are
> unnecessary.
Did Dremio say why they hold all rights to the code? Being on an open-source
project on GitHub doesn't guarantee that. I can
Yeah. Feel free to ping me in a PR or slack if you need details.
Basically we should have BSD and MIT license content (text) documented in
the LICENSE file (either inline or adding a directory with license content.
Regards
JB
Le jeu. 15 mai 2025 à 05:24, Zhengtao Zhong a écrit :
> OK, I will
OK, I will fix it. Is it convenient for you to post some details about the
LICENSE not passing?
On 2025/05/14 15:34:51 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> -1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - OK: source distribution signature and checksum are OK
> - OK: LICENSE and NOTICE are good in the source distributio
Hello,
Apache Arrow is receiving a donation of an ODBC driver [1], currently in a pull
request, to be merged into a branch on the main Arrow repository. This is the
formal request to check the clearance. The software grant has been filed and
the Arrow PMC vote has been conducted.
Please vote t
-1 (binding)
I checked:
- OK: source distribution signature and checksum are OK
- OK: LICENSE and NOTICE are good in the source distribution (nit:
it's not required to have Maven wrapper NOTICE as it's an ASF project)
- OK: DISCLAIMER is present in the source distribution
- OK: ASF header is prese
GeaFlow looks interesting for stream and batch integration graph compute
engine. +1 for me.
Regards,
Nicholas Jiang
On 2025/05/14 01:42:41 Willem Jiang wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion about accepting GeaFlow into the Apache
> Incubator.
>
> GeaFlow is a distributed str
12 matches
Mail list logo
