Re: [DISCUSS] Accept SAFplus into the Apache Incubator

Hi Justin, > All contributors were employed by OpenClovis, which means the company paid > > them for their code, so the Intellectual Property Rights in this case > must > > belong to the company. > > Looking at the contributors here [1], I see some are not part of the Open > Clovis organisation. H

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept SAFplus into the Apache Incubator

Hi Justin and PJ, All contributors were employed by OpenClovis, which means the company paid them for their code, so the Intellectual Property Rights in this case must belong to the company. Therefore, the company has full copyrights for the product, in contrast, the contributors have no any copyr

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept SAFplus into the Apache Incubator

Hi Justin, > > > I, on behalf of the contributors, confirmed that we agree to the license > change. > > We need a bit more than that. Can we see where all of the contribitors > have agreed to this? > > As a first step, can you supply a list of all contributors and whether > they were employed by

[DISCUSS] Project Name Must Be Resolved Before Entering Incubation

Hi, TL; DR: I made a pull request today [1] for improving podling name search words and links. Welcome to review. [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/131 Long version: This continues a previous thread around trademarks@ [2]. [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/r7zl44yccft8ojhsl8mklp5wt