Re: [DISCUSS] PouchDB Proposal

2025-03-12 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hey all, > On 5. Mar 2025, at 13:26, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> On 5. Mar 2025, at 13:21, PJ Fanning wrote: >> >> * Once you have IPMC membership, you will be able to add this to >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Proposals > > Will do! Done: https://cwiki.apache.org/con

[RESULT][VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] Cassandra Cluster Manager (CCM)

2025-03-12 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Vote passes with twelve +1s (ten binding). > On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 5:18 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: >>> Please vote on the acceptance of the Cassandra Cluster Manager (CCM) and its IP Clearance: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cassandra-ccm.html All consent fr

Re: [DISCUSS] PouchDB Proposal

2025-03-12 Thread PJ Fanning
Looks like a Confluence issue regarding the New Podling Proposal template. I see the same issue where 'edit' opens the OpenServerless proposal. Could you remove 'incubator' from the mailing lists and git repo names? They are not required and it simplifies things not to have it. Regarding the lice

Re: Clarification on the -1 policy for code changes

2025-03-12 Thread Paolo Bizzarri
Hi Tison, thanks for the clarification. You are right, the voting document says that only PPMC members have vetoing rights. I think this answer my initial question, i.e: - vetos on code changes exist, as per Apache Voting Process - PPMC members can veto code changes - including proposals like t

Re: Clarification on the -1 policy for code changes

2025-03-12 Thread tison
Hi Paolo, Perhaps the wording in the voting process [1] page is not accurate. In my understanding, the "Binding votes" part is appled for all the three vote types. It writes: > Who can vote is, to some extent, a community-specific thing. > > PMC members have formally binding votes, but in general