Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

+1 （binding） I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - disclaimer exists - license and notice files look good - file have correct ASF headers if necessary On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 12:45 PM Paul King wrote: > For clarity, my +1 also means no show-stoppers for me. I think

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

For clarity, my +1 also means no show-stoppers for me. I think the KEYS file is fixable now and is worth doing. Otherwise this looks like a great step forward and the other caveats, similarly to the things JB mentioned, can be addressed in future releases. Cheers, Paul. On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 1

Re: Seeking a Champion for Hamilton and/or Burr to apply for the Apache Incubator Program

Hi Everyone, Apologies for the delay here (🤷‍♂️ *life *🤷‍♂️). @PJ, Ayush, and Kevin - thank you for the offer of mentoring. I have shared this raw draft google doc with you that lays out the proposa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

Casting my +1 (binding) from the dev mailing list (see https://lists.apache.org/thread/24y2h0y5z108zn062o7djwkh6kf538mz) I mentioned a few nits (not release blocker) that Wayang can address in next releases. Thanks, Regards JB On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 4:59 PM Paul King wrote: > > I'd normally exp

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

+1 (binding - with caveats) I checked: * checksum * incubating in the source zip name * DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE present in source zip * signatures okay (but see note about KEYS in earlier email) * maven clean install passed with JDK 11 * some acceptable binary files: the images/pdf/omnigraffle

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

If you have some kind of template that is used when generating the email for this list, it might pay to include wording about the PPMC vote, so that it doesn't get missed in the future. I also noted that you don't mention the KEYS file in either this thread or the PPMC vote thread. In general, you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Seata (Incubating) 2.3.0-RC3

Hi Te Wang, Sorry for the late reply, I was travelling during the weekend and yesterday. Yes, the LICENSE file should mention any file containing code coming from other projects. So, I agree with your change on the LICENSE file about Maven Wrapper and Spring Boot. I would also mention PathMap.js