+1 (binding) (IPMC, id: shaofengshi)
I checked the followings:
[*] Download links are valid.
[*] Checksums and signatures.
[*] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[*] No unexpected binary files
[*] Can compile from source
Best regards,
Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
Apache Kylin PMC member,
Apache Incubator PMC membe
Hi,
> Could you give an example of what exactly you mean for re-located
> copyright statements?
Generally, these are files donated in a software grant whose copyright
statement has been removed from their file headers, and the copyright line has
been relocated to the NOTICE file. The NOTICE fil
Justin,
Could you give an example of what exactly you mean for re-located
copyright statements?
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 6:28 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks Justin for the detailed analysis.
> > Checking LEGAL-469 [1], the only issue that seems to force an RC4, is
> >
Hello Incubator Community,
Based on the votes and the identified blockers referenced in [1], I am
canceling the Apache KIE(incubating) v10.0.0-rc3 vote. You can view
the thread here [2].
We'll work to incorporate the feedback and fix the identified blockers in RC4.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/
Hi,
> Thanks Justin for the detailed analysis.
> Checking LEGAL-469 [1], the only issue that seems to force an RC4, is
> the CDDL/GPL licensed source file.
Currently, there are several Category X/Category B codes in the release
artifact, I did not list them all. Also those licenses should also b
Great work on the proposal, Mick and team!
I'm signing up as one of the mentors.
-Lari
On 2024/11/11 14:34:56 Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Hi Apache Incubator folks,
>
> Proposing a new project: Hunter.
>
> Hunter is a tool that detects statistically significant changes in
> time-series data store
Thanks John. You are right that Mozilla Public License file needs to
be included in the KIE source LICENSE - ideally with a link to the
source file.
- incubator-kie-drools/drools-docs/supplemental-ui/js/search-ui.js
https://gitlab.com/antora/antora-lunr-extension/-/blob/main/LICENSE
This is becau
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 5:21 AM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Thanks Justin for the detailed analysis.
> Checking LEGAL-469 [1], the only issue that seems to force an RC4, is
> the CDDL/GPL licensed source file.
>
The MPL issue I raised is Category B. It's not listed in the LICENSE.
It's a blocker.
The
Thanks Justin for the detailed analysis.
Checking LEGAL-469 [1], the only issue that seems to force an RC4, is
the CDDL/GPL licensed source file.
Legal-469 says: Blocker - must be fixed and and revote on
* 3rd party Category X or Category B bundled code licenses not listed in LICENSE
It appears t
+1 non-binding
Here is what i checked
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each Answer repo.
[x] All files have license headers if neces
10 matches
Mail list logo
