BTW, the unpacked folders name:
apache-seata-2.1.0-incubating-src.zip -> incubator-seata-2.1.0
apache-seata-2.1.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz -> apache-seata
looks unaligned. I suppose you try to name them:
apache-seata-2.1.0-incubating-src.zip -> apache-seata-2.1.0-incubating-src
apache-seata-2.1.0-i
+1 (binding)
I checked:
* Download links work
* Signature and checksum matches
gpg: Signature made 六 6/15 06:08:36 2024 PDT
gpg:using RSA key B51F1A5056BC5D6FBF2D82871E90338E9FA7635C
gpg: Good signature from "jimin (CODE SIGN) " [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified
HI -
The first place to go is to check on license availability is the legal resolved
page[1]. There you can learn the various classes of dependencies as well as
resolved issues about licenses that have already discussed on
legal-disc...@apache.org
[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
You should use https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/seata/KEYS
instead of dist dev.
You can upload the KEYS file to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/seata/KEYS and
the downloads link would work.
Best,
tison.
Min Ji 于2024年7月5日周五 10:03写道：
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for vo
Hello,
This is a call for vote on releasing Apache Seata(incubating) v2.1.0-RC4.
The vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/s0gxv49802kk8y3dnxr8ytxy6ghkkjr6
Vote Result:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/km5dzmhw2j7ow86pk3g81f1z50sojomz
The release candidates:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/
Yes I know the deal. I was not aware we should avoid even mentioning we
started the project but I am perfectly fine with it.
Michele Sciabarra | CEO
m: +44 747 984 8388
e: mich...@nuvolaris.io
l: https://linkedin.com/in/msciab
Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street , Wilmington DE
www.nuvolaris.io
Il Ven 5 Lug 2024, 17:34 Michele Sciabarra ha
scritto:
> Hi PJ , sorry for my naiveness, I did not realize it could have been a
> problem.
> I changed to Apache OpenServerless committer as there is not (yet) a PMC
> ... hope this is not problematic.
>
Thank you
For reference: we (in the ASF in
Hi PJ , sorry for my naiveness, I did not realize it could have been a
problem.
I changed to Apache OpenServerless committer as there is not (yet) a PMC
... hope this is not problematic.
On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 16:15, PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hi Michele,
>
> One tangential observation: your email foote
Hi Michele,
One tangential observation: your email footer says you are the Apache
Serverless Founder. Calling oneself the Founder of an Apache project
or podling is generally regarded as problematic.
2 discussions that I have found on this list.
* https://lists.apache.org/thread/4wks6yjlzo4f623df
> an optional dependency
I second Justin's opinion, while "an opt dep" generally means: if you
use it only for test, it should be fine; if you support user to self
deploy or get a provision by themselves, and use your ALv2 licensed
SDK to connect to it, it should be fine.
But if you'd like to bun
Hi,
I would ask legal-disc...@apache.org, but it would not be allowed unless it is
an optional dependency. However, it depends on the exact details.
Kind Regards,
Justin
> On 5 Jul 2024, at 6:45 pm, Michele Sciabarra
> wrote:
>
> If this is not the right place to ask this question please ign
If this is not the right place to ask this question please ignore it and
let me know where I should ask.
We are starting the OpenServerless project and checking licenses.
We have one component in our project, Minio, which is AGPL Licensed.
We know AGPL is not to be used in Apache Code but here w
12 matches
Mail list logo
