Hi,
The CC BY 4.0 is not compatible with the Apache license, so I would avoid it if
you can. While the Apache license is intended for code, it’s OK to use for
documentation as well.
Kind Regards,
Justin
> On 2 May 2024, at 1:25 pm, tison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is ma
Hi,
IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is mainly to license code and related stuff
that constructs the final software.
However, projects may also create text content like documents. Is it
appropriate to use Apache License 2.0 for them (since quite a few terms may
not be applicable)? Or what licenses sh
On Wed, 1 May 2024 at 18:14, tison wrote:
>
> Hi Sebb,
>
> I'm trying to make a reference in the next OpenDAL release, that staging
> the download pages and links.
>
> Here is a technical issue. Before the release is out, which link should be
> used? IIUC we can use the link at [1]. But it doesn't
Hi Sebb,
I'm trying to make a reference in the next OpenDAL release, that staging
the download pages and links.
Here is a technical issue. Before the release is out, which link should be
used? IIUC we can use the link at [1]. But it doesn't follow the INFRA
policy for formal releases. However, be
