Hi all,
Apache Celeborn(Incubating) community is glad to announce the
new release of Apache Celeborn(Incubating) 0.3.2.
Celeborn is dedicated to improving the efficiency and elasticity of
different map-reduce engines and provides an elastic, high-efficient
service for intermediate data including
+1 binding
I checked
+ Download links valid
+ Checksum and signature matches
+ NOTICE and LICENSE present
+ DISCLAIMER present
+ No unexpected binaries
+ Can compile from source with `sbt compile` on Darwin Kernel Version
22.5.0 ARM64
One suggestion:
Perhaps you should stage the release note as
+1 (binding)
Best Regards,
- He Xiaoqiao
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:39 PM Nicholas Jiang
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> Regards,
> Nicholas Jiang
> At 2024-01-04 10:47:41, "ShaoFeng Shi" wrote:
> >Hi Incubator,
> >
> >Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal[1],
> >I am starting this
+1(binding). Good luck!
Best Regards,
- He Xiaoqiao
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 12:51 AM sebb wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 at 10:04, tison wrote:
> >
> > Hi sebb,
> >
> > Thanks for your suggestion :D
> >
> > Would you provide some examples (perhaps from TLPs) for a proper
> description?
> >
> >
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 at 10:04, tison wrote:
>
> Hi sebb,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion :D
>
> Would you provide some examples (perhaps from TLPs) for a proper description?
>
> Also, this doesn't seem to be a blocker for graduation. So if it takes
> a few conversations to polish, you may create an i
Hi sebb,
Thanks for your suggestion :D
Would you provide some examples (perhaps from TLPs) for a proper description?
Also, this doesn't seem to be a blocker for graduation. So if it takes
a few conversations to polish, you may create an issue on [1] or email
to dev@opendal.a.o.
Best,
tison.
[1
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Nicholas Jiang
At 2024-01-04 10:47:41, "ShaoFeng Shi" wrote:
>Hi Incubator,
>
>Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal[1],
>I am starting this official vote for the Gluten project.
>
>Here is their proposal:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBA
Thanks, that looks fine.
I just noticed that the text regarding the use of hashes and sigs is
not quite correct.
There is no point checking both the hash and the sig.
Ideally check the sig, failing that check the hash.
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 at 02:58, Xuanwo wrote:
>
> > There is a problem with the