Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread benjobs
Thanks. We will solve these problems as soon as possible Sheng Wu 于2022年8月24日 周三14:19写道: > Hi StreamPark team > > AFAIK from a Java developer perspective, your GPL and LGPLthings are > not hard dependencies. The log component could be easier to be > replaced as log4j2, and mysql connector should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.2.1-incubating-rc1

2022-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, BTW that’s +1 (binding) from me. Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.2.1-incubating-rc1

2022-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Please ask you mentors to vote on your releases. If you mentors cannot then perhaps it’s time to find new mentors? Please do not use "Copyright 2020 and onwards” in the NOTICE file. I checked the source release: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - disclaimer exists (WIP)

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread Sheng Wu
Hi StreamPark team AFAIK from a Java developer perspective, your GPL and LGPLthings are not hard dependencies. The log component could be easier to be replaced as log4j2, and mysql connector should be possible to be optional, such as you pick Postgre as your major storage option. Please be clear

Fwd: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread tksonjk tk
-1, (non-binding) Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain in detail, thanks. and if you work for a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on S

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread 郭宁
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! Justin Mclean 于2022年8月24日周三 14:12写道: > HI, > > -1 (binding) because of GPL/LGPL dependancies and it’s unknown how these > will be dealt with. > > Note the "FOSS exception license” no longer applies [1] and even if it did > it most likely would not be allowed in ASF

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, -1 (binding) because of GPL/LGPL dependancies and it’s unknown how these will be dealt with. Note the "FOSS exception license” no longer applies [1] and even if it did it most likely would not be allowed in ASF project and you would be including GPL licensed- code. Kind Regards, Justin 1

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I notice the project has some GPL and LGPL dependancies, this would not be compatible with the Apache license, unless they are optional and the majority of users not use them. If they are not optional, how do you intend to remove these? Kind Regards, Justin

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Sheng Wu
AFAIK, we haven't done this. But in theory, we could introduce Apache Catalog A/B/X to support the compatibility check. If you want to help the project to support this, submit an issue here, https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Xiaofeng 于2022年8月24日周三 13:3

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread Jiafeng.Zhang
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! Jiafeng.Zhang Email: jiafengzh...@apache.org hulk 于2022年8月24日周三 13:34写道: > +1 (non-binding) > > Good luck! > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 13:04, benjobs wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread hulk
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 13:04, benjobs wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator > > > > Best, > benjobs. > > > Replied Message > From tison > Date 08/24/2022 11:56 > To Incubator > Subject [VOTE] Acce

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Xiaofeng
Hi, Will checking license compatible be a feature in the future? Regards, Xiaofeng Justin Mclean 于 2022年8月23日周二 16:13写道: > Hi, > > So taking a quick look at a SkyWalking release [1] I can see a couple of > minor issues with LICNSE and NOTICE. You may want to fix these. > > Hints: > Is OpenCens

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread Sherlock Homles
+1 (non-binding) StreamPark is a wonderful project. I have used it in production environment for a long time. Best wishes and Many thanks. Qingrong wang 于2022年8月24日周三 12:43写道: > > +1 (no-binding) > > StreamPark is a very greate project. Good luck! > > 陈卓宇 于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道: > > > > +1 (non-

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread benjobs
+1 (non-binding) we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator Best, benjobs. Replied Message >From tison Date 08/24/2022 11:56 To Incubator Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator Hi all, Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread shaokang lv
+1 (no-binding) StreamPark is a nice project. Good luck! Best, Shaokang Lv Qingrong wang 于2022年8月24日周三 12:43写道: > +1 (no-binding) > > StreamPark is a very greate project. Good luck! > > 陈卓宇 于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread Qingrong wang
+1 (no-binding) StreamPark is a very greate project. Good luck! 陈卓宇 于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道: > > +1 (non-binding) > > StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! > > Best, > Zhuoyu Chen > > tison 于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道: > > > Hi, > > > > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussi

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread 陈卓宇
+1 (non-binding) StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! Best, Zhuoyu Chen tison 于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道: > Hi, > > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose > slogan wr

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread tison
Hi, I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread: > Hi Chris, > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose slogan writes: > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users to connect, analyze and explore IoT data

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread tksonjk tk
-1, (non-binding) Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain in detail, thanks. and if you work for a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on St

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread tison
Please vote in the thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/dowk7mtw26vg74qcpx4ttjvn9tkwt5qk Best, tison. tison 于2022年8月24日周三 11:49写道: > Thanks for your participation! I'll start a vote now. > > Best, > tison. > > > Goson zhang 于2022年8月24日周三 09:40写道: > >> +1 (non-binding), good luck! >> >> dav

[VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

2022-08-23 Thread tison
Hi all, Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread tison
Thanks for your participation! I'll start a vote now. Best, tison. Goson zhang 于2022年8月24日周三 09:40写道: > +1 (non-binding), good luck! > > david zollo 于2022年8月23日周二 23:20写道: > > > if CCLA is signed, my problem is solved. > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > --- > > Apache DolphinSch

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread Goson zhang
+1 (non-binding), good luck! david zollo 于2022年8月23日周二 23:20写道: > if CCLA is signed, my problem is solved. > > > > Best Regards > > --- > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC > David > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.2.1-incubating-rc1

2022-08-23 Thread Jia Yu
Incubator IPMC, we have been stuck here for two weeks and only received 1 binding vote. Many users in our community are waiting for this release. I am not sure what's going on with the voting process. Please help us and cast your votes! On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 10:57 AM Jia Yu wrote: > Dear all,

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StreamPark

2022-08-23 Thread david zollo
if CCLA is signed, my problem is solved. Best Regards --- Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC David Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo Twitter: @WorkflowEasy --- On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:55 PM hua

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, So taking a quick look at a SkyWalking release [1] I can see a couple of minor issues with LICNSE and NOTICE. You may want to fix these. Hints: Is OpenCensus mentioned in LICENSE? Does prometheus client_model have a NOTICE file? Does mavin-wrapper have a NOTICE file? Also there is a compile

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Sheng Wu
Justin Mclean 于2022年8月23日周二 15:50写道: > > Hi, > > Also remember that it’s only code that ends up in the release and not all > dependancies that impact the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Agree. The tool would not be perfect, it just reduces the workload from a manual dependencies analysis. Sheng Wu 吴晟

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Sheng Wu
Yu Xiao 于2022年8月23日周二 15:44写道: > > Hi > > It is very good. > > Will the following features be available in the future : > > Comparison of license files with dependencies (e.g. license files with > missing some). It is available if you directly use GHA. SkyWalking uses this - GHA https://github.c

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Also remember that it’s only code that ends up in the release and not all dependancies that impact the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For ad

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Automated tools are a great help and can reduce the time required for this work, but please remember they will not find every issues. I’ve see this time and time again in incubating projects. Kind Regards, Justin - To unsub

Re: A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Yu Xiao
Hi It is very good. Will the following features be available in the future : Comparison of license files with dependencies (e.g. license files with missing some). Best wishes! Yu Xiao Apache ShenYu Sheng Wu 于2022年8月23日周二 15:00写道: > > Hi podlings > > Apache SkyWalking graduated from the incub

A license check tool offered by Apache SkyWalking Community

2022-08-23 Thread Sheng Wu
Hi podlings Apache SkyWalking graduated from the incubator years ago, but we still remember we were struggling to keep licenses of dependencies well organized and listed correctly. So, SkyWalking PMC/Committer worked with the community starting to build a tool to help with the license header and d