Hi,
+1(binding)
I checked:
- Download links are valid.
- LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, and NOTICE are good.
(The NOTICE year should be 2019-2022, we better update it in the next
version.)
- .sha & .asc checked
- Source files have license headers if necessary.
On 2022/03/15 11:32:15 Christofer Dutz w
Thanks Craig,
I have sent emails to our mentors for their votes.
On 2022/03/15 02:13:50 Craig Russell wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
> When you have a vote in the incubator, only IPMC members are considered
> binding.
>
> It's good to ask your mentors for their votes. If they all vote, you have all
hi, sebb,
thanks for the notification.
brpc will remove the old release this week.
thanks
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:51 AM sebb wrote:
> Several podlings have multiple releases under the dist/release area.
> Old versions should please be removed shortly after the next version
> has been releas
Thanks, Sebb.
Teaclave has resolved this issue and updated the download page.
Mingshen
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:50 AM sebb wrote:
>
> Several podlings have multiple releases under the dist/release area.
> Old versions should please be removed shortly after the next version
> has been released
Hi Craig,
so far we've always managed to get at least three binding votes from our
mentors, but this time we're lacking two more binding votes.
So any help in checking our release candidate is appreciated and thanks for
your support!
Cheers
Dominik
-Original Message-
From: Craig Russe
Several podlings have multiple releases under the dist/release area.
Old versions should please be removed shortly after the next version
has been released.
The policy can be found at [1] under the "Current and older releases" heading.
The podlings with multiple releases include:
AGE
Annotator
Br
Hi Christofer,
You have five mentors. Are they all unavailable?
Warm regards,
Craig
> On Mar 15, 2022, at 4:32 AM, Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
>
> Hi all ...
>
> it would be great if we could get at least one more IPMC to vote on this
>
> The StreamPipes team put specially a lot of effort int
+1 (not binding)
I checked
- Download links are valid.
- Checksum is valid.
- LICENSE and NOTICE files exist.
- Name includes "incubating"
- DISCLAIMER file exist
- NOTICE year is right.
- PGP signature is good.
Calvin Kirs 于2022年3月15日周二 10:16写道：
> Hi IPMC,
>
> This is an official vote for the
Hi all ...
it would be great if we could get at least one more IPMC to vote on this
The StreamPipes team put specially a lot of effort into merging the initially 3
separate repos into one to also make validating releases a lot easier. It would
be cool, if we could thank them by finally finding
Hi Kent,
Thanks for the reminder, I forgot to update the template, but the two files
are the same, I'll update this in a follow-up check.
Kent Yao 于2022年3月15日周二 17:56写道：
> Hi Calvin,
>
> > Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/seatunnel/KEYS
>
Hi Calvin,
> Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/seatunnel/KEYS
You shall use this address[1] for KEYS instead.
[1] https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/seatunnel/KEYS
BR,
Kent Yao
william-guo...@qq.com.INVALID
于2022年3月15日周二 17:26写道：
>
+1 （binding)
I checked:
[*] Download links are valid.
[*] DISCLAIMER is included.
[*] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[*] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each SeaTunnel repo.
[*] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
Apache Software
+1 （binding)
I checked:
All the download links work.
The License and Notice files are good to me.
There is no binary in the source release kit.
We have the incubating disclarm in the source file.
I can build the binary from the source kit.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Tue
13 matches
Mail list logo
