Hi,
> Why is the report without apache shenyu？
ShenYu is in group 1 which reports in January, April, July and October.
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comman
Hi Justin,
Why is the report without apache shenyu？
thanks
Justin Mclean 于2021年11月7日周日 上午7:48写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> The report can be found in the usual place:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/November2021
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
> --
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your script.
ShenYu has fixed the issue according to the prompt from the script.
--
Zhang Yonglun
Apache ShenYu (Incubating)
Apache ShardingSphere
Justin Mclean 于2021年11月5日周五 上午7:08写道：
> Hi,
>
> The script i used to check teh download pages is here if anyone is
> inter
Hi,
Ya, you’re right :)
+1 (non-binding)
Compiled on Arm M1
Compiled on Windows
Licenses checked (rat)
Checksum checked
Incubation in name
ASF headers
> On 7. Nov 2021, at 12:34, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’ll also note that Alexander’s vote is non binding, best practice to
> indic
Hi,
The issue has been described in detail multiple times. If you don’t understand
please talk to you mentors and they can help.
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additio
Hi,
I’ll also note that Alexander’s vote is non binding, best practice to indicate
it as such like so “+1 (non-binding)”. It also a good idea to list what was
checked in the release rather than just voting “+1". Only IPMC members votes
are binding on ASF incubator releases.
Kind Regards,
Justi
Hi,
I don’t understand what is the current problem because what was “copied”
was the image that was transcripts to OUR representation. Then the element
that can be claimed as “copied” is the information inside of the OUR
representation. When we change the content of the graph the Wikipedia
license
Hi,
Honestly I don’t get it. Same techniques are used in Apache Spark and Apache
Flink, as example. How’s that working?
We referenced the Wikipedia article as a documentation how page rank works. Why
should this violate the ASF policy? The algorithm looks exactly as is it is
[1], means the onl
Hi,
> Agree with Daniel, the node creation is a common technique in the data
> science community and does not represent code, it is representing a procedure
> to create nodes. Therefore the use of this procedure seems compliant.
IMO it is not compliant with ASF policy, no matter how common this
+1
PR for the NOTICE [1] includes the changes Justin suggested, will be fixed in
the next release. Agree with Daniel, the node creation is a common technique in
the data science community and does not represent code, it is representing a
procedure to create nodes. Therefore the use of this pro
Generally in agreement, but:
> given there may be a license issue and it's very easy to fix, why not fix it?
Any "fix" will look like the old code and thus be "modified".
The new graph in this case happens to have the same number of nodes and arcs as
the original copyrighted artwork, but arra
Hi,
> And sure, the image labeled with B and C is based on the non-labeled image
> with smiley faces, so I'll concede that image, and even the exact network it
> represents, may fall under CC-BY-SA, and thus it was correct to remove the
> old code.
This main issue I think as the old code wasn’
12 matches
Mail list logo
